Republican Nomination?

Started by Strangelove60 pages

Originally posted by Fishy
Rudy Giuliani is the only person I know, and I haven't heard to many bad things about him. So hopefully him, unless there is a less conservative republican out there. I wouldn't mind that one winning either.
....😑 Rudy is by far the least conservative in the Republican field

Originally posted by PVS
yeah, doesnt matter how you think im right, just as long as you know im right.

ONE MORE YEAR!!!
ONE MORE YEAR!!!
*cmon, chant with me, you used to love this)
ONE MORE YEAR!!!

Originally posted by PVS
now please stop derailing threads. 🙂

Relax PVS, clear those tears from your eyes.

Well, Fmr. Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee is in the race now, I think he's only the 2nd or 3rd 'official' candidate.

ioy90nF2anI&eurl

That was pretty weak

its not supposed to be moving or cinematic.

Originally posted by Soleran
That was pretty weak

That's because it's about a petty and weak man. This guy is all about winning and being president. He doesn't have one ounce of gumption. And everyone who thinks he deserves some measure of respect because he was a POW can just blow all that crap out their ass, just like he did when he supported the president on torture. He's Bush's lap dog

I have read a lot of positive stuff about Gulliani. However, with the announcment that he's considering a run for President he's starting to change several of his positions. Positions, I might add, he's said he would never change for anything. I suppose when he said "not for anything" he wasn't including the white house or the the religious right base.

Originally posted by PVS
ioy90nF2anI&eurl

L 😂 L Skys!!! What a schmuck.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
That's because it's about a petty and weak man. This guy is all about winning and being president. He doesn't have one ounce of gumption. And everyone who thinks he deserves some measure of respect because he was a POW can just blow all that crap out their ass, just like he did when he supported the president on torture. He's Bush's lap dog

I have read a lot of positive stuff about Gulliani. However, with the announcment that he's considering a run for President he's starting to change several of his positions. Positions, I might add, he's said he would never change for anything. I suppose when he said "not for anything" he wasn't including the white house or the the religious right base.

Man.

The evangelical crowd is screwed next year.

Clinton
Obama
McCain
Guilianni

^^^None of those are looking very apealing.

I'll throw my vote behind whoever says that they won't touch gay marriage or abortion in any way federally, and just lets the people (states) decide.

Which means I'll be voting for Obama, I guess?

Originally posted by sithsaber408
L 😂 L Skys!!! What a schmuck.

Man.

The evangelical crowd is screwed next year.

Clinton
Obama
McCain
Guilianni

^^^None of those are looking very apealing.

I'll throw my vote behind whoever says that they won't touch gay marriage or abortion in any way federally, and just lets the people (states) decide.

Which means I'll be voting for Obama, I guess?

You are ****ing kidding, right?

Gay Marriage and Abortion are your number one topics?

****.

Why not?

Originally posted by Soleran
Why not?

Not really the most important issues, now is it?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Not really the most important issues, now is it?

That's obviously subjective.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Not really the most important issues, now is it?

To each his own.

IMO America has more to fear from gay marriage leading to palygamy and bestiality in the next 50 years and abortion continuing to allow murdered children every day, than it does from terrorism.

They'll have no need of trying to destroy us from the outside if we've destroyed ourselves from within.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
IMO America has more to fear from gay marriage leading to palygamy and bestiality in the next 50 years than it does from terrorism.

That's ignorant on a scale I can't even begin to quantify.

true, its all subjective

Originally posted by sithsaber408
IMO America has more to fear from gay marriage leading to palygamy and bestiality in the next 50 years

that however is not subjective. its baseless and retarded.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
and abortion continuing to allow murdered children every day, than it does from terrorism.

got some figures to back this up?

Originally posted by sithsaber408
They'll have no need of trying to destroy us from the outside if we've destroyed ourselves from within.

what of the tens of thousands per year we kill just because other people happen to live in the vicinity of "them". i dont recall us leveling new york state because timothy mcveigh lived there.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
To each his own.

IMO America has more to fear from gay marriage leading to palygamy and bestiality in the next 50 years and abortion continuing to allow murdered children every day, than it does from terrorism.

They'll have no need of trying to destroy us from the outside if we've destroyed ourselves from within.

😂 You are such a right-wing mouthpiece. Do you have any personal opinions?

Who in their right mind thinks gay marriage leads to polygamy and bestiality? May I remind you that the only polygamous sect in the country's history so far was Christian

Originally posted by PVS
what of the tens of thousands per year we kill just because other people happen to live in the vicinity of "them". i dont recall us leveling new york state because timothy mcveigh lived there.

Indeed. The "War on Terror" doesn't have to be a physical war on the level it is today.

The most effective way to fight these people is on the smaller scale, on the level they operate. The most promising reports I've read indicate that counter intelligence operations would have much more effect than attempting to police an entire population.

If you guys wanna have the abortion or gay marriage debates again, let's continue them in those threads.

I made a response to who I will or won't vote for in the next election.

I gave a few reasons as to what helps me make my choice.

They may not be what motivates your vote, but so what?

It's what motivates mine, and as I said, just my opinion.

Your opinion of my opinions isn't something that really concerns me.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
Your opinion of my opinions isn't something that really concerns me.

Then don't address them.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Then don't address them.

Or don't offer them.

Stick to the topic and who should or shouldn't get the Repulican nomination, and your opinion of the potential nominees.