Wolverine v.s Superman

Originally posted by His Airness
He did none of the gutting, or cutting in half you implied Wolverine would do in the Thor vs. Wolverine thread. This is while he had the luxury of a fairly potent team, and cheap shots. He was also smacked out the air, and countered mid swing. ermm

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
😕

1) He, like all the men involved in that fight, was under the effect of Jessica's pheromones.
2) Having massively superhuman sense he was even more susceptible to said pheromones then anyone else.
3) He admitted that said pheromones were making him dizzy, which would be his balance and coordination were suffering as a result of exposure to the pheromones
4) He did damage Wrecker (who FYI, isn't a god), thrice.
5) Wolverine and the Avengers didn't show up to kill Wrecker in the middle of Suburbia; meaning his attacks were purposely nonlethal.
6) That single showing is out of line with a) every one of Wrecker's appearances and b) every one of the New Avenger's appearances as most of the team could solo him.

Originally posted by His Airness
This is all your twisted, biased interpretation of the comic. A interpretation that was consistently shunted by seasoned, credible debaters in the Wolverine, Wrecker thread. ermm

Its all stated right in the issue. The only dispute was between Mungi and I, and that was only because we were mistaking the point the other was making. We both agreed with what the other was saying when we released what the other was actually saying.

So... try again?

Originally posted by Jebus reborn
While we're on the topic... can anyone explain to me Superman/Batman #31?
Apparently in that comic, Superman was this:

Originally posted by His Airness
This is all your twisted, biased interpretation of the comic. A interpretation that was consistently shunted by seasoned, credible debaters in the Wolverine, Wrecker thread. ermm

Tell me how is #1 not true? Can she selectivly choose where her airborne particles go?

How is #2 not true? Did Wolveirne shut off his senses in the fight?

How is #3 not true? Its' pis because it explains wolvie's diminished abilities?

etc and so on.

Who lives in a pineapple under the sea?

Originally posted by jinzin
Apparently... I mean Multitudes of evidence of Thor being owned by people in Wolverine's speed range means nothing as long as Thor's fought Heralds and Gods.... you know... with his powers of course.. 😕

Selective? heaven's no... I mean it's clear as day that Wolverine didn't cut Herc with that glancing bone-claw blow, and that totally means that he can't cut or stab Herc with adamantium claws. Which totally means he didn't stab Herc in that fight.... but, NO WAY did Wolverine win by pure brute strength.. oh I know 😱, Herc's an idiot and he exhausted himself to the point of a KO... right....? guys?... 😕

🙁

And Hulk? Whatever man, he's totally weak when it comes to durability... plus he beats Wolverine all the time when Wolverine stabs and eviscerates the shit out of him, of course Thor's gonna do the same.. pssssh.. 🙄

Because: like I said before, labeling me a fanboy, gives him/them the impression that my proof and argument has no validity behind it, thus relenquishing them of the burdern of proof themselves.. But as long as you ignore the fallacy behind ad hominem that's okay. 😉

You know whats funny? You don't even read Thor, something that was made fairly evident in the vs thread. The only exposure you get of Thor, is his pis poor appearances in Avengers comics and his few guest appearances in other miscellaneous comics. You'd be oblivious to the vast majority of his more impressive feats, this is obviously the reason why you use his lowest feats to support your arguments.

When did Hulk become Thor?

Your credibility equals Wolverines chances against Thor; 0. ermm

Originally posted by jinzin
You do of course know I'll be writing my follow up to your response in the Thor thread tommorrow or the next day, and when I' do I'm going to CA-RUSH you. 😐

Kinda like I did last time. 😬

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
Its all stated right in the issue. The only dispute was between Mungi and I, and that was only because we were mistaking the point the other was making. We both agreed with what the other was saying when we released what the other was actually saying.

So... try again?

Mungi and the rest of the posters in the thread. Most, like me were pointing and laughing at your twisted interpretations of the comic.

Originally posted by His Airness
You know whats funny? You don't even read Thor, something that was made fairly evident in the vs thread.

Something that I admitted to flat out without shame or remorse.. 😕

Originally posted by His Airness
The only exposure you get of Thor, is his pis poor appearances in Avengers comics and his few guest appearances in other miscellaneous comics. You'd be oblivious to the vast majority of his more impressive feats,

Which is why I keep repeatedly asking you ridiculous people to post them. 😬

Originally posted by His Airness
this is obviously the reason why you use his lowest feats to support your arguments.

Originally posted by His Airness
When did Hulk become Thor?

Your credibility equals Wolverines chances against Thor; 0. ermm

Coming from the guy who throws out titles and insults as a methd of debate... I'm not bothered.

Absorbent and yellow and porous is he.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Credibility is a matter of opinion. But this tends to lean to an appeal to both authority and the populus.

Tell me how is #1 not true? Can she selectivly choose where her airborne particles go?

How is #2 not true? Did Wolveirne shut off his senses in the fight?

How is #3 not true? Its' pis because it explains wolvie's diminished abilities?

etc and so on.

How do pheromones diminish the density, and effectiveness of admantium claws?

If nautical nonsense be something you wish...

Then drop on the deck and flop like a fish! 😊

😆

I suppose this is the part of the song where we HAVE to say his name?

Ready?

Spongebob....

Originally posted by jinzin
Something that I admitted to flat out without shame or remorse.. 😕

Which is why I keep repeatedly asking you ridiculous people to post them. 😬

No, those are the feats that I've seen, I've seen nothing better, even when I went to the ol' Thor respect thread.. there was nothing... So again.. prove me wrong.. So far all you've done is say he can fight Surfer, which means less than nothing to me seeing how Rhino, DD, Spiderman, And T'challa have all be able to do that too.

When did Thor gain Hulk's healing ability and damage soak? 😕

Coming from the guy who throws out titles and insults as a methd of debate... I'm not bothered.

If you admitted as much, why do you debate a character you literally know nothing about?

Which is what was done. You cannot force you to change your opinion.

Read the comics as I pointed out on the vs thread. I don't feel the need to address something you've already left unattended to in the vs thread.

Thor's damage soak is actually superior to Hulk's.

The question should be, when did Hulk gain Thor's durability?

Again, you make me laugh. 😆

SquarePants!

YES.

Originally posted by Creshosk
If nautical nonsense be something you wish...