Should dogs, cats, or horses be sold as food

Originally posted by Robtard
Huh... Dogs and humans (and every other animal) both have certain biological factors/differences that relate to which types of foods they are designed to eat. Correct?

Awww, is someone sore?

Not just a meat diet, (proper/healthy) meat included as part of your diet is good for you.

Pointless question as this relates to meat being essential to humans, it's not.

Not sore, just looking to keep you from making assinine associations and assumptions.

State your case, logically with facts and not with I feel, I see, I think but with facts and we can go from there. I have yet to see you do that, amaze me with your wizardry of knowledge with diet/nutrition and health and how meat fits into all that and is "essential" to "health" as you keep saying.

Originally posted by Soleran
Pointless question as this relates to meat being essential to humans, it's not.

Not sore, just looking to keep you from making assinine associations and assumptions.

State your case, logically with facts and not with I feel, I see, I think but with facts and we can go from there. I have yet to see you do that, amaze me with your wizardry of knowledge with diet/nutrition and health and how meat fits into all that and is "essential" to "health" as you keep saying.

Listen, if you don't or can't answer the question: that's fine, but why do you keep going on about that, "we" weren't/aren't debating "Essential to eat meat" anymore, as REPEATEDLY noted, "We've discussed that." and I do not think it is essential (as in survival) as non-meat eaters do exist... I have also repeatedly said so (see page 4 and beyond), so why you're agruing on something we both agree on is beyond me.

How sweet, but no need to do me any favors, worry about yourself as you're having trouble understanding that we've moved past "Essential to eat meat".

See above (and previous) post as we've moved past "essential to eat meat" and using biology is logical.

U can eat horse over here.
Salami

lol

They are having that nationwide pet food recall. Maybe they had too many horse parts in them.

edit.

Wrong thread.

have you guys taken a step back and looked at what you are arguing over?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
have you guys taken a step back and looked at what you are arguing over?

Why do you enlighten us; as a favor?

i just think you guys are getting all worked up over a silly topic. debating it is understandable, i am all for that, but actually getting mad about it. what the hell? ....just forget i said anything, i am probably out of line.....

heres my ten cents: dogs, cats, and horses being sold as food....there are a lot of stray dogs and cats out there, and when horses get old they put them down. SO......i think that these strays and old horses should be canned up and sent to third world countries as food. but i dont think that they should be sold in the states, or anywhere else where food is plentily vaailable.

It's up to them or anyone how they wish to debate, let's not allow THAT to become topic for discussion here.

Stick to "food", as you have done.

I find it odd how people feel human meat is the one meat that should never be thought of as food. I consider that odd.

-AC

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
i just think you guys are getting all worked up over a silly topic. debating it is understandable, i am all for that, but actually getting mad about it. what the hell? ....just forget i said anything, i am probably out of line.....

heres my ten cents: dogs, cats, and horses being sold as food....there are a lot of stray dogs and cats out there, and when horses get old they put them down. SO......i think that these strays and old horses should be canned up and sent to third world countries as food. but i dont think that they should be sold in the states, or anywhere else where food is plentily vaailable.

I can't speak for others, but I am not getting "worked up" and I am certainly not mad; it's called debate.

You want to send third world countries meats we don't readily eat ourselves? How "kind" of you... America and other countries destroy millions and millions of pounds of produce and live stock every single year in order to keep the market price at a certain level, if anything; it'd be better for those countries to ship that food to the 3rd world (my opinion).

well, that too, obviously, i assumed that went without saying.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
well, that too, obviously, i assumed that went without saying.

When you "assume(d)" you make an 'ass' out of 'u' and 'me(d)'. 🙂

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I find it odd how people feel human meat is the one meat that should never be thought of as food. I consider that odd.

-AC

Not "never" as certain situations dictate that cannibalism to be acceptable.

Originally posted by Robtard
When you "assume" you make an 'ass' out of 'u' and 'me'. 🙂

Not "never" as certain situations dictate that cannibalism to be acceptable.

Originally posted by Robtard
When you "assume(d)" you make an 'ass' out of 'u' and 'me(d)'. 🙂

You could have lost the 'd' there, mate.

Or at least altered the verb.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
You could have lost the 'd' there, mate.

Or at least altered the verb.

I was quoting him hence the reason I stuck to [verbatim] "assumed" and not the correct 'assume'; the parenthesis are there to reflect that... Rogue Jedi certainly understood as he didn't say "Who's Med?" in his comical response.

But thanks for looking out for me mate; do you do this for everyone or and I just that lucky?

a comic? i've been called worse.

Originally posted by Robtard
I was quoting him hence the reason I stuck to [verbatim] "assumed" and not the correct 'assume'; the parenthesis are there to reflect that... Rogue Jedi certainly understood as he didn't say "Who's Med?" in his comical response.

But thanks for looking out for me mate; do you do this for everyone or and I just that lucky?

Not everyone gets to stand in the light.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Not everyone gets to stand in the light.

So, am I that lucky or not?

Here's what I wonder.

Why does the title have no question mark?

Also, the conjunction suggests that we should choose one, rather than answer in the negative or affirmative.

good point. i just caught that.