Just a question. How important is experience? We often see comic characters take out guys who've been fighting for thousands of years or something and beating them. Is all of that CIS/PIS or something? Is it because they're not main characters they're just never as good? Or do people pretty much reach a max in skill and more experience doesn't help too much. (which i think should be most likely) Just wanted to know what people thought about this.
Originally posted by bobbiI think it's more like natural talent my beat experience like Karate Kid he's a natural talent even with Blades decades of experience karate Kid's talent out shines Blade.
Just a question. How important is experience? We often see comic characters take out guys who've been fighting for thousands of years or something and beating them. Is all of that CIS/PIS or something? Is it because they're not main characters they're just never as good? Or do people pretty much reach a max in skill and more experience doesn't help too much. (which i think should be most likely) Just wanted to know what people thought about this.
Originally posted by Peek
Thats some bad logic right there.
Batman's superpower: I really want to win, am very smart and can do tons and tons of pushups. Therefore I win. Thats what most of his writers go by anyway...
Think about it, the man is in the top 3 of the Justice League.
I'm goin for bats cuz a)I'm a huge fanboy and b) he regularly battles people way older than him (Ras Al Ghul) way stronger than him (about half his villains) etc...
Blade is stronger, faster, etc... but Bats has been around the block, and comes prepared every single time. Im givin him 7/10 because he also loses a lot, them comes back to win round 2.
Originally posted by bobbiOff of the top of my head Lady Shiva comes to mind but her daughter did end up beating her. Good question i feel like making pancakes i will get back to you later.
when has experience ever beaten natural talent in comics? besides when the heroes were just starting out kinda thing.
Originally posted by snoopdoggThat's all good......except for the fact that experience means almost jack **** in comics.
Blade has way more experience than Batmans does. Blade has been fighting vampires since he was 9. And he's 80 years old right now.
Take Karate Kid for example, he's potrayed as the best martial artist in all of comic history an he's only a teenager.
Or Ra's Al Ghul supposed to be a thousand years old but gets beaten by Batman at Ghul's own game: swordfighting.
Originally posted by Lord-of-Dreams
Batman's superpower: I really want to win, am very smart and can do tons and tons of pushups. Therefore I win. Thats what most of his writers go by anyway...
Think about it, the man is in the top 3 of the Justice League.
I'm goin for bats cuz a)I'm a huge fanboy and b) he regularly battles people way older than him (Ras Al Ghul) way stronger than him (about half his villains) etc...
Blade is stronger, faster, etc... but Bats has been around the block, and comes prepared every single time. Im givin him 7/10 because he also loses a lot, them comes back to win round 2.
same wit hblade he's taken out people stronger and faster than him (dracula) and he isnt stupid either, and not to mention blade is basically stronger, faster, just as experienced, packs more deadly equipment ,and has a healing factor
other than "he's batman and he always wins" I dont see how batman wins
oh are we using the blade with a gunhand or before that