Originally posted by Puzzle
It's called he's done with the pointless arguing since you can never open your eyes and see someone else's point of view. You're arguing over a word for ****s sake, just shut your trap and move on without baiting people.
You're a biased moron.
Here's why:
Originally posted by Strangelove
Like I've said before, inexistent and other words like it are not legitimate words.A word is added to a dictionary if it is used frequently enough or used somewhat regularly over a period of 5 years. How else would we get "words" like D'oh or muggle? They are technically words now, but would you argue that they are legitimate words?
Looks like I'm the one who started it.
Or ...
Originally posted by Sorgo X
Dude, you can't just scurry off now. You're in too deep. You said that you being intelligent IS A FACT. Do you not understand how brutally false that is, seeing as intelligence is so subjective? I'm sure your egotism totally blocks your rationality, of course.
There are ways to prove intelligence. Whether or not someone is of a specific intelligence is what's subjective.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
I've reviewed your knowledge on music, seen you post, believed that you did not use a search engine that time when I tested you and I believe you do contain a good knowledge with music. I don't have a problem with self-belief either. Hell, I encourage it.
Good.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
BUT, as the saying goes, "Everything in moderation".
I have to moderate my self-belief cos you dislike it? No, sorry. I said before, if you dislike it, don't read my posts. You said you wouldn't stop reading them, so then you have absolutely NO right to complain.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
Self-belief is good in moderation. You are not using it in moderation. You're saying that you are intelligent and that is a FACT. You're saying you stay relevant in a large percentage of your debates and that's FACT.
Let me decide what is good for me in moderation, ok? Good. Move on.
Second, it is a fact that in a large percent of my debates I am relevant. Who are you to even talk about my debates? For someone who's a self-proclaimed good debator, and doesn't really like me that much, you sure play the nosey chicken. Try getting involved in a debate sometime, huh?
Originally posted by Sorgo X
You need to stop dismissing that as fact. It's not.
It is. You have no say.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
Maybe if I repeat myself, you'll understand this time. What you've been doing is APPARENT. You do debate a lot but a large number of the time, you're always trying to say a specific debating pattern than someone is trying to perform without evidence. You did it on our first debate. You didn't know me and you tried telling me what I was doing. Same thing happened with the "Perpetually" debate. You couldn't find any evidence that I was using that word specifically to look smart.
I get it, you think that I don't get what you're saying because I disagree. What you need to accept is that you're wrong, and I'm right. We're discussing ME, ok? Why we're discussing me, I have absolutely no idea. For someone that so many people appear to not like, I'm certainly a worthy topic of discussion for you people, but we're discussing me nonetheless.
Second, don't give me that about I tried telling you. As soon as I explained myself, and proved you wrong on a few things, YOU explained, civilly, that you were not trying hard. I accepted that, because it was your word. You weren't getting snappy, you were just saying it. Why, then, do you decide it's appropriate to pin things on me as if they are fact, that I have neither said nor done? There is no reason.
I COULD find evidence that you were using it to look smart, it was obviously wrong though wasn't it? Evidence can point to things, it doesn't make it right.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
This scenario is NOT parallel (Repeating myself at this point) because I've seen you do this before. You know you've done it before. I'm not saying you're failing. You win an abundance of debates, but the ones you lose, your fall-back plan is the same and you cannot admit a loss.
You pay a hell of a lot of attention to me and my posts, for someone who dislikes my style so much.
The ones I lose? Show me. Quite literally show me. These have to be utterly definitive losses, by the way. Not just a debate where you THINK I'm losing.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
Here, show me an instance where you've lost a debate, AC. Why don't we review what the debate looks like?Let's step there, AC. You came in this thread, you tried to degrade me and I'm going to make you pay for it. Ride along with me, AC.
Hahahaha...you're serious? You say "The ones you lose...", and somehow the burden to provide these "losses" is on me? You've clearly observed them to the point of concluding I have a fall back plan, you've clearly spent so much time analysing me, YOU show me these losses. The burden of proof is on you.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
How am I making things up?Our first debate, regarding TFT, you kept on bouncing off with a stupid metaphorical front about "Basketball" and then you went on about how you were "stomping" me via PM and providing proof about how elitist and how much of a cult TFT was when you, in fact, had ZERO evidence.
It was in PM, so it will only ever be my word against yours here. However, you know I had evidence, I know I had evidence. EVERYTHING pointed to it being elitist, you denied it, so I just took your word. Wait...why aren't you over that? Christ.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
I'm TELLING you that you occasionally use insults and patronization to back off during losses in a debate. Why? I have proof. You've done it before.
Prove it then. Remember, these "losses" have to be definitive losses, not just areas where you believe I am losing.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
At your request, I can display posts of you, in fact, DOING this because I save my PM's. I don't want to embarrass you, so if you grant me permission, I will publicly display these PMs.
Wait, so hold on. You've never seen me do it publically, because you know I haven't, so what you are suggesting is that YOU INTERPRETED such things as me backing off? I patronised you? Sure, you deserved it. What? There's no argument from me. Go ahead and act like I'm the only guy to patronise anybody. I do it IN my debates sometimes, it doesn't mean they revolve around me patronising. Secondly, insults? The "debate" had degenerated to that point from us both.
Go ahead, post them, and I guarantee I have a factual explanation for each and every single example, which you will then deny.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
A) I never decided your mood. You went off about how I was trying to figure out moods through text, which I never display (Even vaguely).
You did tell me I needed to relax, indicating you believed I was in a mood other than relaxed, then went on to propose this as some fact.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
That's great, but stop pulling this vague crap. Be more elaborate. I'm not British. I don't know what the hell you're going on about.
Who on Earth do you think you are? I have to be public about my jokes, that I have between a friend and I, that other people on here understand, because YOU do not get it?
That's...a serious request? Are you kidding me?
Originally posted by Sorgo X
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/inexistent
http://www.yourdictionary.com/ahd/i/i0122500.html
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/inexistentIt was my opinion (Still is) that you need to relax because you had used several exclamation marks and even used a word that was inexistent. Not to mention you did not elaborate on your "British TV" joke.
So hold on, I do need to get this right.
I tell you I was fine, in no mood other than relaxed, and you ignore it...simply because you didn't get it, then have the nerve to suggest I need to elaborate? And who says the best comedy comes from Britain. I used a non-existent word, so therefore, it means I wasn't relaxed? I used exclamation marks...so that means I wasn't relaxed? Are you mental?
It means nothing of the sort. I told you that you read too much into it, accept this and move on. My word, over me, over yours.
-AC
Originally posted by Sorgo X
A) You didn't quite catch the analysis.
I did, but go on...
Originally posted by Sorgo X
B) No, anyone can say they're intelligent and label it as truth. A *RETARD* could do the same. I'm not trying to be an ass, but you're getting irritating. Intelligence is subjective, and self proclaimed intelligence is ridiculous. Do you know how many people think they're smart?
Anyone can do it and label it as truth, exactly. I'm not just labelling it as truth, it is. I'm not saying that as something that makes me anything I'm not, I just don't see what you hope to achieve by going around protesting the fact that I have a large general knowledge. I'm not saying "I am factually better than anyone.", I'm saying I have a large general knowledge. Why do you have a problem with that? Why do you even give a shit? Are you lonely?
I don't care if I'm irritating you, you said yourself (I browsed both posts) you won't stop reading nor replying, so you have no right to make anything resembling a complaint. My claims of being smart do not come out all over the place, it's happening now cos you're questioning it. I don't care how many people claim they are smart if they aren't, you claim you're a good debator, but you're not, to me, or to many people if your debates here are anything to go by. You get whooped every time, and YOU are the one who keeps posting as if it means you're still in the game.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
No, this is where you're wrong. You're not smarter than people. Everyone is smart and everyone is stupid. For example: Can you fix a car? Rewire an electrical device? Fix a computer? Solve a rubix cube? Direct a movie? Build a house?
Depending on the problems I can fix a car and a computer, I have had experience as an electrician, I have fixed people's computers, solving rubix cubes isn't that hard. Directing movies? Yes, but it might not be very good. Build a house? Given that it doesn't actually take brains to do it, just knowing how, then if I had training sure. Now let me ask you a question, ok? WHY on Earth is ANY of that an indication of general intelligence?
I know mechanics who can barely spell, I know electricians who are foul mouthed racists, I know a rather simple computer repair man, kids solve rubix cubes. Point being, none of those mean anything at all, and it proves you truly SUCK the huge one at aiming any kind of examples at me. I'm not "smarter" than people? What kind of a claim is that, you idiot? (Yes, you're being one.). Nobody is smarter than anyone? What's your point by saying that. You're saying there is nobody I am smarter than?
Originally posted by Sorgo X
Everyone is intelligent in their own way and everyone is stupid in their own way. The thing that's bothering me is you're saying that you're intelligent and it's FACT. You stay relevant in MOST of your debates and that's FACT.
First of all, that first line? No, just no. That's like saying "Men need to stop being attracted to twigs." if you're a 500lbs fat chick.
Those are facts, you are adding the rest. I.e: You think you're a god and better than everyone and etc. I never said that, nor is it implied, as I don't think it.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
You cannot say that you're intelligent for a FACT.
Conclusion: I can, I did. Suggestion: Deal.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
You have a lot to learn. This is why I cannot believe you when you say you're this intelligent person. You don't have much respect for others and you're arrogant. You have this attitude that you're superior to others and you prove that with your translucent patronization maneuvers during debates.
True intelligence is also not misunderstanding the philosophical quotes you use. YOU don't know "nothing", I don't know "nothing". Nobody is void of SOME kind of knowledge. The point of that quote is to say that in the grand scheme of things, humans know "nothing". Considering the natures of space, time and infinity. Not that we are all dumb and somehow smart.
I don't care if you believe me or not, Soggy. Do you think I'm in this to try and convince you or something? I don't care if you walk away with a worse view of me than coming into this. You're insignificant to me, you do not matter to me. I shouldn't matter to you, I'm just someone online, but apparently I was worth studying. Maybe you're just upset that I couldn't even give a rat's ass that you changed your name. You just want to be noticed, hence why you're green-eyed jealous of Ken's "seniority".
Originally posted by Sorgo X
You think I'm an idiot because I'm challenging you, messing with your terribly abundant pride and arrogance. You came in here and degraded me and I didn't call you stupid for it. Why?
Pardon? No no, I think you're an idiot because you act like one. Son, a lot smarter people than you have tried this old schtick and come up unsuccessful, don't delude yourself into believing you are somehow "the one" here. You're not messing with me, not by any stretch, you're laughable.
Degraded you? YOU told me in PM that you feel you should actually branch out and debate more, seeing as you feel you have competed in professional debates, or something similar. So then, when I make a general comment, which later gained relevance to you, about "Seraphim" being someone who thinks "he's" a good debator here, despite not having proven it, you flip your lid.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
I'm not a complete dolt, that's why. You, on the other hand, seem to like to pull off such things. Or try to, at least.
Nah, you are a bit of a complete dolt. Sorry.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
Don't you remember, AC? I'm stupid. Why would you waste time debating someone who is stupid. Wouldn't that be, ironically, a stupid thing to do?
Wouldn't you have skipped the part in my post where I said an admitted flaw is giving idiots too much of my time?
Originally posted by Sorgo X
Don't worry, we'll debate something with a point, but not yet.Not yet.
We won't ever, will we? Cos you're chicken. Never mind, I'll give you more time to study me, then it'll make it all the funnier when I send you back here (How's that for arrogance? Oops, it's not, just truth.).
Now for my next trick, your next post.
-AC
Originally posted by Sorgo X
It's a metaphor. It means you're not getting it, because ... You're not getting it.
I do get it, did you consider that you're shit at debating? No? Well, you are. It was a flawed metaphor that I used against you.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
Knowledge is knowledge. Period. Hell, Star Wars can effectively be considered a world issue. You probably know over a hundred people who's lives have been influenced by that movie. I consider every subject important and I don't have prejudice for certain subjects. Why?
"Star Wars can effectively me considered a world issue.". That's one I WILL, GUARANTEED, use against you in any instance in which you claim credibility or intelligence. I don't care what you say.
That does not make it a world issue.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
I'm not prejudice. Prejudice holds no room for reason.
We'll see if you're not prejudice...
Originally posted by Sorgo X
Wow, I wish this was actually a world where what you say can be dismissed as evidence just because you say it is.Damn, wouldn't it be nice?
So now it's got to the point where there's no NEED to reply to me, no fascination, nothing, yet...you dislike how I am and won't ignore my posts, even if they're not aimed at you? Speaking of how you said prejudice has no room for reason, I'd say your mind has no room for anything except rental space.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
I don't really need to put time into insulting techniques. It's improvised. I concentrate on discussion rather than debating.
de·bate
1. a discussion, as of a public question in an assembly, involving opposing viewpoints: a debate in the Senate on farm price supports.
Debating/discussing.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
Why can't that be considered a personal insult? You know, someone who believes in them-self might take that very seriously.
Yeah, they'd take it seriously if they find it the slightest bit true. You, as of yet, have not garnered any respect. You believe in yourself, and that is quite literally all you do have, because nobody here believes you're anything but a whiney baby. I have my share of haters, but most of them respect me too.
I'm not driven my praise or slowed by critique.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
Read my previous post. I'm still awaiting your permission to post PROOF you've done this.
Do it, and as I said, I can guarantee I'll have an explanation and you will deny it. I have those PMs too, so if you've edited them in any way, I will know.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
No, you're doing it right now! As we speak!You patronize your opponents and attempt to degrade them when your precious pride is being questioned or your hardened arrogance is being exposed.
Huh? You aren't having an effect on me...this is making sense now. YOU think that whenever I make a patronising remark toward you, it's as a result of you someone getting one over on me. No wonder you feel as though you do good in debates against me. I patronise you because you deserve it, my pride and "arrogance" are in tip top condition. My sides aren't, you do a real number on those.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
And no, I don't act as if everyone who debates you crushes you and I explained the EXACT OPPOSITE of that.You're already getting back to your insulting ways, hell, you never left. Look at your first post in this thread.
You were insulted, I didn't intend it as an insult.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
No man, stop covering your ass. You've CLEARLY done it before.
Proof.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
Doesn't matter. It does not change that you're an ego monster. Self proclaimed intelligence, the works.
You can view me as whatever you wish, just accept that this is how YOU view me, not necessarily what actually is.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
Most of the time, you waltz into a thread and make some joke about me or insult me.
Oh...oh...now who's the ego maniac. Prove this, or stop claiming it. I don't care about you enough to do that, dude.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
I've held my tongue long enough with the crap you pull off. So, I guess not anymore.
Believe I'm sca...hahahahaha, nah, this is funny.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
Right, AC? Right?
Left, Soggy, left. As in, all that's left is a soggy debate in your favour.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
Yes, it is extremely tragic. Even in this thread, you said you losing is "laughable" and you've proclaimed how intelligent you are and how you're most of the time being relevant during a debate. You're dismissing this as "Other people" saying it? This is not my opinion, this instance. You said it moments ago! In this thread! It's all right here, I'm just shining a light on it.
What are you trying to prove? You keep going on about losses, but it turns out the only examples you have will be PMs. PMs that'll either be edited or interpreted by you to depict a loss. You probably thought I'd be scared to let you post them, I'm not. I know I'll be able to laugh and counter.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
No, you're dismissing it as such. You think being in denial exempts you from this? Hahaha!It's clear what you do. It's not about what's up. You can say what you want about yourself. Hell, watch!
"I'm 200 LBS of athletic body. I'm the King of Germany. I have an eighteen inch dick. No one else can tell me what I think. What I am saying is fact."
^ That's what you sound like. No one can question the almighty AC. That's all it is, brother.
That is how you are interpreting my posts? Now I'm honestly seeing some kind of fatal attraction shit going on. That really isn't healthy, if you are imagining me saying that.
I never put across that kind of vibe nor will I imply it. YOU imagine it, YOU accept responsibility. If that's how you perceive me? FINE, but accept, as I said, that YOU are doing it. I don't believe that of myself, FACT.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
"If someone proves me wrong, I admit it. It rarely ever happens."Read what you said there. Read it a hundred times over. Maybe you'll understand my point soon enough if you do.
It rarely does, what's your point? Unlike you, I don't go into debates not knowing my shit.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
Did I say I didn't like you? How am I unable to control my emotions?
"I'm being forced to go through walls of semantics bullshit.", no you're not.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
Who's saying stupid shit now? Oh look, you're trying to figure me out again, thinking I can't control my emotions, making assumptions
Going by what you tell me.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
You're proving what I've been saying all this time. Is it so difficult for you to comprehend? Look! Right there! In that post of yours! See?Right, AC? Right?
No, you're probably seeing me boasting about a penis again. That still does bother me, by the way.
Originally posted by Sorgo X
I don't think so, son.
Then you have no right to complain.
-AC
Originally posted by Puzzle
It doesn't ****ing matter who started it! You're the one trying to keep it going and that is why you are now at fault.
No, not quite. Why should I just let it go? I'm not a dumb ass who runs away from everything like a cowardly son of a b*tch. He's telling me a word in the ENGLISH LANGUAGE is not a legitimate word. Am I not entitled to express my opinion? Who the F*CK are you to tell me what to do?
People debate to resolve a disagreement of opinion. If you can't comprehend this, then GGGGGGGGTTTTTFFFFFFOOOOO!
Originally posted by Sorgo X
No, not quite. Why should I just let it go? I'm not a dumb ass who runs away from everything like a cowardly son of a b*tch. He's telling me a word in the ENGLISH LANGUAGE is not a legitimate word. Am I not entitled to express my opinion? Who the F*CK are you to tell me what to do?People debate to resolve a disagreement of opinion. If you can't comprehend this, then GGGGGGGGTTTTTFFFFFFOOOOO!
Because he is correct and those words are not proper English. 🙂 Now I think someone needs to take a chill pill. 😊
Originally posted by PuzzlePROPER ENGLISH!
Because he is correct and those words are not proper English. 🙂 Now I think someone needs to take a chill pill. 😊
Thanks Ken, now I know what to call it 😊
And Sorgo, how am I running from an argument like a cowardly little *****? Unlike AC, I am unwilling to entertain your laughable debating "skills." And like I said, arguments with you are predisposed to go nowhere, so I'd rather just cut out the middle man. You believe what you believe, I believe what I believe. I just happen to be right.