Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
the IG is stated to make the wearer replace eternity. As in universal power. Not infinite multiversal power.
The bull shit continues to flow.
Jeez I came in today, and all I see is you making stuff up, running on empty speculations and repeating self proclaimed senseless ideas as Marvel fact. 🙄
Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
This was one of my points. That Reed using the UN set out to destroy and recreate the Multiverse. Quasar set out to destroy the magus only. And quasar says on panel, that if he fails, he could destroy the Universe. Quasar Admitting on panel the power he is using is Universal in destruction. Mister Master was the one who said that quasar has cosmic senses. So quasar would know how much power the UN is about to pump out at the time of it's use. Game set and match. Quasar using the UN was NOT the same lvl of power as when Reed used it. Thus The IG is not Multiversal and Not Superior to Current UN. Current UN>>>>Classic UN.
Now to be fair, did Quasar try and recreate the multi-verse?
yes he would know it would only destroy one universe if it went out of controll,because thats maybe how much he used?
But it cant be proven
IG> one universe unless they have an IG of their own
Two UN's with different users -depends on who
Originally posted by Galan007
And where is it stated, that all the IG can replace is one Eternity? 😕Do I sense you making things up again?
Now you guys want to play the numbers game and silly shit when you realize that i"m just quoting what was in the book. IT said that the user replaced Eternity. No one else. Not infinity, not MultiEternity.
Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
Now you guys want to play the numbers game and silly shit when you realize that i"m just quoting what was in the book. IT said that the user replaced Eternity. No one else. Not infinity, not MultiEternity.
You'll be called out everytime you make stuff up about Marvel.
You may get away with that concerning DC,
but never Marvel, not on my watch.
Thanos ONLY wanted ONE Universe.
Thanos ONLY wanted to supplant Eternity's Position.
Do you NOW understand?
It's not like I haven't told you this before and proved it, but no, you have continue to pursue your agenda.
Well all can see what the truth is.
Originally posted by Mr Master
You'll be called out everytime you make stuff up about Marvel.You may get away with that concerning DC,
but never Marvel, not on my watch.
Thanos ONLY wanted ONE Universe.
Thanos ONLY wanted to supplant Eternity's Position.
Do you NOW understand?
It's not like I haven't told you this before and proved it, but no, you have continue to pursue your agenda.
Well all can see what the truth is.
LMAO you think i'm one of your nincompoop cronies who you can just tell stuff too? Get the **** out of here. You see something on panel and it's ur interpretation or and **** everyone else with a brain. Im not making shit up. ANd you saying I may get away with that shit about DC is implying I make shit up? **** you, It's been proven that I know my DC shit. While you continue to try and disprove me about anything I say about dc and you will come away looking retarded. Like your dumb ass did when you said mxy only erased one multiverse. You silly tard. The DCU animated is an entirely different Multiverse all it's own. As is vertigo, and the Kingdome, and tanget and the infinite earths. Now I understand this< I am not some dummy who just sits a corner while the master comes up with these rediculous claims of the marvel hierachy. You can get your claim from something else as far as I'm concerned. No where on panel does it say he killed multideath. Just like on panel, you try and tell me thanos only wanted one universe. That is the most absurd thing I have ever heard. That even goes against THanos character. What the **** would he only want one universe for? Now it' sup to you to prove the IG indeed could beat Multieternity. Especially since there are other IG's out there with in the MultiEternity. Now U can kiss my grits. Two snaps and a circle!!!!
When an UN-Mentally fit Warlock acquired the IG,
it wasn't Eternity that challenged him, it wasn't Multi-Eternity either, nor any other being or Entity.
The MOST Powerful being in the Omniverse had to interfere.
Yea sure the IG isn't Multiversal.
Yet it commands the attention of TOAA himself.
"let it be known, the Power that the Living Tribunal represents (TOAA)
will never agian allow the Gems to be used in unison"
swank
Originally posted by Mr Master
When an UN-Mentally fit Warlock acquired the IG,it wasn't Eternity that challenged him, it wasn't Multi-Eternity either, nor any other being or Entity.
The MOST Powerful being in the Omniverse had to interfere.
Yea sure the IG isn't Multiversal.
Yet it commands the attention of TOAA himself.
"let it be known, the Power that the Living Tribunal represents (TOAA)
will never agian allow the Gems to be used in unison"
swank
That's all cute. But doesn't really concern me as you think i'm some fool who you can muddle the argument with things that have nothing to do with the debate. The LT has interfered with universal things before. Get that shit out of here. Example, KOrvak.
Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
That's all cute. But doesn't really concern me as you think i'm some fool who you can muddle the argument with things that have nothing to do with the debate. The LT has interfered with universal things before. Get that shit out of here. Example, KOrvak.
WRONG!!!
Korvac was a threat to the Multiversal Balance by making changes in the Universe he conquered, that's why.
Warlock was NOT messing with any Universe, nor did Warlock upset the balance.
LT interfered because of Warlock ALONE.
NEVER has the LT interfered with a being for other than threatening the Balance.
GO READ COMICS!!!
Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
Sorry. I"m pissed at that other fella.
I'm sorry if this fella owns you and spanks you without mercy, but you have a big mouth, and you've talked mad shit about me all over the forum.
This is my revenge, bringing to light how much fallacy you spew, and how you eat your words consistently.
