KMC vs Real debating

Started by UniOmni4 pages

KMC vs Real debating

On KMC, we tend to take the characters at their max....

Ie, Superman using speedblitzes and GL recreating the entire Corps. Or Flash and his heat touch.

Or Thor and his godblast. Or Hulk and his dimensional claps. Or Surfer turning people into cookies.

This place is like CBR without the intelligence.

I vote that we use the characters as presented in the funny papers, not how we'd like to see them in the funny papers all the time.

Re: KMC vs Real debating

Originally posted by UniOmni
On KMC, we tend to take the characters at their max....

Which is a good way to debate and what forum rules say.

Originally posted by UniOmni
This place is like CBR without the intelligence.

CBR takes fights like Flash vs Batman seriously (and bash people who say Flash would win) this is backwards.

Re: KMC vs Real debating

Originally posted by UniOmni
On KMC, we tend to take the characters at their max....

Ie, Superman using speedblitzes and GL recreating the entire Corps. Or Flash and his heat touch.

Or Thor and his godblast. Or Hulk and his dimensional claps. Or Surfer turning people into cookies.

This place is like CBR without the intelligence.

I vote that we use the characters as presented in the funny papers, not how we'd like to see them in the funny papers all the time.

i learn

The only real problem I have with the way we debate is how people rely wayyyy too much on feats for debates. I mean it gets to the point where we start saying, "The most Person A lifted was 72 tons and the most Person B lifted was 73 tons, so Person B is clearly stronger!"

Re: KMC vs Real debating

Originally posted by UniOmni
On KMC, we tend to take the characters at their max....

Ie, Superman using speedblitzes and GL recreating the entire Corps. Or Flash and his heat touch.

Or Thor and his godblast. Or Hulk and his dimensional claps. Or Surfer turning people into cookies.

This place is like CBR without the intelligence.

I vote that we use the characters as presented in the funny papers, not how we'd like to see them in the funny papers all the time.

"Real debating" ?

We should take Namor jobbing to Wolverine "really" seriously?

We have the in-character aspect nailed down....except there at bloodlust.

So, yeah, Superman WOULD speedblitz if he was bloodlusted. However Absorbing Man wouldn't absorb the oxygen molecules around him to turn into Iceman-lite because he's too damn dumb.

This is real debating. We use logic AND comic feats WHILE discounting feats that don't match up with their character and what they're capable of.

Re: KMC vs Real debating

Originally posted by UniOmni
On KMC, we tend to take the characters at their max....

Ie, Superman using speedblitzes and GL recreating the entire Corps. Or Flash and his heat touch.

Or Thor and his godblast. Or Hulk and his dimensional claps. Or Surfer turning people into cookies.

This place is like CBR without the intelligence.

I vote that we use the characters as presented in the funny papers, not how we'd like to see them in the funny papers all the time.


Well, you can either make a thread with your stipulations or stay on CBR.

Re: Re: KMC vs Real debating

Originally posted by Badabing
Well, you can either make a thread with your stipulations or stay on CBR.

CBR has the same rules we do. Except a bit stricter. Also all the battles have to take place in a "Khazan arena".

However CBR allows ANY fictional character to battle with another.

i also like the color commentary over there...

Re: Re: Re: KMC vs Real debating

Originally posted by Draco69
CBR has the same rules we do. Except a bit stricter. Also all the battles have to take place in a "Khazan arena".

However CBR allows ANY fictional character to battle with another.

"Khazan"?

Originally posted by Scoobless
"Khazan"?

I think its a HitchHikersGuide reference.

Re: KMC vs Real debating

Originally posted by UniOmni
On KMC, we tend to take the characters at their max....

Ie, Superman using speedblitzes and GL recreating the entire Corps. Or Flash and his heat touch.

Or Thor and his godblast. Or Hulk and his dimensional claps. Or Surfer turning people into cookies.

This place is like CBR without the intelligence.

I vote that we use the characters as presented in the funny papers, not how we'd like to see them in the funny papers all the time.

😆 😕 😱 🤣

Re: Re: KMC vs Real debating

Originally posted by Soleran
😆 😕 😱 🤣

HEY! This is serious stuff. 😠

Re: Re: Re: KMC vs Real debating

Originally posted by Badabing
HEY! This is serious stuff. 😠

I wish I would have saved your description of debates from the WW vs SS forum that is a classic funny line for Comic debates.

Re: Re: Re: Re: KMC vs Real debating

Originally posted by Soleran
I wish I would have saved your description of debates from the WW vs SS forum that is a classic funny line for Comic debates.

The fanboy post?

KMC 10/10

😛

CBR Rumbles go on feats and feats alone. Any statement is disregarded as hyperbole unless it is actually shown in a feat. Thus, even statements regarding past events and canon are ditched. A character I know was said to have destroyed a planet but they ruled it out because we never saw it.

CBR discounts anything on panel that is not an actual feat.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: KMC vs Real debating

Originally posted by Badabing
The fanboy post?

Yes except it isn't just about fanboys🙂 😠

My real beef with this forums debating style, is that it doesn't translate into comics.

Superman uses his speed truly in a speedblitz manner like 4 times outta 100 showings.

Thats not his average.

Flash doesn't steal speed, but robs characters of their momentum...And he does that once in a blue moon. Yet forum flash does a speed steal and then a few hundred imps follow. Or heat touch, if Great Danes logged on.

I should know, i've used this tactic.

Its not debating characters, its debating powersets. And thats not true to the characters.

Maybe if we said like one time outta ten, Superman wins a match with a speedblitz on Surfer/Thor.

But we say 10/10 and say due to the speedblitz.

Or Thor 10/10, due to the Godblast.

Or Kyle/Hal 10/10, due to him recreating the JLA.

Or Surfer taking them on a trip through time, and leaving them in the time stream.

Its not the characters you debate, but the powersets and feats. Thats not debating, but a pissing contest.

PIS, and CIS are acronyms that make this forum laughable.
Pretty much, us saying which showings we like, and which ones we don't.

Taking character as well as power usages into consideration makes the debating much more worthwhile.

So what exactly are you trying to say here?

I'm curious, is there some mystical force or legal technicality that requires that you continue to frequent the unintelligent KMC? And do you actually expect it to be changed because of a rant?