Originally posted by great_dane
jump off my penal jax.your gay.
"he makes me laugh guys"
cheap ass admirer.
look, everything I've said of flash is perfectly legit, its all been proven off panels and scans, and comics.
he's the goat
😕 😕 😕 😆 😆 The flash is never beating any being more powerful than Thanos.
Originally posted by UniOmni
the point of this thread was merely to call attention to the fact that we don't debate characters, but their powersets.
That's true, however, most comics have plot holes and characters forgetting what their abilities are in order to keep the stories going.
Take "Onslaught" for example .... that would have lasted about 1 issue if Thor had just decided to use half the power Mjolnir has.
On KMC we debate the powers that characters have been shown to possess without the hindrance of making the match last 6 issues to boost sales.
How many times has the JLA been beaten back until Superman (or whoever) decided that he wasn't going to hold back anymore? ... we're simply starting with them not holding back and not forgetting what they can do or what they have done in the past.
be nice if a forum rule were added that went something like:
all feats are vaild in any argument, but they must have been performed by said character at least 3 times and at least once in the last 5 or so years . . .
pulling powers that haven't been seen in 40 years, and using one-time-only feats DOES get a bit ridiculous at times . . .
CIS is a valid argument, on this forum (or any other, I would assume). If people are constantly using "bloodlust" rules, it's the posters' fault, not the forum's.
Also, creating minimums such as This:
Originally posted by leonidas
[b]all feats are vaild in any argument, but they must have been performed by said character at least 3 times and at least once in the last 5 or so years . . .[/B]
...would be arbitrary and pointless (no offense leo). Part of comic debating revolves around what is and isn't valid. Why would I be in a better position to determine that than anyone else?
...
You personally decide how you'll debate, and what kinds of arguments you consider valid and/or invalid. Forum guidelines are secondary to how you conduct yourself. "The fault, dear Brutus, lies not in our stars but in ourselves."
Originally posted by leonidas
be nice if a forum rule were added that went something like:[b]all feats are vaild in any argument, but they must have been performed by said character at least 3 times and at least once in the last 5 or so years . . .
pulling powers that haven't been seen in 40 years, and using one-time-only feats DOES get a bit ridiculous at times . . . [/B]
After viewing this thread I have a few things to say....
A. Let's just re-name this thread to 'Uni's bitching thread'
B. If you dislike KMC's 'system' so much then haul your ass back to CBR where you can see if Ichigo and Naruto can take out the Incredible Hulk
C. Xmeat , your a joke no one cares. Just get back to thinking the hulk can kill Superman and then KMC can get it's fanboy quota back up to it's usual amount.
D. Masterbruce , you just don't seem to learn. When people are JUST starting to think your alright you start acting like a douche and we have to bring up your little 'transgression' as 'Batman-lite'.
E. Finally , Digi when is this getting locked ?
Originally posted by grey fox
Hellz NO !Even with a full clone + chidori attack AND Hollow Ichigo attack it would only be a 4/10
I'm not sure what that means, but it seems even more misplaced than the thread was, even to begin with.
So....in that case...
A chikamatsu ryu chonin attack would seal the deal on the Hulk for at least 9/10. Banner'd get one shotted.