Science cannnot disprove the existence of God.

Originally posted by Ytse
But the standards of proof you're using are scientific standards. Yet at the same time you're saying it's not a matter for science. So which is it?

Where did I say that?

Originally posted by Starhawk
Where did I say that?

Originally posted by Starhawk
Science doesn't need to, it's kid brother LOGIC does the job for it.

Thats was a joke, Logic is part of science.

As I said, I have never told anyone they can't have faith that a god exists. But leave it as a matter of personal faith and nothing more.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Thats was a joke, Logic is part of science.

Logic is used in science but it's not exclusive to it by any means. So, lets go back to your claim about science being able to disprove god...

Originally posted by Starhawk
That which cannot be proven is not real.

Originally posted by Starhawk
That which cannot be proven is not real.

Neither is there any logic, IMO, in requiring empirical evidence for any transempirical entity, including "God."

So bascially you think Santa Claus is real? I mean prove he isn't? It's the same thing.

That which cannot be proven is not real.

YOU TROLL.

So bascially you think Santa Claus is real? I mean prove he isn't? It's the same thing.

Originally posted by Starhawk
YOU TROLL.

So bascially you think Santa Claus is real? I mean prove he isn't? It's the same thing.

However, to state that "that which cannot be proven is not real" is absolute horseshit.

Let's go back some number of years. "YOU CAN'T PROVE THAT ATOMS EXIST; THEREFORE THEY AREN'T REAL."

But we eventually did prove it through science.

Basically leave God's existence to a matter of personal faith, and don't expect logical scientific minds to believe.

Originally posted by Starhawk
But we eventually did prove it through science.

Basically leave God's existence to a matter of personal faith, and don't expect logical scientific minds to believe.

Man, you really are a psuedointellectual...you're so full of bullshit that it hurts.

Sure, we eventually did prove it, but not in that lifetime. I guess those "logical scientific minds" should have just ignored the idea of atoms and gone about their business elsewhere.

Yes but it's not the same thing as atoms are a tangible thing you can prove. God is an idea that you cannot.

"Atoms are not a tangible thing one can prove! They are imaginations of psuedoscientists. Now go back to doing something that matters."

Originally posted by FeceMan
"Atoms are not a tangible thing one can prove! They are imaginations of psuedoscientists."

Are you drunk? Yes they are a tangible thing that we can most certainty prove.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Are you drunk? Yes they are a tangible thing that we can most certainty prove.

No, but the difference is, they were looking for something tangible. God is not, it is an idea.

Originally posted by Starhawk
No, but the difference is, they were looking for something tangible. God is not, it is an idea.

Or something.

Do you even understand what I am trying to tell you?

Originally posted by Starhawk
Do you even understand what I am trying to tell you?