Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Well bacteria have no gender, since theyre unicellular.
Bacteria can change genders....
😐
Originally posted by Quiero Mota
And how do fungus have gay sex if they lack penises and vaginas (which are animal organs)?
They don't have sex. They just shun the company of the opposite sex and couple up with other of the same sex....
You can't be a homosexual unless you have a mammalian penis....?
😬
Originally posted by sithsaber408
My argument is that homosexuality is unnatural. (for us)
your loading of the question just piles on yet more horseshit and renders it all mindless garbage. now you want to invent this new "man nature" in which blowjobs and kissing are natural yet being gay isnt natural. where watching monday night football falls within the realm of earthly creation, yet homosexuality is an unnatural anomoly. all because you said so...because you just made it up now, on the spot, out the rectum, to win the thread. that and flood flood flood with parroting and strawman tactics.
unless your goal is to look like the babbling village idiot, you really are wasting your time as well as everyone elses. at least sing a song and juggle some bowling pins and chainsaws while your at it, so we might be slightly amused
Originally posted by sithsaber408
Maybe, but for the sake of discussing [b]human sexuality, I'd think that what has a natural process and function and produces offspring falls under natural, and what produces nothing would fall under "other." (like a bj)My argument is that homosexuality is unnatural. (for us)
Your whole point, the "entire foundation of your opinion" is that fungi, birds, reptiles, and fish among other animals do it.
I fail to see how that makes it a natural behavior for humans.
Were I to abdicate child canibalism, and state that I like it, it feels good, and animals do it naturally.... I would be given the death sentence.
Ditto for murdering my spouse after sex. You look rather foolish trying to berate me when it's you who's acting the 4th grader.
You have NO other proof of homosexuality being "natural" other than to point to animals and reptiles and such.
That is folly!
Animals are not human beings sir, whether your own personal belief is in evolution or not.
No evolutionist or anybody else with a sound mind would lobby for the legitimization of any activity or behavior based on the argument that "the behavior is present in the animal kingdom."
Even in animals it produces no offspring and they continue to mate with the opposite sex to naturally continue the species.
So you fail again.
But they are not the standard nor example that human beings hold themselves up to.
You would'nt try to pass a law or teach in shcools that eating your own sh!t is natural would you?
When the kids ask why, you wouldn't have the adacity to tell them it's because Rover does it, and they can too, would you?
My point, still unanswered... is that animals do many other things naturally, and we don't follow their behaviors do we?
Why the exception for homosexuality?
Because it feels good?
You'll need a better reason than that to teach people that it's normal and natural and your reason for saying so is based on the behaviors of the animal kingdom. [/B]
I remember reading somewhere once that homosexuality is like a trigger gene in species. When a species reaches a certain "limit" the gene is produced to help control that species population.
Originally posted by PVSTo clarify I think he's using the definition of "unnatural" from Webster's Bullshit Made-Up Dictionary - where it's an adjective that means "things that my fictional god and I think are icky and bad and don't approve of because of aforementioned ickiness and badness."
your loading of the question just piles on yet more horseshit and renders it all mindless garbage. now you want to invent this new "man nature" in which blowjobs and kissing are natural yet being gay isnt natural. where watching monday night football falls within the realm of earthly creation, yet homosexuality is an unnatural anomoly. all because you said so...because you just made it up now, on the spot, out the rectum, to win the thread. that and flood flood flood with parroting and strawman tactics.unless your goal is to look like the babbling village idiot, you really are wasting your time as well as everyone elses. at least sing a song and juggle some bowling pins and chainsaws while your at it, so we might be slightly amused
Originally posted by LethalFemme
There you go.👆
that was only mildly funny...well actually it wasnt funny at all, but my mind tricked me into thinking it was mildly funny because i want to have intercourse with you....naturally of course (for us) which involves a threesome with silver tears....naturally
:edit: i sense the presense of whob. get ready
Originally posted by PVS
that was only mildly funny...well actually it wasnt funny at all, but my mind tricked me into thinking it was mildly funny because i want to have intercourse with you....naturally of course (for us) which involves a threesome with silver tears....naturally:edit: i sense the presense of whob. get ready
I can't because a threesome is infact unatrual in every aspect. See my god believes that only one penis should ever enter the body at once. Although seeing as Irene has a vagina and not a penis we might be able to get around that rule.
edit:Is he invited to the orgy?
Originally posted by PVS
that was only mildly funny...well actually it wasnt funny at all, but my mind tricked me into thinking it was mildly funny because i want to have intercourse with you....naturally of course (for us) which involves a threesome with BackFire....naturally:edit: i sense the presense of whob. get ready
Fixed this for you, since there was an obvious typo.
Re: Proposal Requires Straights to Have Kids or Marriages Will Be Voided
Sounds like a good proposal to me. Just make it so teh "straights" and teh "gays" have to compete against each other to see who can make a baby quicker. Oh yeah, and no artificial means of pregnancy can be used by either group, and they both have to only have sex with their partners. Who do you guys think will win teh race?
Re: Re: Proposal Requires Straights to Have Kids or Marriages Will Be Voided
Originally posted by Thundar
Sounds like a good proposal to me. Just make it so teh "straights" and teh "gays" have to compete against each other to see who can make a baby quicker. Oh yeah, and no artificial means of pregnancy can be used by either group, and they both have to only have sex with their partners. Who do you guys think will win teh race?
Hey guess what, I found a thread that kind of adresses the above issue.
Pretty good read.😉
Re: Re: Re: Proposal Requires Straights to Have Kids or Marriages Will Be Voided
Originally posted by Thundar
Hey guess what, I found a thread that kind of adresses the above issue.Pretty good read.😉
Except for that idiot who started the thread.
Originally posted by LethalFemme
As I said my religion prohibits double penetration. So unless one for you guys is willing to take one for the team it isn't gonna happen.
ive had enough of backfire plowing my ass. not only that but his ass is busted. its like screwing a tractor tire.
anyway, lets get back to discussing me penetrating you