Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
No you cannot.
I already posted evidence that things beyond the quantum level can exist in two places at once, so you trying to use that as an argument has already been refuted.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
For you it is zero.Fact: there are absolutely no square circles and there are absolutely no round squares.
This is an absolute statement.
All this proves, is that the only way you can make a statement be absolute is to continually give it narrower definitions until it can have no possible exceptions. A tactic you have used several times in this thread.
First example: You said no life can exist without air, and when it was pointed out this was not true you arbitrarily redefined life to only include cells with nuclei.
Second example: You said gravity was the same throughout the universe, and when it was pointed out this was not true you redefined to only include the earth. And when that was shown as false you redefined a second time to only include the earth's surface.
Third example: You said nothing can exist in two places at once, then redefined it to mean that humans cannot exist in two places at once. Then when that was proven false, you redefined it as saying humans cannot exist in two places at once at will.
Originally posted by King Kandy
Only because they are being defined that way.All this proves, is that the only way you can make a statement be absolute is to continually give it narrower definitions until it can have no possible exceptions. A tactic you have used several times in this thread.
First example: You said no life can exist without air, and when it was pointed out this was not true you arbitrarily redefined life to only include cells with nuclei.
Second example: You said gravity was the same throughout the universe, and when it was pointed out this was not true you redefined to only include the earth. And when [B]that
was shown as false you redefined a second time to only include the earth's surface.Third example: You said nothing can exist in two places at once, then redefined it to mean that humans cannot exist in two places at once. Then when that was proven false, you redefined it as saying humans cannot exist in two places at once at will. [/B]
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Absolutes: gravity is universal, air (h2o) is necessary for life, you cannot be in two places at the same time.Now...do you agree with any of those absolutes?
P.S. a sword's edge is an absolute.
😎
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I meant oxygen not h2o just goes to show that I am human.Gravity is universal this is an absolute.
Nothing living can continue to live without oxygen is also an absolute.
You cannot be in two places at the same time is also an absolute.
Time is linear and moves as it were in one direction. Hence, you cannot be in the past and in the present simultaneously. This is also an absolute.
I admitted that I was not being scientific when I said that bacteria is not life as you mean it. I admitted that was I speaking on my personal whim that bacteria is a flimsy example of life because I wanted animal or insect examples which I believe are way more compelling. But you couldn't furnish even one.
I never said that gravity was the same throughout the universe. This is a lie (deliberate) or simply a misunderstanding on your part (unintentional).
I said you cannot be in two place at once and you are a human right?
To prove my point I have provided two of my earliest posts on this discussion.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
*Sigh*Again, quantum mechanics deals with things at the subatomic level. I am not talking about at that level. So your link is not valid.
If you can't be in more than one place in the world at any given time, then why must you exclude quantum mechanics from this world? It must exist in this world along with everything else. 🙄
I don't get it. What is it about a eukaryotic organism that makes it more compelling than a prokaryotic?
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I admitted that I was not being scientific when I said that bacteria is not life as you mean it. I admitted that was I speaking on my personal whim that bacteria is a flimsy example of life because I wanted animal or insect examples which I believe are way more compelling. But you couldn't furnish even one.I never said that gravity was the same throughout the universe. This is a lie (deliberate) or simply a misunderstanding on your part (unintentional).
I said you cannot be in two place at once and you are a human right?
To prove my point I have provided two of my earliest posts on this discussion.
You said it was "universal". If it is NOT the same everywhere, then it is NOT universal. That's the very definition of the word.
"You" could have meant anything as it is often used loosely in conversation. Irrelevant anyway as it is possible for a human to be in two places at once.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
[COLOR=darkblue]Fact: squares are squares and not circles and circles are circles and not squares. This is an absolute statement...
Let me help you with this:
Let us pretend for a moment that there is a very strange square that is a circle. To us, this strange square would look just like a circle, and we would call it a circle. For all we know, half the circles we see could be these strange imaginary squares, but we would never know it. So, to say "squares are squares and not circles" is to ignore the fact that we are the ones defining what squares or circles are in the first place.
Does that help?
Originally posted by ShakyamunisonWhat the ****?
Let me help you with this:Let us pretend for a moment that there is a very strange square that is a circle. To us, this strange square would look just like a circle, and we would call it a circle. For all we know, half the circles we see could be these strange imaginary squares, but we would never know it. So, to say "squares are squares and not circles" is to ignore the fact that we are the ones defining what squares or circles are in the first place.
Does that help?