Blade vs. Gambit

Started by manorastroman6 pages

actually, there's a few. one scan comes to mind, when gambit blocked machine gun fire with his staff. in another, he not only blocked pistol fire, but reflected it back to the target.

Originally posted by grey fox
Gambit 7/10

Blade wears to much kevlar , by the time he's gotten the first few clips/buckles undone it would have exploded.

The problem with that is when Gambit charges stuff it explodes on impact. How is charging his kevlar gonna explode?

It's interesting Blade didn't seem to have any troubles dodging Gambits cards. Hmm...I say 50/50 now.

if Blade can tag Spiderman, then he should be able to hit Gambit, at least thats the way i see it.

Blade is really accurate with his weapons and fast enough to hit Spiderman like Braz said I believe he'll take Gambit in a fight.

Originally posted by braz
if Blade can tag Spiderman, then he should be able to hit Gambit, at least thats the way i see it.

ABC logic. Blade would be able to tag every street level then.

Blade is screwed more times than not at h2h, due to a nice insta-kill on Gambit's side. I do not seriously see guns playing a huge role, especially seeing exploding cards>mac-10. Gambit 7/10

Originally posted by YFZ 350
The problem with that is when Gambit charges stuff it explodes on impact. How is charging his kevlar gonna explode?

It's interesting Blade didn't seem to have any troubles dodging Gambits cards. Hmm...I say 50/50 now.

Because when Gambit charged the entire floor of a building, he had to throw the floor in order to make it explode?

Originally posted by Soljer
Because when Gambit charged the entire floor of a building, he had to throw the floor in order to make it explode?
😆

Originally posted by Soljer
Because when Gambit charged the entire floor of a building, he had to throw the floor in order to make it explode?
His powers are not supposed to work that way. I thought they were suppose to explode on impact. Has Gambit ever used this inta-kill tactic in combat?

Originally posted by YFZ 350
His powers are not supposed to work that way. I thought they were suppose to explode on impact. Has Gambit ever used this inta-kill tactic in combat?

I don't know where you're getting this 'explode on contact', they just explode.

Originally posted by Darth Macabre
I don't know where you're getting this 'explode on contact', they just explode.
It says in his handbook entry. Has he ever used this insta-kill method during combat? I gotta see this.

Originally posted by YFZ 350
His powers are not supposed to work that way. I thought they were suppose to explode on impact. Has Gambit ever used this inta-kill tactic in combat?

He can make something explode as a matter of course. Whenever he wants. He doesn't have to throw something, or even create any sort of 'impact' for the kinetically charged molecules to explode.

Originally posted by YFZ 350
It says in his handbook entry. Has he ever used this insta-kill method during combat? I gotta see this.

Don't listen to the handbooks, they're not always right....I'll see if I have any scans.

Gambit is a stud. He needs a ongoing again.

Stud or womaniser? 😬

What's the difference?

gambit for the win more often then not.

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
gambit for the win more often then not.
why?

Originally posted by Trackz
why?

Because he's better than Blade in every way that matters in a fight.

Originally posted by Enyalus
Because he's better than Blade in every way that matters in a fight.
example? he doesnt have super strength so thats out...

Originally posted by Trackz
example? he doesnt have super strength so thats out...

Faster. More agile. More versatile. He's also a great fencer, so Blade doesn't completely outclass him there.