Can you handle the Truth?

Started by Shakyamunison432 pages

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
This is not extraordinary proof to you or is it and you just can't handle it?

How is that extraordinary proof?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
How is that extraordinary proof?

Question: did you watch it before asking me that question?

Originally posted by Ordo
Since there is no such thing as macroevolution in modern scientific theory, its as irrelevant as alchemy.

Semantics?

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Question: did you watch it before asking me that question?

You can't do it because it is not extraordinary proof.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You can't do it because it is not extraordinary proof.

What about this one will you watch this one or dismiss it too?

YouTube video

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
What about this one will you watch this one or dismiss it too?

[]

Why would I want to watch a video?

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I mean you physically.

You physically cannot occupy space in two different places simultaneously. For example, you cannot physically be in Paris France and London England at the same time.

This is an absolute.

of all of the examples I gave for you being in two places, that is the only one that is actually possible.

The physical you, if somehow entangled into some quantum state, could actually occupy two physical places at the same time (or, more specifically, each of your sub-atomic particles might be said to locate two physical places at the same time). In practice it is likely impossible, but in theory it makes sense.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
What about this one will you watch this one or dismiss it too?

YouTube video


If it's worth watching, it's worth you just telling us the content.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Gravity is universal this is an absolute.

False.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Nothing living can continue to live without oxygen is also an absolute.

False.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You cannot be in two places at the same time is also an absolute.

False.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Time is linear and moves as it were in one direction. Hence, you cannot be in the past and in the present simultaneously. This is also an absolute.

Still undergoing research, but I have strong suspicion this may end up being proven false.

Don't feel sad JIA. Missing 3.5 out of four is only like, an F grade right?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Why would I want to watch a video?

Sir Isaac Newton
"This most beautiful system [The Universe] could only proceed from the dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being."

http://www.lostpine.com/quotes/wisdom_037.htm

Albert Einstein
"In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognise, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what makes me really angry is that they quote me for support of such views."

http://www.quotesby.net/Albert-Einstein

"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly."

-Albert Einstein

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Sir Isaac Newton
"This most beautiful system [The Universe] could only proceed from the dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being."

http://www.lostpine.com/quotes/wisdom_037.htm

Albert Einstein
"In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognise, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what makes me really angry is that they quote me for support of such views."

http://www.quotesby.net/Albert-Einstein

Do you even understand what I mean when I say that one man's delusion does not justify another man's delusion? In other words, people can both be believable, intelligent and still be wrong. What we believe shapes the way we see the world.

Not to mention, the little work that Newton did leave behind with regard to spirituality was of an incredibly poor quality, and Einstein is certainly not regarded as an expert on theology.

As physicists and mathematicians they are unquestionable intelligent, maybe not so much as philosophers of religion.

Not to mention, Newton engaged in the occult himself.

shh.... you'll scare him..

Originally posted by King Kandy
False.

False.

False.

Still undergoing research, but I have strong suspicion this may end up being proven false.

Don't feel sad JIA. Missing 3.5 out of four is only like, an F grade right?

You have failed to explain why you believe my examples of real-life absolutes are false.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You are free to believe that if you wish but I choose to believe that the Bible is infallible.

The Bible is given by inspiration of God hence, it is without error.

Okay.

What about Bible versions that don't coincide, how do you explain that? Are you telling me that the re-interpretations are still inspired by God?

Originally posted by King Kandy
"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly."

-Albert Einstein

Albert Einstein
"Quantum mechanics is certainly imposing. But an inner voice tells me that it is not yet the real thing. The theory says a lot, but does not really bring us any closer to the secret of the 'old one'. I, at any rate, am convinced that He does not throw dice."

http://www.quotesby.net/Albert-Einstein

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You have failed to explain why you believe my examples of real-life absolutes are false.

Anaerobic bacteria does not need oxygen to survive. There are other organisms, iirc. So you're wrong with that "absolute."

Originally posted by Robtard
Okay.

What about Bible versions that don't coincide, how do you explain that? Are you telling me that the re-interpretations are still inspired by God?

Bible versions that don't coincide, how do I explain it? I suppose that overzealous people got together to make all these various translations for sake of more clarity and understanding or perhaps the need to try and keep up with the times colloquially.