What is your Duality Argument?

Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
I added more BTW. . .

Yeah, although, I hardly run into the sub-topics...but I'm sure they are out there!

Here's a Martial Arts one: Gentle Hand Vs Iron-Fist

duality vs sensability.

Originally posted by Alliance
duality vs sensability.

it was only a matter of time, i was expecting that response a lot sooner. although the act of calling duality insensible ignores most of the structure in the world around us..

Functionalism Vs. Marxism.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Functionalism Vs. Vitalism.

Fixed it for you 😉

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
it was only a matter of time, i was expecting that response a lot sooner. although the act of calling duality insensible ignores most of the structure in the world around us..

No. Calling dualities insensable does not ignore the structure of the world, but rather ignores a false way in which we percieve structure in the world.

Originally posted by Alliance
No. Calling dualities insensable does not ignore the structure of the world, but rather ignores a false way in which we percieve structure in the world.

Because Reductionalism is the only way. . .Tell me, how do thoughts or information fit into Reductionalism?

Originally posted by Alliance
No. Calling dualities insensable does not ignore the structure of the world, but rather ignores a false way in which we percieve structure in the world.

hahaha, i am not arguing with you about a DNA issue of duality argument that is natural for us to chose in life/work/politics/games/spouse/debates, etc.

Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
Because Reductionalism is the only way. . .Tell me, how do thoughts or information fit into Reductionalism?

I'm sure your referring to reductionism.

Reductionism is effective, but it depends on how it is used. If over used, it creates false categories, grouping things together that are logically distinct. 100% black and white gives you a 0% RESOLUTION.

Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
Fixed it for you 😉

I was talking about sociological theories, each with their own paradigm. So, no, you didn't fix it.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I told (edit) her she thinks too little oftentimes.

hug it's ok bradock...

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
I was talking about sociological theories, each with their own paradigm.

My bad, I didn't know functionalism was a social logical theory.

Originally posted by Alliance
I'm sure your referring to reductionism.

Reductionism is effective, but it depends on how it is used. If over used, it creates false categories, grouping things together that are logically distinct. 100% black and white gives you a 0% RESOLUTION.

It can lead to Materialism.

Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
It can lead to Materialism.

Well, materialism would be impossible without material posessions...yet I doubt you are taking that path.

are you saying reductionism can leat to materialism?

What about orgasmism?

droolio

With humans it's always one extreme or another. Never an interval between he two. Unless someone's already mentioned it:

Race
Black x White

Originally posted by FeceMan
What about orgasmism?

droolio

As soon as that becomes a topic of issue I'll comment... until then
droolio

God exists vs God doesn't exist
Reductionism vs Holism

Holism.......youpi