Originally posted by ragesRemorse
thats all aprt of chaos piru, and from what i understand, they seemed to think there was no looming threat, that the shooter had left the school grounds
same with are store manager. 2 days before christmas lastyear we had a bomb threat. i was off that day and my friends called me up and said yo man the store manager wants us to go in and see if theres a bomb in there. nobody went in.
Originally posted by PiruBlood
same with are store manager. 2 days before christmas lastyear we had a bomb threat. i was off that day and my friends called me up and said yo man the store manager wants us to go in and see if theres a bomb in there. nobody went in.
that dude needs to win manager of the year 😂
i mean really he really knows how to use his authority 😛
"black man says exterminate white people" but what happens when it's white conduits doing the killing of white people? think, back in the 1980s, black churches faced the nation and talked about rape music (ha ha, i know it's rap), crack, teen pregnancy, and the growing problem of black on black crime (esp. in the schools, school shooting was becoming an issue). blacks took the response of white society as a form of dismissal and racism, and felt that it was a "not in my backyard, so i don't care" issue. so i heard it with my own ears, blacks ill wishing everywhere, wishing that whites would have the same conflict with shootings. see, when blacks can't solve the problem, they will want you to inherent it, and ill wishing is just one part of it.
20 years later, they have their wish, i bet some are happy, misery loves company.
Originally posted by Lord Melkor
Of course, you know that criminals are usually better and more prepared to use guns than law-abiding citizens? And if criminal sees you have a gun, he is more likely to kill you. I don`t think I would be able to just shoot someone easily, but criminal would not hesitate.There are good reasons while European countries banned it.
Are those facts? Or did you just make them up...
I never said European countries didn't have good reasons.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
isnt there a thread about this? where most agree that comparing one situation with another, analogies and what not, is a poor debating tactic?
I don't know if there is. It was not a "debating tactic", I used it to prove the point that his point was pointless. If you followed his rants you would/should have seen that.
yahoo news has the title "he was a loner" as if that is a reason for his rampage, i haven't heard news as to why he did that yet, but i know plenty of loners, they aren't going around on shooting rampages. the fact that he was a loner keeps us from knowing what was on his mind...his character, that's a shame.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070417/ap_on_re_us/virginia_tech_shooting
so, what happens next is another theatre played out in public, the media will not release the picture, so we get to play a game of "who did it?" all of our racial or stereotypical notions pop out like daisies, and then, guess what? it wasn't the butler or the maid, it's the indian, the only race that hasn't had it's turn yet this month! yeah, that's my inductive reasoning right now, still eating crow for my assumption.
hmmm, how about something relevant and not retarded...
BLACKSBURG, Virginia (CNN) -- The gunman who killed 30 people at Virginia Tech's Norris Hall before turning the gun on himself was student Cho Seung-hui, university police Chief Wendell Flinchum said Tuesday.University officials said they were still trying to determine whether Cho was responsible for an earlier shooting at a dormitory that left two dead.
However, Flinchum said ballistics tests show that one of the two guns recovered at Norris Hall was used at Norris and at the dorm, both located on the 26,000-student campus. (Watch police disclose new information about the shooter )
Authorities are still investigating whether Cho had any accomplices in planning or executing Monday's rampage, Col. Steven Flaherty of the Virginia State Police said.
"It certainly is reasonable for us to assume that Cho was the shooter in both places, but we don't have the evidence to take us there at this particular point in time," Flaherty said.
Originally posted by Schecter
hmmm, how about something relevant and not retarded...
the only way he represents Asian people or S. Korea, is if he said he did or they said he did. otherwise, he represents himself. sorry, when it only happens every once in a while, it's a matter of their personality, if it happens too frequency and is encouraged, it's a culture. i know plenty of asian people, this isn't their culture, this is his way of dealing with an inner conflict and i wish he would have had friends or a note or something, and i wish he would have reached out to someone.
my god!
Originally posted by Schecter
you just need to shut up for a while. now that you realise you just owned yourself, que the "rare case" excuse. how predictable. really, havent you subjected us to enough of your topic killing page-filler posts? pages upon pages of your rambling. wtf?
don't read it, it's that's simple. or just don't reply, there are plenty of topics that i read and never write a reply...and plenty of topics i skip...so if you don't like my way of thinking, don't read it, esp. since it's so predictable.
Originally posted by Schecter
i dont read it. doesnt change the fact that you kill topics with your constant onslaught of racist horeshit. i dont take the bait, but everyone else does and the topic is killed.
i comment on a lot of topics that have nothing to do with race, sorry.
and u did read it, that's why you responded the way you did (by saying "i didn't read it"😉 😛