New Abortion law, about ultra-sounds...

Started by Robtard17 pages

Originally posted by Flame On!!
I merely replied to your post 😬 Why be touchy.

We could do that all day. You're touchy enough said.

-FO!!

Originally posted by Robtard
Ignoring what I say and implying I said something else in order to bait me is pathetic. You've done it repeatedly and I've not played along with your little games, you're better off trying it on someone else if you must do it.

Well if that's what I was doing which it is not. You would be playing along.

😬

-FO!!

Originally posted by Flame On!!
Well if that's what I was doing which it is not. You would be playing along.

😬

-FO!!

Originally posted by Robtard
Ignoring what I say and implying I said something else in order to bait me is pathetic. You've done it repeatedly and I've not played along with your little games, you're better off trying it on someone else if you must do it.

Even bolding a previous post would be playing along. It's a good thing i'm not otherwise you would feel pretty silly about now.

🙂

-FO!!

Originally posted by Flame On!!
Even bolding a previous post would be playing along. It's a good thing i'm not otherwise you would feel pretty silly about now.

🙂

-FO!!

Originally posted by Robtard
Ignoring what I say and implying I said something else in order to bait me is pathetic . You've done it repeatedly and I've not played along with your little games , you're better off trying it on someone else if you must do it.

well have fun with that i'm stopping posting because you are just spamming this thread now.

🙂

-FO!!

Originally posted by Flame On!!
well have fun with that i'm stopping posting because you are just spamming this thread now.

🙂

-FO!!

Originally posted by Robtard
Ignoring what I say and implying I said something else in order to bait me is pathetic. You've done it repeatedly and I've not played along with your little games, you're better off trying it on someone else if you must do it.

Stop spamming Robtard.

-FO!!

Originally posted by Flame On!!
Stop spamming Robtard.

-FO!!


Originally posted by Robtard
Ignoring what I say and implying I said something else in order to bait me is pathetic . You've done it repeatedly and I've not played along with your little games, you're better off trying it on someone else if you must do it.

1. If the government is paying for the ultra-sound then more Taxes for us......not good

2. If the patient does its up to them

3. Free country my butt

4. There are already way to many kids in foster care so abortion should be a option for those who choose it

5. It's reverse phsychology, which means in turn the women may feel over whelmed and keep it even if they know they can't afford.........more taxes to keep welfare an option

SO here'e the gist.............The government is going way too far with the can and can't do's it's getting out of control. Should't they be concentrating on other things like getting troops out of Iraq or finding more jobs for people on welfare and people who have lost their jobs due to lay offs?

Originally posted by FeceMan
I believe what Sithy is saying is that she knew what she was doing in having intercourse and thus she must accept full responsibility for her actions. Her being raped is an exception to this.
With regard to the actual topic, the original legislation doesn't provide for exceptions in the case of rape nor incest, as I understand it.
i.e.
You were subject to sexual trauma, therefore you're obligated to view images of the product of that sexual assault, in attempt to dissuade you from terminating said product after you've already made a decision to do so, because you have fertile reproductive organs and sufficient nutrition to maintain a pregnancy.

I do love that little argument.

"She must accept responsibility.".

As if getting pregnant isn't being forced to accept it enough.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I do love that little argument.

"She must accept responsibility.".

As if getting pregnant isn't being forced to accept it enough.

-AC

True, true!!

-FO!!

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
With regard to the actual topic, the original legislation doesn't provide for exceptions in the case of rape nor incest, as I understand it.
i.e.
You were subject to sexual trauma, therefore you're obligated to view images of the product of that sexual assault, in attempt to dissuade you from terminating said product after you've already made a decision to do so, because you have fertile reproductive organs and sufficient nutrition to maintain a pregnancy.

I don't think women who were raped should have abortions, but I also think that the government should do everything that's possible to help them out in the situation.

Originally posted by FeceMan
I don't think women who were raped should have abortions, but I also think that the government should do everything that's possible to help them out in the situation.

Why not you? Why don't you adopt a kid if you're that concerned?

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Why not you? Why don't you adopt a kid if you're that concerned?

-AC


That has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand.

Originally posted by FeceMan
That has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand.

Helping mothers out who you feel should not have abortions, is what you brought up. I'm asking why you don't do so, by adopting a kid.

Answer the question.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Helping mothers out who you feel should not have abortions, is what you brought up. I'm asking why you don't do so, by adopting a kid.

Answer the question.

-AC


Ad hominem. You'd do better attacking the argument.

Originally posted by FeceMan
I don't think women who were raped should have abortions, but I also think that the government should do everything that's possible to help them out in the situation.

What? You think someone who's been raped should have to carry the child of the rapist to term and then raise it? Are you serious?

Maybe they should make the rapist raise it as the penalty for the crime.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
What? You think someone who's been raped should have to carry the child of the rapist to term and then raise it? Are you serious?

Maybe they should make the rapist raise it as the penalty for the crime.


but I also think that the government should do everything that's possible to help them out in the situation.

So, to answer your question, yes.