Happy 4/20

Originally posted by Sorgo X
Oh, stop it. Your craptastic little diversion tactics are worth shit against me. Can you read, or do you have problems doing that on top of everything else?

Hypocricy is never a great start to a debate.

A) You spoke out against petty remakes.

B) "On top of everything else."? What would everything else have to do with anything here?

Originally posted by Sorgo X
Oh look, irrelevant (And petty) insults that have nothing to do with anything ALREADY.

Tsk tsk, boy.

Originally posted by Sorgo X
He is replying to me saying that it is UNKNOWN when 420 KICKED off.

Yes, unknown to him. Don't read between the lines, Soggy, read the actual ones.

Originally posted by Sorgo X
He's effectively stating 420 started in the early nineties. It's all he knows.

A) I didn't get that impression.

B) Considering it's your word against his, and he is telling you what HE means, wary or not, that's how it goes. He is the one who said it, he is telling you what it means. So to be so presumptuous as to say "He meant..." is ignorant, and did you not say ignorance is bad in another thread?

Originally posted by Sorgo X
SINCE that is all he knows, I clarified by showing him that 420 actually STARTED in the early SEVENTIES.

His initial statement, as he has said, didn't deny that. Nor does it suggest so in the first place. It's just poorly worded.

Originally posted by Sorgo X
He changed his argument to say NOBODY KNEW about it then. He then gave me a quote stating that PEOPLE KNEW ABOUT IT from the seventies until the late eighties.

Yes, it was badly worded. I once said "Nobody knew about Muse before Absolution." when the American fan-boom was occuring. My statement wasn't true, was it? There were fans before hand, it's called an exaggeration.

Originally posted by Sorgo X
Then he came, posted and edited his post trying to say he lacked elaboration to cover his ass. Why would he need to edit? Why not say that in the first place?

I have no proof that he edited besides your word. I'm not going to assume either way, but even without, you're still basing your entire argument on being a presumptuous fool.

Originally posted by Sorgo X
He wanted to save his own embarassment and move on without no one knowing he made a mistake.

I've called him out for terribly wording his point, so how can you claim nobody has noticed his mistakes?

Originally posted by Sorgo X
^ (The above is in Layman's terms just for you, AC! Consider it an early birthday present)

This coming from the man who said he didn't want petty remarks. We both know I don't need layman's terms, and that's a caveman-era tactic, Soggy. Make the other person seem stupid by needlessly simplifying the post, yes, it's an old one.

About as harmful to me as, oddly, weed is to...well...anyone.

Originally posted by Sorgo X
Too bad someone knew. Me:

But I don't, and I would need to in order to agree.

Originally posted by Sorgo X
Which following post? You quoted me. 😐

Oh, I'll say it in layman's terms on a lame man's terms (Funny how this works.);

The post...(Still there?)...that he posted...(Keep the pace.)...after his first one...(Almost.)...in regards to his clarification.

Originally posted by Sorgo X
^ That proves your lack of awareness.

He read what I said, and replied accordingly. I refuted it and he moved on to something else. I refuted it and he changed it a third time. Honestly, a twelve year old could see this blindfolded.

BIT of an exaggeration, a twelve year old could see it blindfolded? We couldn't see it blindfolded.

You made a big misinterpretation of his, to be fair, badly worded post. Then you got so caught up in proving him wrong, you failed to cool your jets and see what had happened. Now, you'll never admit to being wrong, you came too far.

Originally posted by Sorgo X
Read above, kiddo. It doesn't add up. At all.

To a retard 5 and 5 don't make 10, it doesn't mean they don't actually make 10.

Either way, this beef is yours and his. I've proven why you were wrong, or may have been wrong. You can have the last word, this is a blessing I give to an ever struggling Soggy.

*Anticipates: "YOU CAN'T REPLY!"*

-AC

you are a liar and an unfortunate little yapping emo razor-bait child. (which is sad since you're in your 20's it seems....wow dude)

:edit: jesus tapdancing christ AC why did you waste all that time?

🥷

Hypocricy is never a great start to a debate.

I'm guessing you speak from experience?

A) You spoke out against petty remakes.

What remake? Huh?

B) "On top of everything else."? What would everything else have to do with anything here?

What the f*ck? Where did I say that?

Tsk tsk, boy.

You must have a shoddy memory. We're the same age. Get with the program.

Yes, unknown to him. Don't read between the lines, Soggy, read the actual ones.

Take your own god damn advice and stop trying to twist things into distortion. I've explained that it will not work with with me.

His reply was to ME stating that it was UNKNOWN how 420 kicked off.

And yes, it is apparently unknown to him considering he said early nineties when it was early seventies.

A) I didn't get that impression.

I guess you're the dull knife in the tool shed, then.

And AGAIN:

Originally posted by Schecter
it started in the early 90's, thats all i know

B) Considering it's your word against his, and he is telling you what HE means, wary or not, that's how it goes. He is the one who said it, he is telling you what it means. So to be so presumptuous as to say "He meant..." is ignorant, and did you not say ignorance is bad in another thread?

No, it's not ignorant. It's apparent he was attempting to minimize losses with his edit and then him changing his point three times after I refuted them twice. You obviously lack awareness.

His initial statement, as he has said, didn't deny that. Nor does it suggest so in the first place. It's just poorly worded.

I never stated he denied that. Here, read again:

SINCE that is all he knows, I clarified by showing him that 420 actually STARTED in the early SEVENTIES.

Yes, it was badly worded. I once said "Nobody knew about Muse before Absolution." when the American fan-boom was occuring. My statement wasn't true, was it? There were fans before hand, it's called an exaggeration.

Prove it, AC. What you're saying is as just as plausible as what I'm saying.

I said it was unknown how 420 started and I listed some possibilities. He said 420 started in the early nineties. I refuted it.

He said no one never knew about 420 before the early nineties. I refuted it again.

He changed his stance again to cover losses and attempted to edit his post to make it look like he lacked elaboration. He was "playing stupid", so to say.

He was sloppy and didn't cover his tracks. Simple.

I have no proof that he edited besides your word. I'm not going to assume either way, but even without, you're still basing your entire argument on being a presumptuous fool.

No, not really. Our WHOLE debate is right in front of you. I showed you the post where he edited his post, AC.

Hahaha, you know what's funny? In *ALL* of his other posts, he shows when he has edited something.

It's funny how:

Originally posted by Schecter
:edit: i wanted to call you a tw@t but it came up as ****

Originally posted by Schecter

:edit: why are we doing this....this is so frustrating when someone wont accept such recent and personal history in plain text just a click away?

Originally posted by Schecter

:edit: here's a bit of info. i was going to weekend new york state campouts, phish shows, music festivals etc and nodody said shit about 420 until the early 90's (like 93-94). thats when it started to become mainstream. during this time you were about 9 years old likely. now stfu

Originally posted by Schecter

:edit: lol paper bag. who writes your gags?

Originally posted by Schecter

:edit: it was a code after all

But here:

was the first thing i said in this thread regarding 420. but you know that dont you, you little fluffy man?

was the first thing i said in this thread regarding 420.
my later words corrected it by implication. but you know
that dont you, you little fluffy man?

That's weird. He changed his post to make it look like he failed elaborating, but that was a lie.

He didn't even mention his edit like he did in the previous posts.

I hope I don't need to explain why he didn't mention the edit in that particular post, AC.

I've called him out for terribly wording his point, so how can you claim nobody has noticed his mistakes?

This coming from the man who said he didn't want petty remarks. We both know I don't need layman's terms, and that's a caveman-era tactic, Soggy. Make the other person seem stupid by needlessly simplifying the post, yes, it's an old one.

About as harmful to me as, oddly, weed is to...well...anyone.

Petty remarks? I was stating the obvious. I didn't think you'd pick up on it, but I had to systematically explain to you what was going on. Why?

Well, you proved I have to explain things to you in layman's terms because you still haven't hopped on the boat.

But I don't, and I would need to in order to agree.

I've showed you various times, and I'm disappointed you still haven't picked up on jack shit. Gravely disappointed.

Oh, I'll say it in layman's terms on a lame man's terms (Funny how this works.);

The post...(Still there?)...that he posted...(Keep the pace.)...after his first one...(Almost.)...in regards to his clarification.

WRONG!

I've gone over this already. Get with the times and read above.

BIT of an exaggeration, a twelve year old could see it blindfolded? We couldn't see it blindfolded.

Thanks for taking it literally. Wow, you really DO lack awareness, don't you?

You made a big misinterpretation of his, to be fair, badly worded post. Then you got so caught up in proving him wrong, you failed to cool your jets and see what had happened. Now, you'll never admit to being wrong, you came too far.

Wow, I'm actually getting tired of explaining this. I understood him fine the two times I proved him wrong. He changed his stance again to cover himself and f*cked up at the last moment of escaping from what was basically a smackdown.

To a retard 5 and 5 don't make 10, it doesn't mean they don't actually make 10.

Me confused. Me no understand. Me not get it. Me me.

Either way, this beef is yours and his. I've proven why you were wrong, or may have been wrong. You can have the last word, this is a blessing I give to an ever struggling Soggy.

*Anticipates: "YOU CAN'T REPLY!"

Everything you call proof was just put to rest.

Step your game up, Alpha Centauri.

Hi.

13

Originally posted by Mišt
Hi.

13

It's #1!

I will take that away from you. 😕

Originally posted by Solo
Light em up!

Welcome to 1997.

w00t!

wow is he still manipulating and cunting? emo sucks

"cunting"

well, happy 4/21 everyone *takes bonghit*

Loser

Originally posted by Secretus
Loser

zip it... before i make a skull bong out of ya

That hot ..I'm in loser

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
It's funny that there's being so much frivolous effort spent discussing...anything, in a thread about stoners.
-AC

Originally posted by Solo
No kidding.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Sorgo, maybe you're intentionally missing the point, or maybe you're just stupid...oh wait...that's both, but anyway;

So you throwing yourself around, pointing out that he was "wrong" solves nothing, because in fact, he wasn't even "wrong", he was implicitly referring to when the MAINSTREAM started, not the whole movement, as his later implied clarification confirms.

His original statement just wasn't clear, and you didn't think to ask what it meant.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Let's review this:

The part where he said "That's all I know."? That bit? Or the bit after you suggested an earlier birth, and he said he's not denying it, but the 90s is when it hit the mainstream? Which part of those two Sorgo-shaming parts are we discussing?

He didn't say the opposite either. He told you exactly what he believed, then issued a clarifying statement. You failed to ask.

Yeah, and I'm not saying his opening statement was the clearest, but he didn't believe what you claim he did, and his following post proves such.

That quote proves nothing but bad wording on his part, and resultant misinterpretation on yours.

He starts by saying he believes it could have existed before, so that proves you wrong. He then says nobody knew, which is clearly, in the context, a poorly worded version of "Nobody cared.". As in, the mainstream. It's like saying nobody knew about Muse before Absolution. They did, they had a massive following here, but "nobody" as in the mainstream.

I didn't even know about the edit and his story still adds up.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Hypocricy is never a great start to a debate.

A) You spoke out against petty remakes.

B) "On top of everything else."? What would everything else have to do with anything here?

Tsk tsk, boy.

Yes, unknown to him. Don't read between the lines, Soggy, read the actual ones.

A) I didn't get that impression.

B) Considering it's your word against his, and he is telling you what HE means, wary or not, that's how it goes. He is the one who said it, he is telling you what it means. So to be so presumptuous as to say "He meant..." is ignorant, and did you not say ignorance is bad in another thread?

His initial statement, as he has said, didn't deny that. Nor does it suggest so in the first place. It's just poorly worded.

Yes, it was badly worded. I once said "Nobody knew about Muse before Absolution." when the American fan-boom was occuring. My statement wasn't true, was it? There were fans before hand, it's called an exaggeration.

I have no proof that he edited besides your word. I'm not going to assume either way, but even without, you're still basing your entire argument on being a presumptuous fool.

I've called him out for terribly wording his point, so how can you claim nobody has noticed his mistakes?

This coming from the man who said he didn't want petty remarks. We both know I don't need layman's terms, and that's a caveman-era tactic, Soggy. Make the other person seem stupid by needlessly simplifying the post, yes, it's an old one.

About as harmful to me as, oddly, weed is to...well...anyone.

But I don't, and I would need to in order to agree.

Oh, I'll say it in layman's terms on a lame man's terms (Funny how this works.);

The post...(Still there?)...that he posted...(Keep the pace.)...after his first one...(Almost.)...in regards to his clarification.

BIT of an exaggeration, a twelve year old could see it blindfolded? We couldn't see it blindfolded.

You made a big misinterpretation of his, to be fair, badly worded post. Then you got so caught up in proving him wrong, you failed to cool your jets and see what had happened. Now, you'll never admit to being wrong, you came too far.

To a retard 5 and 5 don't make 10, it doesn't mean they don't actually make 10.

Either way, this beef is yours and his. I've proven why you were wrong, or may have been wrong. You can have the last word, this is a blessing I give to an ever struggling Soggy.

*Anticipates: "YOU CAN'T REPLY!"*

-AC

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Originally posted by Secretus
"cunting"

Originally posted by InnerRise
funny

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Yeah.

my 4/20 was actually quite uneventful, i played one game of beirut and my friend started puking after it.....lightweight

Originally posted by Ryan 88
my 4/20 was actually quite uneventful, i played one game of beirut and my friend started puking after it.....lightweight

Nasty as hell.