Canada disgraces itself on the enviroment.

Started by Nellinator39 pages

Have you not heard about the tax incentive to use public transportation? Or the refitting of diesel school buses? Go wikipedia it. Also, I can't find any indication that Harper's poll numbers have dropped...

Nation is so commonly used to refer to entire continents/sub-continents everyone should have realised that it wasn't a mistake on his part that he couldn't change after the 15 minute edit period and he meant to post it. I do it all the time. I get my drugs from the nation of South America. The nation of the Middle East is really ****ed up right now. And so on.

Effect is the noun.
Affect is the verb.

doped

Originally posted by xmarksthespot

Effect is the noun.
Affect is the verb.

doped

Sometimes, anyway.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Sometimes, anyway.
Except in neuropsychology and when one means to say to bring about, in which case affect would be a noun and effect would be a verb respectively. You despotic scarfaced megalomaniac tinman.

Hahaha, cos my name and that.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Except in neuropsychology and when one means to say to bring about, in which case affect would be a noun and effect would be a verb respectively. You despotic scarfaced megalomaniac tinman.

I like your lecture, it effects me deeply. I hope it has the same affect on other listeners, continue.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I like your lecture, it effects me deeply. I hope it has the same affect on other listeners, continue.
Why you little... no soup for you.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Why you little... no soup for you.

SOUP NAZI!!!

Originally posted by Nellinator
Have you not heard about the tax incentive to use public transportation? Or the refitting of diesel school buses? Go wikipedia it. Also, I can't find any indication that Harper's poll numbers have dropped...

The problem is thats very small things, when it comes to the environment we need to start looking at big solutions and smaller deadlines.

And have you been following the news? His numbers have gone down so far that the news have started asking the parties if they are going to take advantage and call an election.

And you never commented on your parties brilliant idea of those lightbulbs which cannot be thrown out due to the magnesium in them.

Originally posted by Starhawk
The problem is thats very small things, when it comes to the environment we need to start looking at big solutions and smaller deadlines.

And have you been following the news? His numbers have gone down so far that the news have started asking the parties if they are going to take advantage and call an election.

And you never commented on your parties brilliant idea of those lightbulbs which cannot be thrown out due to the magnesium in them.

It's more than the Liberals did. And they are making a better plan, one that isn't counterproductive.

I find that surprising considering his popularity in the West hasn't dropped in the least. What's going to happen if there is an election and a new government? Reimplement Kyoto? It won't work because the West doesn't care. It would make it impossible.

It's not my party. But besides that, you only saw one side of the story. It is entirely feasible for them to create a lightbulb recycling program. Fluorescent lightbulbs have been in use for years and it really hasn't been a problem before.

The new lightbulbs they want people to use can't be recycled.

The problem is they are trying to do small things in areas that won't help. And elections have been won without the west before.

What's going to happen if there is an election and a new government? Reimplement Kyoto? It won't work because the West doesn't care. It would make it impossible.

You still need to address this. A new government will more than likely be worse.

I did, we can win without the west, and you have no way of knowing that a new government would be worse.

No you didn't. This isn't about the election. This is about Kyoto. It won't matter who is in government, Kyoto cannot be reimplemented because of the West. It won't work.

The west cannot say no to the federal government. If they did the federal government can fine them. And on an individual basis arrest them.

Got tyranny?

It's not tyranny, its the federal government. The ruling body of the country gets to say what goes.

Originally posted by Starhawk
The west cannot say no to the federal government. If they did the federal government can fine them. And on an individual basis arrest them.
Once again, no they won't. Alberta's economy and tax money is so vital to the stability of the country that pissing it off would be very counterproductive. Alberta seperation is a large movement. They don't want to seperate yet, but a large portion of Albertans would be more than willing to seperate if the government tried to fine us. It's actually a laughable idea. Alberta has said no before. Kyoto is an example of it happening. The Liberals did nothing, the Conservatives have done nothing and it is simply because they can't.

Yes they can, and if they haven't its only because you haven't pushed them far enough. And just because Alberta might want to separate doesn't mean it would happen. During the last Quebec referendum, Canada had arrangements with the US in case we needed extra troops to keep the peace in Quebec. What I mean is the government doesn't have to LET you separate.

Got tyranny?