Originally posted by Ytse
Who said science has to prove god does or does not exist? I think most of us have said that it's not possible for science to do that.
It doesn't need to, see this is what always ticks me off, our side understands you want to believe in God, thats fine, keep it to yourselves. But your side keeps trying to push it on everyone.
Originally posted by Starhawk
It doesn't need to, see this is what always ticks me off, our side understands you want to believe in God, thats fine, keep it to yourselves. But your side keeps trying to push it on everyone.
You keep changing your position up on this thread. First saying that science doesn't have to disprove god because logic will, then you say it was a joke, then something about santa clause...
And you're the one constructing the sides here. As far as I'm concerned there are just people and their opinions and this is where we discuss them.
Originally posted by Ytse
You keep changing your position up on this thread. First saying that science doesn't have to disprove god because logic will, then you say it was a joke, then something about santa clause...And you're the one constructing the sides here. As far as I'm concerned there are just people and their opinions and this is where we discuss them.
Actually my message has been the same all the way threw.
What I meant, it was a joke because logic and science go hand and hand with each other. And Id by your reasoning I can claim Santa Claus is real as well.
Originally posted by Starhawk
What I meant, it was a joke because logic and science go hand and hand with each other.
But logic != science.
And Id by your reasoning I can claim Santa Claus is real as well.
No, my reasoning has nothing to do with whether or not someone can make a claim. You don't need reason at all to make claims.
------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
That is correct, how could science prove or disprove a fictional character from an old book. Science deals with facts, not fiction.
Saying it's "fictional" isn't very scientific at all.
Originally posted by Ytse
I think you need some classes in reading comprehension. I said that science cannot prove or disprove such claims. I never said that makes any such claim true.
No I think you need those classes.
Your side claims that God is real due to the fact that science cannot prove he isn't.
By that logic Santa is real since science also cannot prove he isn't real.
Originally posted by Starhawk
No I think you need those classes.Your side claims that God is real due to the fact that science cannot prove he isn't.
By that logic Santa is real since science also cannot prove he isn't real.
I have not made that claim. Ytse has not made that claim. Therefore, "our side" has not made that claim.
Originally posted by Starhawk
Your side claims that God is real due to the fact that science cannot prove he isn't.
My side? I never said I had a "side." And I never used that logic either. You seem to think I have for some reason.
Regardless, please cite where I said that. You can't because I didn't...but go ahead and try.