Originally posted by FeceMan
Perhaps I am a bad person, but I believe that we ought to start removing bad dictators from power in other countries.
we dont have the resources to cure the world of evil. and if we just happen to be combatting evil on top of oil for 20 years...well other nations start seeing a pattern. so no, not a bad person. just naive.
Originally posted by Seth Wynd
How did it pose a threat during all the air-strikes that followed the Gulf War? Or is blowing shit up from a distance because he refused to comply with the UN a-okay, just because we don't have to actually rebuild it all?
ill ask for the forth time:
how did hussein pose a thread to the u.s.? we went to war because of
the declared certainty that he was seeking uraniun from africa and had connection with and helped fund al qaeda (the obvious conclusion that he had something to do with 9-11). how was the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA in danger because of saddam husseins regime?
it seems that there is no reason left to have gone top war,
and the only remaining constant for being there is oil.
nobody in iraq wants us there, yet we occupy it still indefinately.
and our only 'plan' involves retaking bagdhad (which will most likely kill hundreds of our troops) and causing the whole of the city to remain on the front line for years as we attempt to police a civil war. (will will most likely cause the deaths of a couple of thousand u.s. soldiers.)
why was this worth it? why if not oil?
Originally posted by KidRock
This coming from the, according to his myspace, canadian whigger trying to be a rapper.
ha funny. that's why i record my shit in new jersey and i have 2 albums being released this year. also i am a music PRODUCER.
this all coming from a ****** who labels himself Kid Rock.
you suck at life.
Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
Again? There has only been one so far (WWII), and while the US certainly played a large part in the outcome of that conflict it didn't exactly go it alone.
I never said it did 😐
The aid of countries like England and Canada played a big part in defeating the Axis of evil. That is undeniable
However, the only reason that the US 'polices' the world is because no one else will take a stand to injustice. So until the UN finally starts doing what is created to do, the US is essentially going to have to police the world.
Of course, now that Kofi Annan is gone the UN finally has a chance to do some good in the world rather than simply be a platform for corrupt politicians to launder money from
Originally posted by LaHaine
unless you americans are the first to invade "our corner".kill the human race, i hate everybody equally, as i have already states.
**** you and **** god.
Yes great argument 🙄
Because killing innocent people and preaching against the being who created existence is obviously a great path to go down to 🙄
And you aren't making yourself sound like a serial killer right now or anything, right?
And if everyone in "you're corner" is just as much of a psychopathic and delusional person as you are, then maybe we should just take you over 😐
But, I know most Canadians aren't like that so, we wont
Originally posted by PVS
thats quite a coward move since you have no pic of yourself posted anywhere. just an observation.
Sure thing buddy. Buy me a digital camera and mail it to me and I would be happy to take a picture.
Originally posted by LaHaine
unless you americans are the first to invade "our corner".kill the human race, i hate everybody equally, as i have already stated.
**** you, **** your emoticons, and **** god.
What is this? I sense a hybrid of some kind. Can it really be? A whigger/emo mixture? Mother of god..
haaha. americans are their inflated egos. funny.
emo? if you seen me in person you would know that isn't true. i would destroy you, kid. you're my semen.
"then maybe we should just take you over". i guarantee you no canadian in my "corner" would let an american soldier come through without bullets flying at them. death is ugly 'cause you fear it, it's beautiful to demons.
"Because killing innocent people and preaching against the being who created existence is obviously a great path to go down to".
there is no creator but the creator we created.
god is man's greatest mistake, or is man god's mistake?
you tryped: "you're corner"
if YOU'RE (as in 'you are'😉 gonna type like a self-righteous, holier-than-thou, god-fearing, school-believing pussy, then type with proper grammar. you're is short for 'you are'.
write that down.
Originally posted by LaHaine
haaha. americans are their inflated egos. funny.emo? if you seen me in person you would know that isn't true. i would destroy you, kid. you're my semen.
"then maybe we should just take you over". i guarantee you no canadian in my "corner" would let an american soldier come through without bullets flying at them. death is ugly 'cause you fear it, it's beautiful to demons.
"Because killing innocent people and preaching against the being who created existence is obviously a great path to go down to".
there is no creator but the creator we created.
god is man's greatest mistake, or is man god's mistake?
you tryped: "you're corner"
if YOU'RE (as in 'you are'😉 gonna type like a self-righteous, holier-than-thou, god-fearing, school-believing pussy, then type with proper grammar. you're is short for 'you are'.
write that down.
Canadians are cool, however you are not
Calling someone you're 'seman'?!? 🤨
You just pwned yourself
Originally posted by PVS
ill ask for the forth time:how did hussein pose a thread to the u.s.? we went to war because of
the declared certainty that he was seeking uraniun from africa and had connection with and helped fund al qaeda (the obvious conclusion that he had something to do with 9-11). how was the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA in danger because of saddam husseins regime?it seems that there is no reason left to have gone top war,
and the only remaining constant for being there is oil.
nobody in iraq wants us there, yet we occupy it still indefinately.
and our only 'plan' involves retaking bagdhad (which will most likely kill hundreds of our troops) and causing the whole of the city to remain on the front line for years as we attempt to police a civil war. (will will most likely cause the deaths of a couple of thousand u.s. soldiers.)why was this worth it? why if not oil?
Stare long and hard at that bolded text. This time, I was patient, and let you answer the damn question all by yourself. Now, considering the fact that there was reason to believe he was actually seeking uranium for use in WMDs, there's also the fact that we're bound to protect countries like Kuwait; which he'd attacked previously WITHOUT nukes. And given the absolute disregard he'd shown for the lives of his own people in the past, odds are he wouldn't rule out nuking them just because the radiation would likely kill off his own people as well as the Kuwaitis (not to mention US troops still stationed there).
Now, just because we got intel wrong does not mean it was no longer a reason. Let's say a friend told you that one of your classmates was planning on getting a gun, for the sole purpose of killing you and some of your friends. Would you sit back and wait to see what happened, or would you actually DO something (call the police, etc). That's a smaller version of what happened with Iraq.
[The following quote is taken from the Annenburg Political Fact Check, article title of "Bush's "16 Words" on Iraq & Uranium: He May Have Been Wrong But He Wasn't Lying"]
Bush said then, “The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa .” Some of his critics called that a lie, but the new evidence shows Bush had reason to say what he did.-A British intelligence review released July 14 calls Bush’s 16 words “well founded.”
-A separate report by the US Senate Intelligence Committee said July 7 that the US also had similar information from “a number of intelligence reports,” a fact that was classified at the time Bush spoke.
-Ironically, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who later called Bush’s 16 words a “lie”, supplied information that the Central Intelligence Agency took as confirmation that Iraq may indeed have been seeking uranium from Niger .
-Both the US and British investigations make clear that some forged Italian documents, exposed as fakes soon after Bush spoke, were not the basis for the British intelligence Bush cited, or the CIA's conclusion that Iraq was trying to get uranium.
Now, honestly tell me that a man who has made it VERY clear that he despises the US as well as our allies, who we have reason to believe was actively trying to obtain Uranium for nuclear weapons, didn't pose a threat.
Whether or not we found nukes, the FACT remains that at the time; we had every reason to believe he was trying to build them. If that's not enough for you, I'm apoligize on the behalf of the Coalition Intelligence agencies for not employing psychics to look forward a few years.
Originally posted by LaHaine
i will **** you till you love me, *****.
Sorry to disappoint, but there's a few reasons why that wouldn't happen.
One: I only have no interest in people with an IQ smaller than my shoe size.
Two: sorry to disappoint, but I'm quite content with the girl I have now. Maybe you should post a Personals ad, "arrogant whigger seeks same" if you're so desperate for affection.
Three: with the attitude you have, you wouldn't live long enough in a right-to-carry state to get anywhere near me. You'd be lucky enough to make it outta Phoenix alive, let alone make it to the secluded part of Arizona I live in.
Now if you're done jacking off to your ego, either get back to the discussion topic or please jump into traffic at the next possible convenience.