Originally posted by UniOmniBut, at the same time, you think Gladiator can beat Black Adam?
I'll say either Thor or Adam.Two people here deal out magic, which Superman doesn't shrug off on average.
It might not be what it was PC, but it's still a viable path to victory.And since two people here have fought Superman, and taken his measure, they're likely to concentrate their initial attacks on him, taking him out fast.
Majestic is my boy, and more ruthless, but might be outclassed in either firepower, or durability.
It'll come down to Teth and Thor, and barring some plot devicey lightning strike ala Omacs attack, i'd put money on the Shazamer.
Originally posted by WorldWarHulk
But, at the same time, you think Gladiator can beat Black Adam?
🤨
Yuppers.
Teth and Billy have a great record against Magic, which is Thors main thing.
That gives him the edge against Thor imo.
And Gladiator is less likely to fool around against Teth, so he's got the edge in speed, a peer in power and durability and good energy output and despite forumlore, he doesn't lose power when he faces someone on or above his level.
He merely rises to the occasion.
Originally posted by UniOmniBut... but, you just basically gave Teth the majority against Majestic, who is rightfully>>>Gladiator...
Yuppers.Teth and Billy have a great record against Magic, which is Thors main thing.
That gives him the edge against Thor imo.
And Gladiator is less likely to fool around against Teth, so he's got the edge in speed, a peer in power and durability and good energy output and despite forumlore, he doesn't lose power when he faces someone on or above his level.
He merely rises to the occasion.
Also, your reason for him beating BA is redicules.
OMSg he rizes 2 teh occasion!!?!
What makes you think, he will be standing over BA? What feats does he have, for taking out anyone even near BA's level of duribility?
Also, I know what he can do, I don't follow "forumlore" or a company bias.
I am going to naturally assume you read all of World War 3...
What is Glad's ill flaunted speed advantage going to do?
I believe Jay tried to blitz him, and got KO'ed.
Even though Gladiator hardly if ever blitzes (unless we are talking about Thor, and one or two examples is hardly enough for a viable attack), Black Adam has the reflexes to catch him right in the chin.
Meh, nevermind, Sentry and Glads are both Marvel's equivalents of Superman, which equates into Marvel fans, a virtual god.
Which, would make them higher than Superman (because for some reason, people don't like Superman, but they like his other company clones), so, all I'm getting to, is that there is no way for me to prove Gladiator<<<Superman, so, basically, this discussion is pointless, isn't it?
Or, before I make assumptions, do you think Gladiator>Superman?
Originally posted by WorldWarHulk
But... but, you just basically gave Teth the majority against Majestic, who is rightfully>>>Gladiator...
🤨Also, your reason for him beating BA is redicules.
OMSg he rizes 2 teh occasion!!?!What makes you think, he will be standing over BA? What feats does he have, for taking out anyone even near BA's level of duribility?
Also, I know what he can do, I don't follow "forumlore" or a company bias.I am going to naturally assume you read all of World War 3...
What is Glad's ill flaunted speed advantage going to do?
I believe Jay tried to blitz him, and got KO'ed.Even though Gladiator hardly if ever blitzes (unless we are talking about Thor, and one or two examples is hardly enough for a viable attack), Black Adam has the reflexes to catch him right in the chin.
Meh, nevermind, Sentry and Glads are both Marvel's equivalents of Superman, which equates into Marvel fans, a virtual god.
Which, would make them higher than Superman (because for some reason, people don't like Superman, but they like his other company clones), so, all I'm getting to, is that there is no way for me to prove Gladiator<<<Superman, so, basically, this discussion is pointless, isn't it?
Or, before I make assumptions, do you think Gladiator>Superman?
Thing is, i don't consider Majestic to be > Gladiator overall.
Certainly a better character, but not a level above as you imply.
Majestic is likely stronger, and much smarter.
Gladiator i'd wager is a bit more durable, faster, and they're about tied for energy output.
Both are willing to kill to see their objectives through, tho Gladiator is much sooner to go fatalistic.
And i put Black Adam around, or above Glads for durability, but i do think his firepower would even the score as i'd say in a Superman vs Shazam thread.
And i don't really deal in speedblitzes, since aside from Flashtype speedsters, they're not consistently used in comics.
Gladiator has a speed feat, as does Teth where he fights Jay at superspeeds in JSA.
Thats not the reason why i think Gladiator wins.
And lol at you calling me a biased Marvelfanboy for thinking a peer can take a win.
Fact - I don't like Sentry. I hate his existence with every fiber of being that's within me, since i feel he's something Marvel doesn't need. Just because i dislike him, and feels he adds nothing, doesn't mean that i don't see how Marvel intends him to be shown.
And the fact that he doesn't have a low showing yet doesn't hurt his case.
Fact 2 - I don't think Sentry or Gladiator would beat Superman in a fight, since he's Superman and is the premiere.
Sentry could have a feat list that spans 80 years, and they could all trump Supermans, and he'd still lose.
I see Teth and Kallark as virtual equals, with Gladiator having a useful firepower attack, and Teth while having his charged fist attack, is at a disadvantage, since Gladiator isn't notably vulnerable to magical attacks.
And i find it funny that the middle of your post turned into a rant that would make TricksterPriest proud, when you yourself said that to feel one character can beat another doesn't automatically mean that person feels an entire company is inferior.
Funny, that.