The Thought Police (new hate crimes law)...

Originally posted by Starhawk
At least I can read what someone says and understand it without asking the same question repeatedly.

Provide the evidence and the questions will only then concern the actual evidence, and not where in the bloody hell it is.
Also, being a law student I would have thought you'd see the importance in the use of language; especially when criticising someone else's.

Isn't criticizing with a z? Yes, it is.

Originally posted by Strangelove
The FBI is the investigative arm of the Department of Justice. They have the exact same data.

And I could care less if you think I'm bashing or what, but you are absolutely bonkers if you think that you have a leg to stand on in this issue. You have been proved wrong at every turn, and yet you continue to spout the same (incorrect) opinions. And when you have nothing to say, you try and redirect the issue to "scold" us for bashing. It's not going to work, buddy.

The FBI do not investigate every type of crime in the US. The US department of justice may have better statistics then the FBI and I will provide the scans, sorry if I have real life things to do. I don't live off of KMC.

Originally posted by Starhawk
The FBI do not investigate every type of crime in the US. The US department of justice may have better statistics then the FBI and I will provide the scans, sorry if I have real life things to do. I don't live off of KMC.

Umm...doesn't the FBI gather information from all branches of government for their crime statistics?

Originally posted by Starhawk
The FBI do not investigate every type of crime in the US. The US department of justice may have better statistics then the FBI and I will provide the scans, sorry if I have real life things to do. I don't live off of KMC.

And the scans that you supposedly have would not take forever to upload. You're just stalling because you don't have shit.

Originally posted by RocasAtoll
Isn't criticizing with a z? Yes, it is.

The U.S spelling of it is, yes.

Hm. I concede.

Originally posted by Strangelove
Your claim runs right in the face of the affirmations of the Bureau's own website, the links to which Fishy has posted several times. Are you claiming that you know more than the FBI? I think that would be a foolish claim to make.

And the scans that you supposedly have would not take forever to upload. You're just stalling because you don't have shit.

No, I have to go to the library and get them scanned, they are reference material, you can't take them out of the library. As I said I have a life outside of KMC and I will get to it. You can choose to act like a big boy and be patient.

Originally posted by Starhawk
No, I have to go to the library and get them scanned, they are reference material, you can't take them out of the library. As I said I have a life outside of KMC and I will get to it. You can choose to act like a big boy and be patient.

Everything found at the library is found online...get to searching. 🙂

Originally posted by Starhawk
No, I have to go to the library and get them scanned, they are reference material, you can't take them out of the library. As I said I have a life outside of KMC and I will get to it. You can choose to act like a big boy and be patient.

Where did you get that nonsense? Many things in a library, especially a university one cannot be found online.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Where did you get that nonsense? Many things in a library, especially a university one cannot be found online.

Name one actual nugget of information you can find in a library (with proof) that I cannot find on the internet.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Where did you get that nonsense? Many things in a library, especially a university one cannot be found online.

I've got a suggestion Starhawk, why don't you bugger off for a bit until you get this illusive evidence? Then, you won't have to keep telling us to be patient. You could have an argument in an empty room, commendable I'm sure for a law student to hear. It's just a shame you'd still lose the argument.

Originally posted by Strangelove
Well your data is irrelevant anyhow....because you're wrong.

Not to mention that it is irrelevant to the topic of this thread.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Where did you get that nonsense? Many things in a library, especially a university one cannot be found online.

If you count librarians, then yes. Otherwise, no.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
I've got a suggestion Starhawk, why don't you bugger off for a bit until you get this illusive evidence? Then, you won't have to keep telling us to be patient. You could have an argument in an empty room, commendable I'm sure for a law student to hear. It's just a shame you'd still lose the argument.

Because you guys still make posts like this one that require my reply.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Because you guys still make posts like this one that require my reply.

That didn't require a reply. He told you to go get your information, we can sit and wait for you to come back.

Originally posted by Tattoo
That didn't require a reply. He told you to go get your information, we can sit and wait for you to come back.

While you guys continue your bash fest on me, I don't think so. Also it would be closed by now I'll have to go tomorrow.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Because you guys still make posts like this one that require my reply.

That's your reply? Let's face it that was a waste of both mine and your time. The reason people are still posting here is because of your flagrant self righteousness, if you're going to provide evidence provide it. No one wants to read you talk about something you cannot prove.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
That's your reply? Let's face it that was a waste of both mine and your time. The reason people are still posting here is because of your flagrant self righteousness, if you're going to provide evidence provide it. No one wants to read you talk about something you cannot prove.

No people want a fight and cannot muster the patience a 5 year old possesses.