Mothers arrested for forcing there children to have a hardcore match!!!???

Started by Alpha Centauri21 pages
Originally posted by Starhawk
Then you could talk about how this could be prevented in the future, whether or not the mother's sentence was strict enough. You know, intellectual discussion?

Talking about preventing things like this happening is not intelligent discussion, intelligent discussion is accepting things like this will happen and not being foolish enough as to think we can stop it.

None of us can prevent it except by not doing it, that's why threads like this are dumb.

Someone posts a "bad" story, everyone goes "Yeah it's bad.", then what? What more could be possibly developed?

Anyone tries to do anything besides say "OOOH! TERRIBLE!" and you're throwing a fit.

-AC

Originally posted by Starhawk
Then you could talk about how this could be prevented in the future, whether or not the mother's sentence was strict enough. You know, intellectual discussion?

Do you really believe these mothers were concerned over legalities when they did this? Seriously now.

Also, child abuse is illegal, as noted above, these mothers were charged and will face sentencing. You fail.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Talking about preventing things like this happening is not intelligent discussion, intelligent discussion is accepting things like this will happen and not being foolish enough as to think we can stop it.

None of us can prevent it except by not doing it, that's why threads like this are dumb.

Someone posts a "bad" story, everyone goes "Yeah it's bad.", then what? What more could be possibly developed?

Anyone tries to do anything besides say "OOOH! TERRIBLE!" and you're throwing a fit.

-AC

No it's that the subject is being made into a joke.

Originally posted by Robtard
Do you really believe these mothers were concerned over legalities when they did this? Seriously now.

Also, child abuse is illegal, as noted above, these mothers were charged and will face sentencing. You fail.

Probably not getting a tough a sentence as they should though.

So the rationale is; "I find this to be a bad occurance, as do you, but I also deem it inappropriate to be approached with humour, so therefore it is."?

Some religious nut (As you called him.) said that lesbians were bad, you made light of it, and he could come right back and say "It's no laughing matter, my children were scarred".

-AC

Originally posted by Starhawk
Probably not getting a tough a sentence as they should though.

"All four women, from North Prospect, Plymouth, Devon, pleaded guilty to child cruelty and were given 12-month sentences suspended for two years.

They also were each ordered to carry out 100 hours of community service and banned from working with children ."

Hmmm... What do you think would be the proper punishment? Also, remember to be intellectually honest and only go off of what the story told us, don't add your only conclusion of "trauma", "be in therapy", "grow up to be monsters" etc. etc. etc.

The religious nut wasn't abusing his kids, other then teaching them how to be close-minded homophobes.

Originally posted by Starhawk
The religious nut wasn't abusing his kids, other then teaching them how to be close-minded homophobes.

teaching hate is a form of mental abuse... you fail [again]

Originally posted by Robtard
teaching hate is a form of mental abuse... you fail [again]

Not under the law it is. Under the law a parent has the right to pass down whatever mixed up beliefs they want as long as it doesn't lead the child to commit crimes.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Not under the law it is. Under the law a parent has the right to pass down whatever mixed up beliefs they want as long as it doesn't lead the child to commit crimes.

Oh really... Answer me this, if the law stipulated that making your toddlers smack each other is acceptable, you wouldn't have problem with it and be preaching?

Also, teaching hatred has the direct ability to make someone commit a hate crime. Do you think "gay bashers" were taught to respect homosexuals as people?

Originally posted by Robtard
Oh really... Answer me this, if the law stipulated that making your toddlers smack each other is acceptable, you wouldn't have problem with it and be preaching?

Also, teaching hatred has the direct ability to make someone commit a hate crime.

No I would still have a problem with it. And teaching hate may lead a child to commit a crime but that outcome is not guaranteed. Allot of children who are taught hate eventually grow out of it as they are exposed to the world and yes I agree that it should be outlawed, but then we are infringing on the freedom to pass on values to our kids and the flagwavers would get upset.

Originally posted by Starhawk
No I would still have a problem with it. And teaching hate may lead a child to commit a crime but that outcome is not guaranteed. Allot of children who are taught hate eventually grow out of it as they are exposed to the world and yes I agree that it should be outlawed, but then we are infringing on the freedom to pass on values to our kids and the flagwavers would get upset.

You fail [again] by your own hypocrisy then... You should feel the same towards both cases of child abuse then regardless of the law. Be it mental abuse, physical abuse or a combination of both.

Originally posted by Robtard
You fail [again] by your own hypocrisy then... You should feel the same towards both cases of child abuse then regardless of the law. Be it mental abuse, physical abuse or a combination of both.

Passing on values is not considered child abuse. Simply because we disagree with those values doesn't make it child abuse.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Passing on values is not considered child abuse. Simply because we disagree with those values doesn't make it child abuse.

Though correct, you fail [again] by your own previous knee-jerks and hypocrisy in this and the other thread.

You never answered by above question though 'proper punishment' though. Tickle my fancy and do so?

Originally posted by Robtard
Though correct, you fail [again] by your own previous knee-jerks and hypocrisy in this and the other thread.

You never answered by above question though 'proper punishment' though. Tickle my fancy and do so?

You through insults out without any validation behind them which makes them invalid.

One is child abuse, the other is not. And yes there is something funny about a hypocrite homophobic father having a morality fit when there was already porn in the house.

The idea of parents using their babies for cock fighting is not in anyway funny.

It's not that hard of a distinction.

Originally posted by Starhawk
parents using their babies for cock fighting

😂

Originally posted by Schecter
😂

Thank you for proving my point.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Thank you for proving my point.

what, that you're a hypocritical weeping nanny with sand in your vagina?

you're welcome.

now lets all have a group hug and a good cry

i love you starhawk hug

btw, is it ok if i laugh in the "humans having sex with animals" thread?

Originally posted by Schecter
what, that you're a hypocritical weeping nanny with sand in your vagina?

you're welcome.

now lets all have a group hug and a good cry

i love you starhawk hug

And your counter arguement was? Seriously, I think the OTF is the place for you.