homophobia...

Started by Nellinator15 pages

Originally posted by Alliance
First of all, your cousin is full of BS. "disorder" "disfunction" and "un-natural" are all the opposite of homosexuality.

If you express dislike of gays, thats homophobia. If someone said "I don't like black people," that is a racist statement.

That depends on what you mean by disfunction and it depends on the homosexual in question. In the case of an underdeveloped hypothalamus it is possibly a brain development disfunction.

And he never said that he disliked gays. It wasn't specified. It could be limited to disliking homosexuality.

Main Entry: ho·mo·pho·bia
Pronunciation: "hO-m&-'fO-bE-&
Function: noun
: irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals

OMFG WHO KEEPS RAISING THESE THREADS?!

Whirly? Is it Whirly?! I WILL HUNT DOWN HIS CHILDREN AND EAT THEM.

Originally posted by Strangelove
Main Entry: ho·mo·pho·bia
Pronunciation: "hO-m&-'fO-bE-&
Function: noun
: irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals

Yes, we know it means.

My cousin thought it was unnatural and it might be a disorder OR a brain dysfunction. He did not express fear, aversion or discrimination. He expressed his opinion which happened to have no relevance to anything described as homophobia.

Originally posted by BackFire
merged with other homophobia thread.

Oh, also - Both your cousin and your friend is wrong.

Your cousin is wrong because it IS natural, as in, it happens in nature, regularly.

Your friend is just giving a knee jerk response, your cousin may be ignorant, but he isn't necessarily inherently homophobic because he simply disagrees with it.

I agree. I see a lot of this happen as well. Someone comes along and expresses an opinion on homophobia being a disorder or dysfunction and they're labelled as homophobic. I think it's a cop out, to be honest.

Originally posted by Sorgo X
Yes, we know it means.

My cousin thought it was unnatural and it might be a disorder OR a brain dysfunction. He did not express fear, aversion or discrimination. He expressed his opinion which happened to have no relevance to anything described as homophobia.

just removing all doubt 😉

it's not a disorder. just like some people like ketchup on their burgers, some like having their poop pushed in.

Originally posted by Sorgo X
Yes, we know it means.

My cousin thought it was unnatural and it might be a disorder OR a brain dysfunction. He did not express fear, aversion or discrimination. He expressed his opinion which happened to have no relevance to anything described as homophobia.

could be that he needs to seek out junk science to justify his prejudice/homophobia. or maybe he's just an idiot who likes spouting random baseless theories. you have to ask yourself "what drives/motivates him", to consciously eliminate other possibilities and arrive to his own legless conclusion that its "unnatural"?

It is a new word that liberals made up so they have a name to cal someone who is againist gay marriages and people who pratise being gay.
Look in the old dictionarys it is not going to b e there.Look it up in the new dictionary not there either.Made up word like I said!jm

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
It is a new word that liberals made up so they have a name to cal someone who is againist gay marriages and people who pratise being gay.
Look in the old dictionarys it is not going to b e there.Look it up in the new dictionary not there either.Made up word like I said!jm

try learning to spell. it helps when using dictionaries, as you will neither find a definition for "againist", "pratise",nor "dictionarys"
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/homophobia

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
It is a new word that liberals made up so they have a name to cal someone who is againist gay marriages and people who pratise being gay.
Look in the old dictionarys it is not going to b e there.Look it up in the new dictionary not there either.Made up word like I said!jm

Actually, you're just stuck in the 1600s. BACK TO THE KITCHEN!

Originally posted by Schecter
try learning to spell. it helps when using dictionaries, as you will neither find a definition for "againist", "pratise",nor "dictionarys"
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/homophobia

You found that online not in a book.I bet it is a new word written in the dictionary it still has no meaning or any use to even be part of a word of a meaning.jm 🙂

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
You found that online not in a book.I bet it is a new word written in the dictionary it still has no meaning or any use to even be part of a word of a meaning.jm 🙂

yeah, ok. in other words you have a not-so-unique talent of brain defecation. wonderful. thanks for your input.

brain poop? is that like word vomit?

That is not a word either.How can anyone go around making up words and expecting the liberals to put it in the dictionary?Horrible!Got to go now bye.jm

You're an idiot.

please respond to my earlier comment. 13

whats not a word? poop? 😂

No the two words together Brain Poop!really got to go.jm

Originally posted by Schecter
could be that he needs to seek out junk science to justify his prejudice/homophobia. or maybe he's just an idiot who likes spouting random baseless theories. you have to ask yourself "what drives/motivates him", to consciously eliminate other possibilities and arrive to his own legless conclusion that its "unnatural"?

He is not homophobic.

Wow, you're just as ignorant as the sap who called my cousin homophobic.

It's his opinion that homosexuality is a brain disorder or a mere dysfunction. There's a possibility it could be true, but I doubt that, personally speaking.

Originally posted by Sorgo X
He is not homophobic.

didnt directly imply that he is. i also left the possibility that he's just a retard.

Originally posted by Sorgo X
Wow, you're just as ignorant as the sap who called my cousin homophobic.

how relevant. now, why dont you cry about it, toto?

Originally posted by Sorgo X
It's his opinion that homosexuality is a brain disorder or a mere dysfunction.

i love how you try to equally weigh baseless uneducated opinions with scientific hypothesis/theory.
many klansmen are of the 'opinion' that blacks are of another species of subhumans. is it valid hypothesis?

Originally posted by Sorgo X
There's a possibility it could be true, but I doubt that, personally speaking.

yeah, thanks for that. theres a possibility that in some distant galaxy on some remote planet there is a race of flying pig-men. lets make a thread about it.

I want to discuss flying pig-men...