The Mark of the Beast (666)

Started by Shakyamunison34 pages

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Yes everything in the Bible is truly stated, but not necessarily a statement of Truth. For example, let's say that I told you to record everything that I say so that it could be preserved for future posterity or study 100 years from now. Here is what you record me as saying,

"All elephants have wings and can fly, all sharks live on dry land, all zebras live underground, and all birds fly to the moon lay the eggs and then fly back to earth."

Question: in this scenario [B]did I actually say those words? Yes? You are correct. But is everything that I said a statement of truth (i.e. truthful or factual)? No? You are correct again.

So what we have are words that I have truly stated (because you wrote down every word that I said), but my words are not statements of truth (that's because elephants do not have wings and they cannot fly, all sharks do not live on dry land, all zebras do not live underground, and all birds do not fly to the moon, lay their eggs and then fly back to earth).

All Scripture in the Bible is truly stated but not necessarily fact or truth. The Bible simply records the actual words that were spoken, or the events that occurred. But you have to rightly divide the Word of Truth to determine if what the Bible reveals is both truly stated and a statement of Truth. For example, the Bible states that Jesus Christ died for our sins, was buried, and rose again the third day. This statement is truly stated (meaning Paul did say these words about Jesus), and Paul's words are statements of truth (or truthful) because Jesus did actually die, was literally buried, and did in fact rise from the dead the third day. [/B]

How do you know that you interpretation is better then someone else? There are as many interpretations of the bible as there are sands on the beaches of the world.

Everyone thinks their interpretation is the correct one, that's the problem.

Originally posted by debbiejo
Everyone thinks their interpretation is the correct one, that's the problem.

Everyone loves their own ideas, but that's just my idea, and I love it. 😂

They should call it Mark of the Beast XXX

The Beast is a religious system......Hmmmmm

Originally posted by Goddess Kali
They should call it [b]Mark of the Beast XXX [/B]

I'd buy that for a dollar.

I'm pretty sure someone's said this already but the Mark of the Beast is 616, 1!!!!!! not 666, it was a misprint. but yeah the general populace does't care so yeah...whatever...

I'll never be your beast of burden
My back is broad, but it's a hurting
All I want is for you to make love to me
I'll never be your beast of burden
I've walked for miles, my feet are hurting
All I want is for you to make love to me

😎

Re: Re: The Mark of the Beast (666)

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Do you have a Social Security Number? If yes, then you already have the mark of the beast.

Do you have a debit card or credit card, then you already have the mark of the beast.

Conspiracy threads make me laugh. 😆

conspiracy theories actually have more creedence than your post this time

Re: Re: Re: The Mark of the Beast (666)

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
conspiracy theories actually have more creedence than your post this time

No, I'm sorry, but you don't know what I was talking about. Many people want to feel special. Therefore, they make something out of nothing. Just like conspiracy theories, that by their very nature are untrue, the bibles mark of the beast is also untrue.

The mark of the beast is probably Nero and his men against the christians at that time. Code language.

Originally posted by debbiejo
The mark of the beast is probably Nero and his men against the christians at that time. Code language.

Revelations should have never been put in the bible. What a mistake.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Revelations should have never been put in the bible. What a mistake.

yeah roffle 😉 😉 😉

Originally posted by FeceMan
yeah roffle 😉 😉 😉

It was a big debate at the time, and Revelations was almost left out.

Satan's # is 616

My # is 69 69

OK, if Revelations was NOT included in the cannon of scripture, how would it of changed our view of Jesus return.

Originally posted by {{QS}}
The mark of the beast is 616.Just thought you'd like to know.

ku ku ku

The events stated in the book of Revelations is a reality yet to come, and it is as truthful as every other part of the bible.

God can change the minds of men, but what then, would be the purpose of free will?

Glory be to God, His Son and His people.
Amen.

Originally posted by Up In Flames
God can change the minds of men, but what then, would be the purpose of free will?

God routinely interferes with the free will of people in The Bible.

now when you say HIS people, who do you mean exactly? you? thr christians having the same specific beliefs as you?

whay about all the wrest of the people, {the vast majority}, why do you limit glory to GOD'S people?