Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Fact: amino acids will not link together to form proteins outside of already living cells.Fact: living things only come from living things (Law of Biogenesis).
Fact: Neither of those statements have anything remotely close to addressing my point.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Fact: amino acids will not link together to form proteins outside of already living cells.
You have no way of knowing that. Have you gone into deep space and checked? I didn’t think so.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Fact: living things only come from living things (Law of Biogenesis).
That is not a law of any kind. We don’t even know what life is beyond Earth. The possibilities are staggering.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Fact: DNA does not form outside of already living cells either.
You cannot prove that. There is no way to prove a negative. All you can say is that on Earth, DNA is found within a cell. It doesn’t even matter if it is living. DNA can be found in dead cells.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Fact: amino acids will not link together to form proteins outside of already living cells.Fact: living things only come from living things (Law of Biogenesis).
You just seem to be repeating yourself. Who cannot handle the truth now?
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You have no way of knowing that. Have you gone into deep space and checked? I didn’t think so.That is not a law of any kind. We don’t even know what life is beyond Earth. The possibilities are staggering.
You cannot prove that. There is no way to prove a negative. All you can say is that on Earth, DNA is found within a cell. It doesn’t even matter if it is living. DNA can be found in dead cells.
You just seem to be repeating yourself. Who cannot handle the truth now?
Why do I need to go into space to prove anything? Everything that I need is right here on earth.
There is no evidence of life outside of earth.
Show me one instance of DNA (forming) outside of a living cell. My proof is inherent in my statement.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Why do I need to go into space to prove anything? Everything that I need is right here on earth.There is no evidence of life outside of earth.
Show me one instance of DNA (forming) outside of a living cell. My proof is inherent in my statement.
I don't think life needs DNA. I believe that life is all though out the universe, but we can't reorganize it. Why isn't a rock alive? Prove me wrong. You can't, because you can't prove a negative. All you can say is that the life we reorganize as life on this planet has DNA. We don't even know if that was always the case.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I don't think life needs DNA. I believe that life is all though out the universe, but we can't reorganize it. Why isn't a rock alive? Prove me wrong. You can't, because you can't prove a negative. All you can say is that the life we reorganize as life on this planet has DNA. We don't even know if that was always the case.
You don't think life needs DNA? That sounds like an opinion and we are discussing facts only. You believe life is all throughout the universe? You have more faith than I do for something that cannot be seen (and you criticize Christians?). Why isn't a rock alive? Because God made it non living. It sounds like you have turned to semantics and hairsplitting to maintain this discussion. Don't resort to that find proof instead to back up your claims as I have done.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You might want to check your facts. I believe that Viruses are considered to be living. However, mad-cow is not alive. It is a protein only.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You don't think life needs DNA? That sounds like an opinion and we are discussing facts only.
Saying that there is no life outside of Earth is also an opinion, not backed by fact. You can’t use part of science, and abandon it when it suits you.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You believe life is all throughout the universe? You have more faith than I do for something that cannot be seen (and you criticize Christians?).
I never criticize Christians for having faith, only for being stupid.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Why isn't a rock alive? Because God made it non living.
How do you know a god made the rock in the first place?
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
It sounds like you have turned to semantics and hairsplitting to maintain this discussion. Don't resort to that find proof instead to back up your claims as I have done.
Why should I do any different then you are doing?
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Saying that there is no life outside of Earth is also an opinion, not backed by fact. You can’t use part of science, and abandon it when it suits you.I never criticize Christians for having faith, only for being stupid.
How do you know a god made the rock in the first place?
Why should I do any different then you are doing?
I have stated fact after fact that has yet to be refuted.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Saying that there is no life outside of Earth is also an opinion, not backed by fact. You can’t use part of science, and abandon it when it suits you.I never criticize Christians for having faith, only for being stupid.
How do you know a god made the rock in the first place?
Why should I do any different then you are doing?
Your stance is like someone saying "just because there are no pink, three-eyed, flying elephants anywhere on planet earth does not mean there are none in the universe." Don't you see how ridiculous that sounds? Well that is how your statement about life outside of earth comes across.
Originally posted by King Kandy
That's because when you vomit up a bunch of data it is rarely topic for discussion.Fact: The sky is blue
Fact: The grass is green
Fact: The pope is catholic
WHY IS NOBODY REFUTING MY POINTS?!?!?
Not one of the facts that I posted were random. The facts that I have posted substantiate my claim that life did not originate in a primordial soup. There is a huge difference. I'm not one to digress and shift the discussion to outerspace when the facts become unbearable.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Not one of the facts that I posted were random. The facts that I have posted substantiate my claim that life did not originate in a primordial soup. There is a huge difference. I'm not one to digress and shift the discussion to outerspace when the facts become unbearable.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You've digressed.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I have stated fact after fact that has yet to be refuted.
No, you have not. Just saying it does not make it true.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Your stance is like someone saying "just because there are no pink, three-eyed, flying elephants anywhere on planet earth does not mean there are none in the universe." Don't you see how ridiculous that sounds? Well that is how your statement about life outside of earth comes across.
"Just because there are no pink, three-eyed, flying elephants anywhere on planet earth does not mean there are none in the universe." is a true statement. Just because there are no lobbers on your table, right now, does not mean there are no lobbers in the sea.
Re: Re: Re: Can you handle the Truth?
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
True or False: proteins never form (in nature) outside of living cells
Originally posted by Ordo
Because truth with a clarifier is not truth at all.
Can you respond to my point first before we get into you lack of knowledge about biology 🙂
Originally posted by King Kandy
Fact: The pope is catholicWHY IS NOBODY REFUTING MY POINTS?!?!?
The Pope is ROMAN Catholic
😄