Republican Nomination?

Started by Strangelove60 pages

Originally posted by sithsaber408
Your opinion of my opinions isn't something that really concerns me.
Your opinions are not your own. You get them fed to you by Rick Santorum and Pat Robertson.

"Those that stand for nothing, fall for anything"

Originally posted by sithsaber408
Or don't offer them.

Stick to the topic and who should or shouldn't get the Repulican nomination, and your opinion of the potential nominees.

You brought it up, don't pin it on us

Originally posted by Strangelove
Your opinions are not your own. You get them fed to you by Rick Santorum and Pat Robertson.

"Those that stand for nothing, fall for anything"

L 😂 L sky's again!!!

I've never listened to a speech, sermon, quote, etc... from either of them.

My beliefs are my own, backed by logic and reason upon looking at a choice.

(though I suppose using the old parrot theme makes it easier for you to discredit a person's views without addressing them.)

Originally posted by sithsaber408

Your opinion of my opinions isn't something that really concerns me.

i respect your opinion SS. i just dispise your spoonfed talking points based on nothing more than lies. i'd be thrilled to see you formulate an opinion on your own with regards to government policy

Originally posted by sithsaber408
L 😂 L sky's again!!!

I've never listened to a speech, sermon, quote, etc... from either of them.

My beliefs are my own, backed by logic and reason upon looking at a choice.

(though I suppose using the old parrot theme makes it easier for you to discredit a person's views without addressing them.)

Oh no, I did address them. It's just that your 'logic' and 'reason' sound a lot a like speeches I've heard by right-wingnuts.

You're just like my brother. He claims to have opinions, but he never watches the news, just listens to and repeats soundbites. I pity him. And you.

Originally posted by Strangelove
You brought it up, don't pin it on us

No, I mentioned that evangelicals have no good choices in the Republican noms this year (or Democrat ones), and that I'd vote for whoever left the cultural issues to the states to decide.

'Twas bardock who jumped all over my stances, and y'all who jumped on the bandwagon.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
I've never listened to a speech, sermon, quote, etc... from either of them.

What a suprise! You might want to research your independant position to see if it's your own or not.

Originally posted by Strangelove
Oh no, I did address them. It's just that your 'logic' and 'reason' sound a lot a like speeches I've heard by right-wingnuts.

You're just like my brother. He claims to have opinions, but he never watches the news, just listens to and repeats soundbites. I pity him. And you.

Save the pity because I watch the news quite often. Kieth Olberman's show, in fact. (gotta get the other sides viewpoint to make an intelligent decision, after all.) I check into current events every day. Not that I need to defend myself to you, but I want you to know that people who keep conservative views aren't just uneducated fools who get their news from a pulpit on a sunday.

No matter, you're a young 20 year-old idealist who believes that absolute freedom is the best thing a person can hope for. Freedom for anything, no matter if that means a sex-change for a 12 year old.

Wanna know something funny? I was a liberal at 20 too.

Give it 4 or 5 years, we'll talk.

Originally posted by PVS
i respect your opinion SS. i just dispise your spoonfed talking points based on nothing more than lies. i'd be thrilled to see you formulate an opinion on your own with regards to government policy

Here's a few:

No prison time for drug users. Rehab and treatment, no matter how many offenses. Community service maybe, but as long as they aren't distributing and are just using.... no jail time.

Abortions only in the case of rape or life of the mother.
Sorry.

Civil unions for gay couples, with a "commitment ceremony" performed if they choose.

This provides all tax breaks and benefits, while keeping traditional marriage as the institution it always has been.

Off the top of my head, that's a good start.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
No prison time for drug users. Rehab and treatment, no matter how many offenses. Community service maybe, but as long as they aren't distributing and are just using.... no jail time.

acceptable considering the present policies regarding drug abuse.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
Abortions only in the case of rape or life of the mother.
Sorry.

better than nothing i guess

Originally posted by sithsaber408
Civil unions for gay couples, with a "commitment ceremony" performed if they choose.

would that not be a validation for homosexuals? would that not be the green light, so to speak, and bring about civil unions with dogs, donkeys, office furniture etc?

Originally posted by sithsaber408
Save the pity because I watch the news quite often. Kieth Olberman's show, in fact. (gotta get the other sides viewpoint to make an intelligent decision, after all.) I check into current events every day. Not that I need to defend myself to you, but I want you to know that people who keep conservative views aren't just uneducated fools who get their news from a pulpit on a sunday.

No matter, you're a young 20 year-old idealist who believes that absolute freedom is the best thing a person can hope for. Freedom for anything, no matter if that means a sex-change for a 12 year old.

Wanna know something funny? I was a liberal at 20 too.

Give it 4 or 5 years, we'll talk.

Actually, I respect many conservatives. I have plenty of friends that are conservative.

I just don't think that religious beliefs should guide public policy. If one reads the 14th Amendment, you can see that Gay Marriage is already Constitutionally protected, but it's the religious wingnuts like President Bush that keep it from becoming a reality.

a) I'm turning 19 in a week 13
b) I'm fairly certain I will hold these beliefs all my life, Ted Kennedy is a 'liberal' at 74, in any case.

Why do conservatives consider liberalism a "phase in life"?

Originally posted by sithsaber408
Abortions only in the case of rape or life of the mother.
Sorry.
Seems a bit hypocritical in the case of rape to me. You consider all life sacred and that life begins at conception, yet this child isn't allowed to live? Why not?
Originally posted by sithsaber408
Civil unions for gay couples, with a "commitment ceremony" performed if they choose.

This provides all tax breaks and benefits, while keeping traditional marriage as the institution it always has been.

So, ummm, whats the difference? Seems the exact same thing except called something different because they're gay. Are you protecting an institution (which by the way is completely broken to begin with) or a word?

Originally posted by Soleran
That's obviously subjective.

I guess. But what isn't.

Some might find actual people being killed in a war more important than two **** marrying or not actual people and parasites being stopped from becoming actual people.

But to each their own.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
To each his own.

IMO America has more to fear from gay marriage leading to palygamy and bestiality in the next 50 years and abortion continuing to allow murdered children every day, than it does from terrorism.

They'll have no need of trying to destroy us from the outside if we've destroyed ourselves from within.

Polygamy sounds good...also bestiality...if one is into it.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
No, I mentioned that evangelicals have no good choices in the Republican noms this year (or Democrat ones), and that I'd vote for whoever left the cultural issues to the states to decide.

'Twas bardock who jumped all over my stances, and y'all who jumped on the bandwagon.

Just for the record, I did not jump all over your your stances, just the importance you seem to give some over others.

I have to jump in and state that PVS' Condoleza/Bush sig is genius... 😆 😆

its not my idea i must confess

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/tags/bush-condi/

i just had to make a sig out of that

No matter, you're a young 20 year-old idealist who believes that absolute freedom is the best thing a person can hope for. Freedom for anything, no matter if that means a sex-change for a 12 year old.

Wanna know something funny? I was a liberal at 20 too.

Give it 4 or 5 years, we'll talk.


It's funny how so many republicans try to associate liberalism with young age. Naiveté may be associated with young age, not liberalism and Strangelove's views are generally far from naive or idealistic.

So save your "you'll grow out of it" bullshit, besides what are you? 22?

Originally posted by PVS
its not my idea i must confess

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/tags/bush-condi/

i just had to make a sig out of that

I like the picture of them in bed. 😂

Originally posted by Eis
It's funny how so many republicans try to associate liberalism with young age. Naiveté may be associated with young age, not liberalism and Strangelove's views are generally far from naive or idealistic.

So save your "you'll grow out of it" bullshit, besides what are you? 22?

Porque it tends to be true, ey.

Who's more likely to be an anti-war hippie: a college student or a middle-aged working man?

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Porque it tends to be true, ey.
incorrect
Who's more likely to be an anti-war hippie: a college student or a middle-aged working man?
And how many young hippies do you see these days? Now how many older ones?

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Porque it tends to be true, ey.

Who's more likely to be an anti-war hippie: a college student or a middle-aged working man?

It is true that many younger people look for idealistic causes and battles to fight...but that doesn't make every younger person naive or stupid and not everyone will grow out of it and also...it doesn't make conservative ideas better. Also, SS is like 2 years older than Strangelove...okay, maybe 3.