Blade vs. Gambit

Started by snoopdogg6 pages
snoopdogg Big Pimpin

Originally posted by Trackz
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c379/Doggydogg/Blade%20fights/BladevsGambit2.jpg

http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c379/Doggydogg/Blade%20fights/BladevsGambit3.jpg

here we go, blade tries to cut him, gambit blocks, gambit tries to kick him, blade blocks then they land, gambit crouching, blade on all fours.

they should have the two team up again

Gambit didn't land that kick it looks to me. There wasn't a impact outline like there is on Gambit's feet when he landed. Or when he blocked Blade's sword with his bo staff. It looks to me he rolled with it.

Mindset Senior Member

Why would they write "Thwuk" if Gambit didn't actually hit him?

snoopdogg Big Pimpin

Probably to indicate he did throw a kick or a sweep. That looks like it's a sliding sound effect imo. Kinda like the infamous "snikt".

Trackz Senior Member

their fight was pretty much a stalemate anyway, gambit doesn't have any speed advantage

snoopdogg Big Pimpin

Originally posted by Trackz
their fight was pretty much a stalemate anyway, gambit doesn't have any speed advantage
Blade wasn't written as a vampire yet then either.

Battlehammer Senior Member

Originally posted by snoopdogg
Instead of downplaying every f*cking thing Blade has ever done why don't you just say who you think wins? Every thread you post in it with Blade you blabber your f*cking mouth.

what am I down playing? he trying to say that becauses blade match gambit for one pannel that means he as fast as him, thats retarded, that like literally a second of fighting. That alone would not prove blade to be equals in speed with gambit. How about yous top up playign every feat of blades. Blade came out worses then gambit, it clear by the sound and how blade landed compared to gambit, or are u suggesting blade coudl not land a back flipp he did?

calm your self, no need to get so mad because people dont agree tha blade owns all, nor do I agree with most of your interpertations of blades fights inwhich you clearly let yoru bias blind you from what occured.

Battlehammer Senior Member

Originally posted by Trackz
their fight was pretty much a stalemate anyway, gambit doesn't have any speed advantage

actaully he does, gambit has superior reflex feats and agility feats. so yes gambit is the quicker of the two.

Trackz Senior Member

Originally posted by Battlehammer
actaully he does, gambit has superior reflex feats and agility feats. so yes gambit is the quicker of the two.
in their fight the any advantage you feel he had wasn't apparent...

other than that blades speed feats are right there with his, and he has some that gambit doesn't have.

Battlehammer Senior Member

Originally posted by Trackz
in their fight the any advantage you feel he had wasn't apparent...

other than that blades speed feats are right there with his, and he has some that gambit doesn't have.


the fight latest seconds. You have to be kidding me, you relies that one two second fight does not inwhich blade did not seem slower does not make it a fatc baldes not slower. Just means the fight was to short to tell anything which si what occured.

You wanna match feats? becuase gambit has superior ones in agility and reflex.

snoopdogg Big Pimpin

Originally posted by Battlehammer
the fight latest seconds. You have to be kidding me, you relies that one two second fight does not inwhich blade did not seem slower does not make it a fatc baldes not slower. Just means the fight was to short to tell anything which si what occured.

You wanna match feats? becuase gambit has superior ones in agility and reflex.

Are you American? This is a serious question.

Battlehammer Senior Member

Originally posted by snoopdogg
Are you American? This is a serious question.

No sure what beigng American has anything to do with this debate.

Trackz Senior Member

Originally posted by Battlehammer
the fight latest seconds. You have to be kidding me, you relies that one two second fight does not inwhich blade did not seem slower does not make it a fatc baldes not slower. Just means the fight was to short to tell anything which si what occured.

You wanna match feats? becuase gambit has superior ones in agility and reflex.

the topic wasn't about agility, it was one of pure speed

snoopdogg Big Pimpin

Originally posted by Battlehammer
what am I down playing? he trying to say that becauses blade match gambit for one pannel that means he as fast as him, thats retarded, that like literally a second of fighting. That alone would not prove blade to be equals in speed with gambit. How about yous top up playign every feat of blades. Blade came out worses then gambit, it clear by the sound and how blade landed compared to gambit, or are u suggesting blade coudl not land a back flipp he did?

calm your self, no need to get so mad because people dont agree tha blade owns all, nor do I agree with most of your interpertations of blades fights inwhich you clearly let yoru bias blind you from what occured.

I don't see how Gambit couldn't hit Blade with his cards but he managed to kick him. I don't think the kick landed.

Battlehammer Senior Member

I also like to mention that though Gambit is superior to Blade in reflex speed and perhaps combat movement speed he is not enough so that Blade would not be able to keep up and would not be much of a factor if at all in a fight. Gambit however does have an agility edge

snoopdogg Big Pimpin

Originally posted by Battlehammer
No sure what beigng American has anything to do with this debate.
It has nothing to do with this debate. Just trying to understand why you make so many spelling errors.

Battlehammer Senior Member

Originally posted by snoopdogg
I don't see how Gambit couldn't hit Blade with his cards but he managed to kick him. I don't think the kick landed.

becauses there a huge differences in dodge a projectile and a kick especially when it a card not even a dam bullet. come on now this is what I am talking about. Becuase gambit dident land with a card that means his kick dident land, that just wishful thinking on your part.

Trackz Senior Member

Originally posted by Battlehammer
I also like to mention that though Gambit is superior to Blade in reflex speed and perhaps combat movement speed he is not enough so that Blade would not be able to keep up and would not be much of a factor if at all in a fight. Gambit however does have an agility edge
I doubt that edge helps him win the fight however.

snoopdogg Big Pimpin

Originally posted by Battlehammer
becauses there a huge differences in dodge a projectile and a kick especially when it a card not even a dam bullet. come on now this is what I am talking about. Becuase gambit dident land with a card that means his kick dident land, that just wishful thinking on your part.
Don't you mean a projectile that explodes? Not just any projectile.

Battlehammer Senior Member

Originally posted by snoopdogg
It has nothing to do with this debate. Just trying to understand why you make so many spelling errors.

why would being american make me have bad spelling errors?

I have spellign erros, becuase I dont uses spell check ever, I type to fast and have dyslexia

Battlehammer Senior Member
Originally posted by snoopdogg
Don't you mean a projectile that explodes? Not just any projectile.

Yes, but it much slower then a bullet, much easier to dodge espcially since Gambit would not have charge it at lethal levels.

also it a comic book fact it harder to dodge punches and kicks then projectiles.