Is superman really invulnerable?

Started by Eel O'Brien5 pages
Originally posted by jalek moye
Thor 😖hifty:

😆

Superman answers your question 🙂

No being is completely invulnerable/invincible. As shown many times in comics, he can be hurt by beings as strong, or stronger than him. Plus, the fact that kryptonite and magic can hurt him makes this whole thread moot.

invulneabilty is nothing but moluecule density. a scientific genius could come up with weapon that will pierce through his invulneabilty.

It's not his molecules that are dense, it's a psionic body field that's like, a few millimeters away from his skin, it takes the blows that he shrugs off like nothing, but it has been broken through on multiple occasions. One of the latest being Atlas.

Actually Atlas used magic to break it, since magic is one of his weaknesses.

Anyway, his durability is a combination of his forcefield and his body

Originally posted by Endless Mike
Actually Atlas used magic to break it, since magic is one of his weaknesses.

Anyway, his durability is a combination of his forcefield and his body

aye, plus, atlas had help...

Originally posted by KingD19
It's not his molecules that are dense, it's a psionic body field that's like, a few millimeters away from his skin, it takes the blows that he shrugs off like nothing, but it has been broken through on multiple occasions. One of the latest being Atlas.

dose superman have psionc powers

Originally posted by beast1234
dose superman have psionc powers

His powers were explained as partly psionic in the past. I'm not sure if that has survived Infinite Crisis...

His invulnerability is explained as a supercharged bioelectric "aura" which acts as an invisible "force field" around his body.

And in the past he has had hypnosis abilities, but they were vague.

Originally posted by Eel O'Brien
His powers were explained as partly psionic in the past. I'm not sure if that has survived Infinite Crisis...

for the most part people and writers ignore that because its stupid. Like the whole he doesn't lift things its his mind and stuff

Originally posted by KingD19
His invulnerability is explained as a supercharged bioelectric "aura" which acts as an invisible "force field" around his body.

And in the past he has had hypnosis abilities, but they were vague.

then in that case i will create a weapon that will remove the the electron from his atoms or create a formula that will stop his cells from produceing electromagnetic radtion.

No.

Originally posted by KingD19
His invulnerability is explained as a supercharged bioelectric "aura" which acts as an invisible "force field" around his body.

And in the past he has had hypnosis abilities, but they were vague.

That plus his atoms are more dense, at the subatomic level. It allows him to take unbeliavable damage even after his bio aura has been breached.

Superman is invulnerable to supernova but never forget that he can be hurt and knock out. In the latest Justice League 30, Superman was knocked out by a moon busting. So that makes his range of being knock out is from moon busting to supernova. Getting knock out and receiving an attack without getting hurt are two different things.

Originally posted by nij-ayias
Superman is invulnerable to supernova but never forget that he can be hurt and knock out. In the latest Justice League 30, Superman was knocked out by a moon busting. So that makes his range of being knock out is from moon busting to supernova. Getting knock out and receiving an attack without getting hurt are two different things.

he actually is normally above that level. it was a low showing, hes normally way farther then that.

Originally posted by jalek moye
he actually is normally above that level. it was a low showing, hes normally way farther then that.

Low showing doesn't necessary mean ignoring limits that was shown in the comics, low showing things were words not used by any Superman writers. What I'm talking about is his limit in getting knocked out, if you can show any scan that Superman withstand a supernova without getting knocked out, then I'm wrong. In Justice League of America 30, it was pretty clear that Superman's limit in getting knocked out was a 81 billion tons moon buster.

Originally posted by nij-ayias
Low showing doesn't necessary mean ignoring limits that was shown in the comics, low showing things were words not used by any Superman writers. What I'm talking about is his limit in getting knocked out, [b]if you can show any scan that Superman withstand a supernova without getting knocked out, then I'm wrong. In Justice League of America 30, it was pretty clear that Superman's limit in getting knocked out was a 81 billion tons moon buster. [/B]

Seriously you want to consider Mc Duffie fact....a factual fact....

Originally posted by skygunner41
Seriously you want to consider Mc Duffie fact....a factual fact....

Seriously, you don't want to accept fact in comics.

Originally posted by nij-ayias
Seriously, you don't want to accept fact in comics.

So Surfer armbar should be used after all Mc Duffie write it and a couple very interesting Mc Duffie fact also plausible to use.It really what you said.