Originally posted by Ana P
What is that from?
Originally posted by Badabing
nutnut No, I'm not the person trying to apply real world science to comics. So, you're confused durThat's right! Smurph's my posse. 😎
Ok, fine. So you don't understand what I'm saying.
There is NO WHERE in my post where I'm applying science logic to comic books.
I'm applying science logic to what Kandy said about radiating energy and how it makes sense because the universe is expanding. I'm responding to that. I'm responding to his interpretation of the word radiating, because it must have a source.
Did I apply that logic to the comic book? NO. I post here very infrequently. There are better things to do with one's time than to sit around puting science proofs into comic books. Apparently that happens enough around here that no one gets the benefit of the doubt.
I got a question. Wasn't Prime(golden one) stated to be the TRUE God in Dc? If this is true doesn't it mean Prime>Micheal>Galactus???
When disputing about prime you have to understand that you can't rely on feats. Why would DC make a hero who is the strongest, and basicly the unbeatable?
They should Superman Prime defeat Solaris Who I believe is on par with Galactus when Hungry, and a little below average. When you look at what Prime did to Solaris, then you have to imagine how strong he really is.
IMO I think that Superman Prime>>>>>All as he represent god.
