Originally posted by General Zink
"Is it necessary for survival? I think so. The more advanced you are, the less threatened you will feel. A simple caveman would cower in fear of a saber-toothed cat, while it would take much more to scare, say, me."
"That may be helpful but it is not necessary. That implies it is the reason that it is done, but that does not correlate; much advancment has no function for survival, and the victor in a clash of societies is not always the most technologically developed, and in any case, you are only using the word in its technological sense. No mattter how culturally or morally developed the caveman is, the wild animal is a equal threat."
As for Azrael, Lo Qi will ask the same question he did of Berserker earlier.
"Purely selfish value?"
And will follow that up with
"And your continual statement of subjectivty is not particularly useful. it is your opinion I am after so effectively stating it is your opinion changles little. You are not really giving the underlying answer. Why do you like things that way? What is the reasoning behind it? Subjective does not mean random. There is still a justification."
"Yes, purely selfish value, though I can't rationally justify why I like things in a certain way. I could probably point the finger at society, and the way I was brought up, but I'd rather not. My opinions and feelings on subjects are my own, and while it is possible and entirely fair to question their basis, there is simply no logically satisfactory answer I can give you for them."
"Zion is in a fight for survival and little else so it is not the best example. Societies look for survival first before all else, for reasons that I feel are obvious. When you talk of shared purpose, are you suggesting some higher meaning to it all?"
As for Azrael..
"So, you are saying that you desire things limke cultural and moral advancment, but cannot explain why? It just is so? If so... I feel you should consider these issues carefully. Understanding is difficult if you cannot understand yourself."
"Everything can be understood. To refuse to try and do that is a conscious decision, not an inevitable brick wall."
This is the Philosophy Path, after all. if you don't want to think and consider things, this isn't the place to be.
I need justification for opinions. "Because it is" won't do, and I believe lack of foundation was the downfall of some last time as well.