"And, again, what value do you find in that? I can merely ask the same question again, What is laudable about the accumulation of knowledge beyond the practical? Each time I can ask the same question until we reach whatever underlying reason you may have., What point- what purpose- any of these things?"
"Making a fully knowledgeable choice is much more difficult that it seems to many. Usually we make the choices others make for us, even if we think those are our own choices. But when we free each other from the condtioning we can make choices of our own and trully affect the world and us. Perhaps the diffrence between human and god?"
There are several major philosophies that state that morals are an expression of individual attitudes or emotion.
Eventually, any justification will come down to the statement "X is good becase Y"; in that scenario it's clear that "I desire it" as an interpretation of Y is as reasonable as "it increases our freedom". I'm not claiming any objective value at all, so there isn't any further justification possible - unless you want justification of a subjective approach in the first place.
I am thinking and considering things, but I see no other better answer your questions.
"Ah, help you- so practical value again. Do you find any value in it that is not practicval, but nonetheless desirable?"
To summarise the current situation-
Some things people do in order to survive- in modern day society, that basically comes down to finding a means of income.
But some things people do to improve themselves, regardless of whether it helps them survive or not. Many people strive to be 'better' people, but it;s not as if you get paid more for it. It is just something that you find laudable (i.e. praiseworthy) in any case, for a variery of reasons- often moral.
We're applying the same question to society. Societies have to survive. But societies also improve morally, culturally, and even some of their technological advancment is little to do with survival. Now, you may see society as the more important entity here, or you may say that this is simply a result of the cumulative effort of the individuals within it, or even that 'society' is a vague phrase and that this is simply a reflection of what people do. It doesn't matter, point is, we are asking a. if you find any value in societies advancing in ways that are not practically minded (i.e. geared for survival) and b. why.
It's the 'why' that is important; I very much doubt any of you truly think there is nothing good about the advance of society.