Originally posted by Quiero Mota
He's in Britain, dumbass.It's one of the more gay friendly countries in the world.
I know that 🙄
I'm asking him would he kill me if he had the chance...and why
If he has no problem with his religion condoning the murder of homosexuals, i dont see why he would keep himself from doing such a thing
Well, I know he considers himself a democrat(which doesn't imply you have to like gays) and that he has said he has no problem with gay people. But I'm just wondering how degrading the jokes have to be for him not find them funny enough to post a smilie and point out how hilarious he found it.
I'm not trying to insult. There's plenty of that in the thread already. I'm just curious.
Like above, what's his name said that killing one gay man sends a message to all other gay men. Was he joking? I dunno, but he'd be warned out the wazoo if he had said women or blacks or mexicans or christians, etc.
Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Well, I know he considers himself a democrat(which doesn't imply you have to like gays) and that he has said he has no problem with gay people. But I'm just wondering how degrading the jokes have to be for him not find them funny enough to post a smilie and point out how hilarious he found it.I'm not trying to insult. There's plenty of that in the thread already. I'm just curious.
Like above, what's his name said that killing one gay man sends a message to all other gay men. Was he joking? I dunno, but he'd be warned out the wazoo if he had said women or blacks or mexicans or christians, etc.
Nah, it would have been equally funny, for me anyways.
Originally posted by BackFire
Women.I know, because I do it all the time.
They cry, I laugh. They yell, I hit. It's a vicious (fun) cycle.
That's because you're an equal opprotunity discriminator. That's why everyone gets along with you. However, other moderators would get all twisted up if the comment had been about any of the groups I mentioned. But they seem to have no issues with it when someone says that about gay people. And maybe it has to do with the intolerence of Islam, but we aren't in a mosque.
Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
That's because you're an equal opprotunity discriminator. That's why everyone gets along with you. However, other moderators would get all twisted up if the comment had been about any of the groups I mentioned. But they seem to have no issues with it when someone says that about gay people. And maybe it has to do with the intolerence of Islam, but we aren't in a mosque.
Oh trust me butt brother....i know exactly what you speak of...
A certain moderator has infinite patience for posters who insult Gay people...for posters who regard homosexuals as disgusting, sinful, deserving of going to Hell, deserving of Execution, etc. But this moderator gets quickly infuriated with me when I say something to offend Christians....
Even when its light hearted humor and not intended as hate...i get warned, yet she allows idiots like Adarksiedjedi, Muslimscholar, Jesusisalive, Marcello, and Whob (i mean Thundar) to make all the anti-gay statements they want.
🙄
Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
just to go off topic for a moment, but exactly which gay jokes are going too far for you?
I was laughing at the fact, that lord xyz straight-up insulted Islam. He questioned the natrulness of angels talking to people and a 54-year-old man having sex with a 9-year-old girl.
That comment of his was directed at muslimscholar, and his audacity is what made me laugh.
You lost me at "butt brother".
That isn't brought up to make you defensive or to make others question their own sexuality. But your response hardly counts as a legitimate response. Moderators aside...I'm just wondering why ****** jokes are considered legitimate, while women, black, slaves, mexican, or muslim jokes are considerd "off-limits". Talk about the ****** all you like. "We'll figure some way to make it stick". But don't talk about darkies or Muslims.... That might be offensive" What with the singing in the fields and all.
Originally posted by Quiero Mota
I was laughing at the fact, that lord xyz straight-up insulted Islam. He questioned the natrulness of angels talking to people and a 54-year-old man having sex with a 9-year-old girl.That comment of his was directed at muslimscholar, and his audacity is what made me laugh.
So, how far is too far...as far as you're concerned? When will the smiles no longer be an avatar for your acceptance?
Look, I understand that the mexcican or hispanic community is cool with bashing homosexuals, but when will you no longer consider it "cool" or in fashion?
Or should you just be addressed like Sithsabre?
Originally posted by Alfheim
Interesting I thought Mohammed died of natural causes, can you give me the source for this?
Don't have a link, but I do have a quote(s)
Immediately following the conquest of Khaibar, a Jewish woman prepared a dinner for Muhammad and some of his men. Unknown to the Muslims was that she had put a poison into the lamb (some say goat) that was served at dinner. Muhammad ate some of the poisoned lamb and died as a result three years later.
Bukhari's Hadith 5.713:
Narrated Ibn Abbas:
[...]
Ibn 'Abbas replied, "That indicated the death of Allah's Apostle which Allah informed him of." 'Umar said, "I do not understand of it except what you understand."
Narrated 'Aisha: The Prophet in his ailment in which he died, used to say, "O 'Aisha! I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison."
Bukhari Hadith 3.786:
Narrated Anas bin Malik: A Jewess brought a poisoned (cooked) sheep for the Prophet who ate from it. She was brought to the Prophet and he was asked, "Shall we kill her?" He said, "No." I continued to see the effect of the poison on the palate of the mouth of Allah's Apostle.
Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Don't have a link, but I do have a quote(s)Immediately following the conquest of Khaibar, a Jewish woman prepared a dinner for Muhammad and some of his men. Unknown to the Muslims was that she had put a poison into the lamb (some say goat) that was served at dinner. Muhammad ate some of the poisoned lamb and died as a result three years later.
Bukhari's Hadith 5.713:
Narrated Ibn Abbas:
[...]
Ibn 'Abbas replied, "That indicated the death of Allah's Apostle which Allah informed him of." 'Umar said, "I do not understand of it except what you understand."Narrated 'Aisha: The Prophet in his ailment in which he died, used to say, [b]"O 'Aisha! I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison."
Bukhari Hadith 3.786:
Narrated Anas bin Malik: A Jewess brought a poisoned (cooked) sheep for the Prophet who ate from it. She was brought to the Prophet and he was asked, "Shall we kill her?" He said, "No." I continued to see the effect of the poison on the palate of the mouth of Allah's Apostle. [/B]
Damn, thats from sahih bukhari. That probably means that sunni's have to accept the hadiths. As you probably know for hadiths to be accepted the chain of narration has to be reliable as well.
Do you know for sure that the chain of narration is reliable? The reason im asking is because somebody could just claim that the chain of narration is rubbish and reject it.
Originally posted by Lord Urizen
I know that 🙄I'm asking him would he kill me if he had the chance...and why
If he has no problem with his religion condoning the murder of homosexuals, i dont see why he would keep himself from doing such a thing
not every muslim has a right to kill gay people only a islamic goverment can do that
Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Don't have a link, but I do have a quote(s)Immediately following the conquest of Khaibar, a Jewish woman prepared a dinner for Muhammad and some of his men. Unknown to the Muslims was that she had put a poison into the lamb (some say goat) that was served at dinner. Muhammad ate some of the poisoned lamb and died as a result three years later.
Bukhari's Hadith 5.713:
Narrated Ibn Abbas:
[...]
Ibn 'Abbas replied, "That indicated the death of Allah's Apostle which Allah informed him of." 'Umar said, "I do not understand of it except what you understand."Narrated 'Aisha: The Prophet in his ailment in which he died, used to say, [b]"O 'Aisha! I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison."
Bukhari Hadith 3.786:
Narrated Anas bin Malik: A Jewess brought a poisoned (cooked) sheep for the Prophet who ate from it. She was brought to the Prophet and he was asked, "Shall we kill her?" He said, "No." I continued to see the effect of the poison on the palate of the mouth of Allah's Apostle. [/B]
when muhammed put the meat in his mouth the bone of the meat said dont eat me i am poisend but the other muslim who was with the prophet died as a result she was killed
i think the refrences are incorrect because i cant find it it supposed to be
Volume , Book , Number : in that order
can u dind the correct refernace plz ty