Angel Boards, Witchboards, and Ouija Boards Avoid Them

Originally posted by AngryManatee
It's apparent you've done your research

I don't see anything about bat fossils being linked to whales. You have failed.

Look closer.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I don't see anything about bat fossils being linked to whales. You have failed.

Nope, you have no scientific credibility. Hopefully god will forgive you one of these days for trying to impersonate an intelligent individual.

Originally posted by Boris
Look closer.

I still didn't read anything linking bats to whales.

Why would you, like you said yourself, bats don't come from whales.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I still didn't read anything linking bats to whales.

Why do you have this idea that bats evolved from whales or vice versa?

Originally posted by AngryManatee
Why do you have this idea that bats evolved from whales or vice versa?

I don't believe this you do. You believe in common ancestry right, then there should be millions of transitional fossils. Where are they?

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I don't believe this you do. You believe in common ancestry right, then there should be millions of transitional fossils. Where are they?

Confuscius say, man who fights others beliefs must know them first.

In other words, do a little research on the subject, because I'm tired of arguing this point regardless of how many times I've said the same statement in response to your erroneous observations, and you have still failed to make up an excuse about Homo sapiens neandertalensis. I'm gonna go smoke a bowl and sleep.

I don't expect an intelligent response when I wake up in the morning, concerning your understanding of the theory of evolution, or Homo sapiens neandertalensis.

Originally posted by AngryManatee
Confuscius say, man who fights others beliefs must know them first.

In other words, do a little research on the subject, because I'm tired of arguing this point regardless of how many times I've said the same statement in response to your erroneous observations, and you have still failed to make up an excuse about Homo sapiens neandertalensis. I'm gonna go smoke a bowl and sleep.

I don't expect an intelligent response when I wake up in the morning, concerning your understanding of the theory of evolution, or Homo sapiens neandertalensis.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/Docs/263.asp

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
http://www.answersingenesis.org/Docs/263.asp

Originally posted by AngryManatee
And what disease (i may know which one it is they claim, but I just want you to say it so I can laugh and correct you) would that be that led to neadertal's apearence? Did this disease cause the differences in DNA compared to human?

Feel free to leave me something funny to wake up to tommorow.

Originally posted by AngryManatee

Malnutritional diseases.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Malnutritional diseases

The correct term is rickets, which would be contradictory to the fact that neandertal's bones are twice as strong as a human's. You fail.

Originally posted by AngryManatee
The correct term is rickets, which would be contradictory to the fact that neandertal's bones are twice as strong as a human's. You fail.

Malnutrition is but one theory and by the way affects more than just bone structure.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Malnutrition is but one theory and by the way affects more than just bone structure.

Yes, malnutrition results in stronger bones. You fail. Now I'll have to find something else to laugh at when I wake up tommorow. Oh well...

Originally posted by AngryManatee
Yes, malnutrition results in stronger bones. You fail. Now I'll have to find something else to laugh at when I wake up tommorow. Oh well...

You appear to use puerile remarks to mask something or make you feel better. Are you afraid of being wrong?

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You appear to use puerile remarks to mask something or make you feel better. Are you afraid of being wrong?

I'd also like to note that the individual that that site was talking about was an elderly specimen of neandertal who had age related problems including arthritis. They in fact stood upright like a human. You're falling back on 100 year old science again. You fail.

Originally posted by AngryManatee
I'd also like to note that the individual that that site was talking about was an elderly specimen of neandertal, they in fact stood upright like a human. You're falling back on 100 year old science again. You fail.

It is still relevant.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
It is still relevant.

No, the fact that, when in peak condition, neandertal had a natural build that was equal to Arnold Schwarzennager when he was Mr. Universe, and bones that allowed powerful manipulation of their robust frame, points quite the opposite of malnutrition.

Here's a challenge: find an article in a scientific journal backing your claims. Post your findings in the morning for me to see.

Originally posted by AngryManatee
No, the fact that, when in peak condition, neandertal had a natural build that was equal to Arnold Schwarzennager when he was Mr. Universe, and bones that allowed powerful manipulation of their robust frame, points quite the opposite of malnutrition.

Here's a challenge: find an article in a scientific journal backing your claims. Post your findings in the morning for me to see.

Also arthritic changes.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Also arthritic changes.

Then why aren't these traits observed in humans of today and fossilized? Not to mention, how do you explain the differences in DNA sequencing?