Originally posted by DigiMark007
They both amp themselves with their power though. Either one could be stronger than the other at any given point, so it's kinda moot.
yeah but I'm going off of them not using any of that. They are just using thier power that they are starting out with. Who would win.
If neither are allowed to amp using cosmic energy/magic and just have to through down with what they have I'd give the nod to Thanos because he has physical augmentations that put him at a far higher base strength and his fighting ability h2h should be greater (assuming that Odin can't use Godspeed either).
In a purely physical fight, no amping, no powers, base physical characteristics, I'd take Thanos. He's more durable than an un-amped Asgardian.
With powers it's Odin every day of the week.
Originally posted by tkitnaJust that Masterson was able to put Odin down.
I'm confused from these scans. Are these supposed to mean that Thor is physically superior to Odin because he smacked an Odin that was possessed by loki with his Hammer? I'm just wondering.
It was all of Odin's powers, just that Loki was controlling his body.
Same durability, same strength, etc.
Also, I don't really believe that Thor is stronger than Odin, since that same Odin, had beaten the bejeebers out of Thor earlier (although he did use Thor's hammer).
If Odin amps himself up though (like when he fights Surtur), Thanos is going down.
