"What you say about purpose is nothing to do with authoritarianism. In terms of Government, the System is no more authoratative than Zion itself is. The fact that individuals within that system are only sitable for their created purpose is not a ,matter of rule, and Machines do not feel oppressed or constricted- at least, not for that particular reason.
"I feel Sirin and Klez are getting into more interesting areas. Those who spoke before may not have considered all the issues. Sirin... you refer to one end of the problem. There is a very important other side, which directly contradicts some ideas that have been advanced."
"The fact that development of society requires the shut down of many Machines is indeed interesting point, and it may be indeed more difficult for Machine society to change its goals, as Klez said, because if there is huge change of policies, don`t you need new Machines with modified purpose to deal with it, like it was the case with Sennacherib and his replacement"
"This is true but the alternative was worse.
"There are two problems with the original scenario some of you espoused- and with a certain amount of moral indignation too, I might add. The first problem is simply one that the evidence does not back your assertion. The second is that the lessons we have been through earlier are not taking hold.
"Let us look at the practical issue first. It has been... well. A long time. A three digit number since the Matrix was created. And Machine society consists of over a billion individuals. Think about how many advances can be made in that time- how many Human advances were made in the 20th century? Or the 19th, 20th, and 21st combined?"
I've been having a hectic week, so I'll try to get my opinions on this down now, sorry:
"I must agree with Sirin," says Azrael, "That the advancement of machine society relies entirely upon the willing co-operation of millions of entities in their own destruction makes it a somewhat shaky concept. If each and every machine relies on the Matrix for power, then surely the existence of these 'Exiles' results in a hefty drain of the resources Machine Society could otherwise be utilising to advance, especially if they are obselete and no longer contribute anything to society."
"These are valid concerns. So as I say, let us follow the process through step by step."
Incidentally, you are all feeling very unwell by this point.
"Centuries of time to advance, and billions of Machines. What would be the practical output, from the point of view of the Matrix, of this situation, in regards to the scenario of a society where the obsolete must give way to the new?"
"Well, I was thinking about the number of Machines required for society compared to the their dependance on Matrix for energy.
Returning to your question, wouldn`t it mean that Matrix should become obsolete at same point as well, as Machine Society is advanced enough to find more efficient solutions?
Another issue is the fact that the number of Exiles in Matrix should be ever growing."
"It depends. I am not sure how often Machines are replaced by newer models. Perhaps there exist Machines that were part of the Society from its beginning. But indeed wouldn`t such a large number obstruct the Matrix......."- Melkor is barely able to finish as he starts coughing.
"I think we should be looking for an end of this discussion. We are dying."- He speaks grimly, still thinking that it cannot end like this.
"Far too many. Think about the situation. Over a billion Machines, in a period of centuries. We know that most Machines will chose Exile rather than deletion- a few have an ethci nor dissimilar to the samurai, giving their lives to such a need, but like most sentient life forms the majority of Machines have an acute sense of their own value.
"We are talking hundreds of millions of Exiles would be in the Matrix by now. A situation impossible for two reasons."