Mary Born without Original Sin ?

Started by Shakyamunison4 pages
Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I didn't want you to think that I was not responding to your post.

😄

But you didn't respond with any substance.

What do you think about the fact that man-god virgin birth was something that was put on Buddha, by his followers, 500 years before the followers of Jesus did the same thing?

JesusIsAlive Restricted

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
But you didn't respond with any substance.

What do you think about the fact that man-god virgin birth was something that was put on Buddha, by his followers, 500 years before the followers of Jesus did the same thing?

You basically responded with a reiteration and so did I.

Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You basically responded with a reiteration and so did I.

You failed to understand my point, No problem, I can understand. Now, please review the posts with the knowledge that nothing is meant to be a reiteration.

JesusIsAlive Restricted
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You failed to understand my point, No problem, I can understand. Now, please review the posts with the knowledge that nothing is meant to be a reiteration.

But it was a reiteration.

Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
But it was a reiteration.

So, you can't answer my question, therefore, you use a diversion. Now answer my question, please.

Let me guess; you don’t know what question I am talking about; or; you already answered my question; or; …

JesusIsAlive Restricted

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
So, you can't answer my question, therefore, you use a diversion. Now answer my question, please.

Let me guess; you don’t know what question I am talking about; or; you already answered my question; or; …

Correct, I don't know what you are talking about.

Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Correct, I don't know [B]what you are talking about. [/B]

What do you think about the fact that man-god virgin birth was something that was put on Buddha, by his followers, 500 years before the followers of Jesus did the same thing?

JesusIsAlive Restricted
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
What do you think about the fact that man-god virgin birth was something that was put on Buddha, by his followers, 500 years before the followers of Jesus did the same thing?

The Egyptians believed that Pharaoh was a divine man as well, it is nothing new.

Besides, did Buddha declare that he was divine? No? But Jesus did affirm His divinity on a number of occasions.

Well, I will talk to you later brother I got to get something to eat.

pizza pepsi

Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
The Egyptians believed that Pharaoh was a divine man as well, it is nothing new.

Besides, did Buddha declare that he was divine? No? But Jesus did affirm His divinity on a number of occasions.

Well, I will talk to you later brother I got to get something to eat.

pizza pepsi

You keep missing my point. The idea of making Jesus a man-god divine virgin birth, was nothing new or novel at the time of Jesus.

BTW Buddha said he was not divine but the pharaohs of Egypt, like Jesus, did claim to be divine. It seems that Buddha was the only one who was different, in that he had the wisdom to tell people that he was just human.

JesusIsAlive Restricted

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You keep missing my point. The idea of making Jesus a man-god divine virgin birth, was nothing new or novel at the time of Jesus.

BTW Buddha said he was not divine but the pharaohs of Egypt, like Jesus, did claim to be divine. It seems that Buddha was the only one who was different, in that he had the wisdom to tell people that he was just human.

But Jesus was divine and proved it when He rose from the dead.

Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
But Jesus was divine and proved it when He rose from the dead.

😆 Ya, the Egyptian Pharaohs also rose from the dead. 😆

JesusIsAlive Restricted
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
😆 Ya, the Egyptian Pharaohs also rose from the dead. 😆

No, they did not. Their sarcophaguses contain their mummified remains.

But Jesus' tomb is empty.

Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
No, they did not. There sarcophagus contains their mummified remains. But Jesus' tomb is empty.

You mean the one they found just recently with the bone of Jesus in it?

JesusIsAlive Restricted
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You mean the one they found just recently with the bone of Jesus in it?

Are you talking about that lie?

Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Are you talking about that lie?

No, I am talking about the lie that you believe.

Boris New Member
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
But Jesus' tomb is empty.

No it's not, Cameron found his remains.

Nellinator Crazy Canuck

Originally posted by Boris
No it's not, Cameron found his remains.
You consider Cameron a credible source? That's laughable.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
But you didn't respond with any substance.

What do you think about the fact that man-god virgin birth was something that was put on Buddha, by his followers, 500 years before the followers of Jesus did the same thing?

When did that legend about Buddha originate? The legend of the virgin birth of Buddha is quite a bit different than Mary's. Something along the lines of Maya being a virgin until the conception of Buddha, not a supernatural birth.

Goddess Kali Perfection

why does every thread eventually turn into a war ?

Emperor Ashtar Balloooooooooooooon
Originally posted by Boris
No it's not, Cameron found his remains.

Sounds like a Hoax.

Bicnarok From Ganymede

Nope, only 3 people were born without original sin, Adam Eve and Jesus.

The Catholic cult activity of Mary worship is a sin and rediculous. She was just some women, ok probably a good women other wise God wouldn´t have chose her