Want to here a Joke? It's funny

Originally posted by Captain Maynard
Not to mention the fact that its suppose to be funny and from "The future"

Originally posted by Tattoo
Where did I tell anyone what to do? I suggest you stop being a hero, I suggest you stop being an idiot. 🙂

I apologize. I really do. For YOUR sake. Please, read the article. You'll realize how silly you've looked all this time.

No one wants to read your article that has nothing to do with anything, okay? Is that so hard to understand?

Originally posted by Ravencrest
I apologize. I really do. For YOUR sake. Please, read the article. You'll realize how silly you've looked all this time.

I read the first paragraph...it's a false article...still that doesn't change the fact of the thread poster being an idiot.

No, you wont, tattoo. Its a satire article. Note everything about how Michael Jackson was found Guilty, even though he wasn't. And also note the date under the headline. Thank you, goodbye.

Newspapers tend to be half fictionalised. They are suppose to be unbias, but i find them to be more then often biased. They write the crap to get readers. you'll not understand the full proper story ever from reading a newspaper. They tend to leave things out and fabricate other things in.

Originally posted by Lana
No one wants to read your article that has nothing to do with anything, okay? Is that so hard to understand?

Why do you choose to be so ignorant? Do you not understand that you all simply mistook what I meant by that article because you didn't bother to read it? Sad.

Originally posted by Ravencrest
Why do you choose to be so ignorant? Do you not understand that you all simply mistook what I meant by that article because you didn't bother to read it? Sad.

Now i'm going to be the bigger man here, and walk away from your stupidity, even though you might not.

Originally posted by Tattoo
I read the first paragraph...it's a false article...still that doesn't change the fact of the thread poster being an idiot.

Since I've allowed you to embarrass yourself long enough, I'm going to do something special and end this misery. I posted the article as a satire to the thread because the thread is basically a joke, in my opinion. You went on to continue on how I was a hero because you thought I actually posted an article in all seriousness. I asked you to READ the article. Out of ignorance and assumptions, you did not bother. You continued, even calling me an idiot and said I was going nowhere.

Even after trying to tell you numerous times, you chose not to bother to browse over the article.

Originally posted by Ravencrest
Why do you choose to be so ignorant? Do you not understand that you all simply mistook what I meant by that article because you didn't bother to read it? Sad.

Ignorant?

No, try not giving a flying ****.

No one cares about the stupid article. No one did, no one will. Deal with it.

Originally posted by Captain Maynard
I don't understand why you keep calling us "Sad". Thats awfully rude. Calling us ignorant. Earlier you were bitching at me for saying too Kali that no one likes him. Thats being a hypocrite. Now that is Sad.

Now i'm going to be the bigger man here, and walk away from your stupidity, even though you might not.

I called you sad? Don't assume what I meant by a vague comment. I think the situation is sad. I called Tattoo ignorant because, as I proved, he was being ignorant. Hypocrisy? Where?

Originally posted by Ravencrest
Why do you choose to be so ignorant? Do you not understand that you all simply mistook what I meant by that article because you didn't bother to read it? Sad.

Forgive me for reading the title to an article to save time and replying in such fashion that it had something to do with this thread, especially with you quoting me. 😐

Actually, no, I'm not asking for forgiveness, you're still an idiot.

Originally posted by Lana
Ignorant?

No, try not giving a flying ****.

No one cares about the stupid article. No one did, no one will. Deal with it.

Then you choose to be ignorant. Why do you deny it? You're being ignorant by not reading the article. Ergo, you forfeited any upcoming awareness as to what I meant by the article.

On another, less moronic note, your joke sucked, thread starter. Try again later.

Originally posted by Ravencrest
I called you sad? Don't assume what I meant by a vague comment. I think the situation is sad. I called Tattoo ignorant because, as I proved, he was being ignorant. Hypocrisy? Where?

How did you prove I was being ignorant? I read the title to your falsified page and jumped to conclusions. That's not ignorance.

Originally posted by Tattoo
Forgive me for reading the title to an article to save time and replying in such fashion that it had something to do with this thread, especially with you quoting me. 😐

Actually, no, I'm not asking for forgiveness, you're still an idiot.

You're reported. Please stop calling me idiot. It's childish. I gave you several chances yet you remained ignorant. You're too stubborn to realize that you simply made a mistake. That's okay. I deal with it daily.

Originally posted by Ravencrest
Then you choose to be ignorant. Why do you deny it? You're being ignorant by not reading the article. Ergo, you forfeited any upcoming awareness as to what I meant by the article.

Ask me if I care.

I don't care about the article. I don't want to read the article. And I'm not wasting my time on it.

Originally posted by Lana
Ask me if I care.

I don't care about the article. I don't want to read the article. And I'm not wasting my time on it.

Originally posted by Tattoo
How did you prove I was being ignorant? I read the title to your falsified page and jumped to conclusions. That's not ignorance.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ignorance You lacked knowledge regarding the article. You continued to assume I was defending the thread starter. You even said you didn't need to read the article and when on in some empty rant about Michael and this female. If you had read the article, you would have realized I was simply joking with the link and it would've been left at that. Your lack of knowledge regarding the article (Inasmuch; Ignorance) left you assuming I was going against you by defending the thread starter. You said I was digging holes earlier? Okay then.

Originally posted by Lana
Ask me if I care.

I don't care about the article. I don't want to read the article. And I'm not wasting my time on it.

Then that's your right.