Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Semantics..
No, you being flat out wrong has nothing to do with semantics...
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Empty statement. You can ask me why since I know you contain high degrees of difficulty picking up on obvious vagueness (The oxymoron effectively applies, I can explain that too. Most likely in Layman's terms for your unbalanced mind.)
Translation: "I can't come up with an actual retort to that fact so I'm gonna blow smoke up your ass instead and use big words like they apply to the fact that spiderman has only "owned" wolvie in non fights a majority of the time".... 🙄
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Ignorance to physics, Appealing to a non sequitur.
Nonsense: nothing is of logical concequence where it concerns mutant superpowers and mutations in a fitionalized comic book media.. nice try though...
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Only one bone goes up the column of the neck: The spine.
One bone? The spine consists of 24 vertebrae, the neck;housing 7 of them, not "one bone" 🤨
Yeah but you want to go on about "non sequitur" like you have some clue as to what you're talking about...
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
In order to break a neck, the spinal bone/cord does not have to be damaged or even remotely broken.
So, yeah. You're damn ignorant and you don't know what you're talking about, which is NO surprise.
And yes, Spiderman had the chance to absolutely tear Wolverines neck innards into mince. He can bench press Toyota's. Get realistic.
Ahh well you DO appear the expert.. Seeing how the neck is made up of one bone according to you.... 😐
But please, do enlighten me on exactly what you think was going to happen.
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
None of your oversized posts contain irrelevant semantics and reckless debates can save you from me now, son.
Son.... riiight.
let me say this AGAIN:
And if the Spinal cord is the issue, let me say this, SABRETOOTH HAS ALREADY TRIED THE EXACT. SAME. THING........ DID NOT WORK.... period!
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Hahaha, you're an idiots. Marvel Team-Up was a series. Spidey and Wolverine fought twice. Spiderman owned him twice in a row.
I'm an "idiots", as in more than one? 😂
Dude, you realize how ridiculous you're making yourself sound right now do you not?
Yes, there have been two volumes of marvel team up.... NEVER has a fight between Wolverine or Spiderman taken place the way that you have described.. PERIOD...
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Strawman fallacy. Where in the hell did I say Spiderman MADE Wolverine stab himself?
No, a strawman fallacy is when I attack an argument you never made.. However, I attacked an argument you DID make... when you made it
here:
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Um, Spiderman has had instances were he has owned Wolverine (Smashing his head into tombstone and chance to break neck in SVSW, Knocking him unconcious in MTU and making him stab himself almost to death in MTU)
pffft.. 🙄
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
If you want to get theoretically technical, HE DID MAKE HIM STAB HIMSELF.
No he didn't... that was Wolverine's decision to make.
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Wolverine had to shank himself to get free of the webbing, you ignoramus. Spiderman placed the webbing there. He subliminally and essentially made Wolverine stab himself, to a circumstantial extent.
I'm an ignoramous because you've been forced to backpeddle and rationalize on an argument you F'd up? LMAO
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Can you come back when you can debate?
You couldn't even correctly call me out on a Strawman and you want me to learn how to debate? 😂
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
No, not really. Spiderman had the chance to kill Wolverine and Wolverine had that chance. Your inconclusive and inconsequential rebuttals do not assist you in any way, shape or form to change that whatsoever.
No they ARE conclusive, seeing how Sabretooth tried the same tactic and Wolverine still fought back.
They ARE consequential, since when Spiderman would have tried and failed he would have died.. He was in a losing position period. There's nothing to debate there.
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
They AGREED in the DAMN COMIC BOOK they had stalemated.
Yes and Spiderman also said Wolverine might be faster than himself.
Deadpool says he's the worlds greatest lover.
Blob says no force on earth can move him.
Obviously the comic world is full of those little white lies and that was one of them...
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Don't be biased. Bias is the prominent sign in fanboyism, something you really don't need with you in a debate.
You've straight made up things here in favor of Spiderman, I've stated facts.. which is the more bias trait? 😐
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
More biased crap. Look at you, just listing off all of Sabretooth's feats and leaving Spideys to rot. Fine, why doesn't Spiderman just tear him into shreds with his f*cking POISONOUS set of six razor sharp pincers he has attached to his back.
Leaving Spiderman's to rot? Uhh you've clearly implied that the 4th appearance Sabretooth is equivolent to Sabretooth as he came to be as a more devoloped character; THAT'S BIASED... Stating Sabretooth's known and STATED capabilities is not BIAS that's FACTS at play.
And since you asked spiderman can't do that
Cause 1: he doesn't have 6 of them.
2: they're not poisionous.
3: He doesn't even have them anymore or the suit they came with.
4: because anytime spidey would try to engage Sabretooth in hand to hand he would die.
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Stop seeking excuses. Sabretooth was in the hospital as a cause of fighting Spiderman. Don't you understand this? Another incident of Spidermans webbing inadvertently causing a loss or serious harm.
Excuses? He was in the hospital BECAUSE he didn't have a healing factor. 😐
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Ad Hominem, Logical Fallacy..
Ad Hominem like you calling me an ignoramous?
Logical Fallacy like you comparing 4th appearance Sabretooth to a fully character-devoloped Sabes?
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
You go look that up now while I sulk and wait for you to come back with another half assed retort that I can bury.
I don't think me looking up words I already know is going to help you understand them better, or make you're argument look any more valid.. 😬
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Don't displace this as shoddy arrogance, but when it comes to debating, you're out of your league here.Sorry, son.
Clearly. I mean you're practically a philosophical spinal surgeon, how could I ever compete.. 🙄