Originally posted by Naz
Even with Sanc being 15, we'd still be in the same grade and all. I think so anyway. 😑
Originally posted by §P0oONYIt's probably gone through her mind to. shrug
That still means nothing. You're missing the point. In England, if Sanc and Bardock were to have sex at their current age. It's paedophilia. Now I'm not saying that they will but I can damn well say with 100% certainty that it's gone through his mind. (Simply because it's impossible for it not to have if you're hanging out with a girl on a 1-on-1 basis.)
Originally posted by §P0oONY
That still means nothing. You're missing the point. In England, if Sanc and Bardock were to have sex at their current age. It's paedophilia. Now I'm not saying that they will but I can damn well say with 100% certainty that it's gone through his mind. (Simply because it's impossible for it not to have if you're hanging out with a girl on a 1-on-1 basis.)
It would not be pedophilia, it'd be statutory rape. Pedophilia is an attraction to prepubescent children...which teenagers generally are not.
Originally posted by Les yeux clos
It's probably gone through her mind to. shrug
Originally posted by Lana
It would not be pedophilia, it'd be statutory rape. Pedophilia is an attraction to prepubescent children...which teenagers generally are not.
Originally posted by §P0oONYI realise that legally he'd be responsible, but that doesn't mean that she, personally, is not able to make an informed decision about whether she sleeps with someone or not.
But she is 15... She's not responsible. Not legally anyway.Really makes little difference. Rapists and Paedophiles are both shitty things to be.
Paedophilia and statuary rape are pretty different things. 😬
And in all fairness, they probably haven't slept together nor are going to for a while, so it really shouldn't bother you very much.
Originally posted by Les yeux clos
I realise that legally he'd be responsible, but that doesn't mean that she, personally, is not able to make an informed decision about whether she sleeps with someone or not.Paedophilia and statuary rape are pretty different things. 😬
And in all fairness, they probably haven't slept together nor are going to for a while, so it really shouldn't bother you very much.
I understand that they are different things. Paedophilia for one is not actually against the law. The fact is that them being different really doesn't effect the point I'm trying to make.
I'm not targeting these two, I'm talking about the scenario in general terms. Bardock seems like a pretty sensible guy, I have no doubts about his motives being just. I'd just like him to look at it from a 3rd party perspective.