Originally posted by AngryManatee
For starters, your idea of bats evolving into whales if plain moronic, indicating your lack of credibility on your understanding of the theory. Bats did not evolve from whales and vice versa. Most likely if you compare the two's DNA, you will find that they had a common ancestor some *insert number* million years ago. No I did not sidestep you question, I simply stated that it was a very stupid one, and apparently you didn't understand why., which is why I'm having to sit here and explain why your f u c k i n g question is so f u c k i n g stupid, and it's downright infuriating that you would even have the gall to ask such a question with such lack of own personal information.Now, how would you explain Homo sapiens neandertalensis?
In case you missed it
Edit: So, Homo sapiens neandertalensis.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
So how many transitional fossils would there have to be linking bats to whales?
The fact that you're still asking this question makes me wonder if you're really just a down's kid with one of those Microsoft talk programs. Your question has too many errors for me to consider it (again). Go read a Biology book or a Physical Anthropology book (for science majors).
Originally posted by AngryManatee
The fact that you're still asking this question makes me wonder if you're really just a down's kid with one of those Microsoft talk programs. Your question has too many errors for me to consider it (again). Go read a Biology book or a Physical Anthropology book (for science majors).
So basically there are no transitional fossils linking bats to whales right? If macroevolution did occur (and it didn't) then there ought to be a plethora of transitional fossils for each species considering that you believe that the earth is older than 6,000 years right? So then where are they then?
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
So basically there are no transitional fossils linking bats to whales right? If macroevolution did occur (and it didn't) then there ought to be a plethora of transitional fossils for each species considering that you believe that the earth is older than 6,000 years right? So then where are they then?
You do understand the rarity of which fossils form yes? And again, your making this gross generalization about bats and whales. If you can't give me an intelligible question, then I will not give you an intelligible answer.
Intelligible question: How would you explain Homo neandertalensis? This is the fourth time I've asked you this.
Originally posted by AngryManatee
You do understand the rarity of which fossils form yes? And again, your making this gross generalization about bats and whales. If you can't give me an intelligible question, then I will not give you an intelligible answer.Intelligible question: How would you explain Homo neandertalensis? This is the fourth time I've asked you this.
You are making excuses. A kid could understand my question.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You are making excuses. A kid could understand my question.
A kid would also have no credibility to answer the question (i.e. it would be his uneducated opinion), and would thus give an answer that you would like, or you would correct him if you didn't, and hopefully the kid would realize how much of a crock you are.
Edit: Homoe sapiens neandertalensis? A kid could understand this question.
Originally posted by AngryManatee
A kid would also have no credibility to answer the question, and would thus give an answer that yu would like, or you would correct him if you didn't, and hopefully the kid would realize how much of a crock you are.
More real answers and less name-calling and disdain.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Why aren't there millions of transitional fossils AngryManatee linking all of the species together?
Not all animals leave fossils since you have to have the proper setting for fossilization to occur. As I stated before, not all animals leave fossils behind, ESPECIALLY small ones.
So, Homo sapiens neandertalensis? Is this the 5th or 6th time?
Originally posted by AngryManatee
Not all animals leave fossils since you have to have the proper setting for fossilization to occur. As I stated before, not all animals leave fossils behind, ESPECIALLY small ones.So, Homo sapiens neandertalensis? Is this the 5th or 6th time?
There are between 1-2 million species AngryManatee you mean to tell me that there are not many transitional fossils linking them to a common ancestor consdering the age of the earth?
Originally posted by AngryManatee
Not all animals leave fossils since you have to have the proper setting for fossilization to occur. As I stated before, not all animals leave fossils behind, ESPECIALLY small ones.So, Homo sapiens neandertalensis? Is this the 5th or 6th time?
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
http://www.answersingenesis.org/Docs/263.asp
And what disease (i may know which one it is they claim, but I just want you to say it so I can laugh and correct you) would that be that led to neadertal's apearence? Did this disease cause the differences in DNA compared to human?
Feel free to leave me something funny to wake up to tommorow.
Originally posted by AngryManatee
And what disease (i may know which one it is they claim, but I just want you to say it so I can laugh and correct you) would that be that led to neadertal's apearence? Did this disease cause the differences in DNA compared to human?Feel free to leave me something funny to wake up to tommorow.
Malnutritional diseases.