Venom Spin-off Movie

Started by Neo Darkhalen39 pages

but he is right there?

We need some news...

Fast.

Hurry up, Arad.

I bet he is siting there, laughing at us all.

He could be writing a better script.

Honestly, I thought Sam Raimi did a terrible job with Venom.

First off, Topher Grace was a very bad choice for Eddie Brock. Secondly, Venom's voice... my god, it was shitty. It was basically Topher's voice with very slight enhancement. That alone ruined it for me. Lastly, he died way too easily. One of the pumpkin grenades killed the symbiote and Brock (in other scenes, the same nades do only miniscule damage to Spidey and Harry).

Part of this may have been because Raimi never even wanted to use Venom, he did so simply because the character is so popular among the fans.

Regardless of the reason, Venom was pulled off terribley in Spider-Man 3. If they do make a Venom film, I'd suggest getting a new actor, director and have no ties to SM3.

Originally posted by SnakeEyes
Honestly, I thought Sam Raimi did a terrible job with Venom.

First off, Topher Grace was a very bad choice for Eddie Brock. Secondly, Venom's voice... my god, it was shitty. It was basically Topher's voice with very slight enhancement. That alone ruined it for me. Lastly, he died way too easily. One of the pumpkin grenades killed the symbiote and Brock (in other scenes, the same nades do only miniscule damage to Spidey and Harry).

Part of this may have been because Raimi never even wanted to use Venom, he did so simply because the character is so popular among the fans.

Regardless of the reason, Venom was pulled off terribley in Spider-Man 3. If they do make a Venom film, I'd suggest getting a new actor, director and have no ties to SM3.

I agree there 100% with you.

Originally posted by SnakeEyes
Lastly, he died way too easily. One of the pumpkin grenades killed the symbiote and Brock (in other scenes, the same nades do only miniscule damage to Spidey and Harry).

thats a really good point...i dont know why i never realized that...

wtf? why did they kill him so easily???

Because the Director is a pathetic; childish fool, because he hated Venom and could not have his own way, he decided to totally destroy him in every way, instead of being professional and doing the job well, and NOT putting the GG 2 in the film.

Originally posted by atharpina
wtf? why did they kill him so easily???

How else could Peter have done it?

A symbiote (in his position anyway) would be pretty much impossible to get rid off.

Blowing it to smithereens is the only way to go.

Not entirely, he could have done what Spider-Man in the comics does and not kill living beings, he could have thrown it in the sea.

Originally posted by Neo Darkhalen
he could have done what Spider-Man in the comics does and not kill living beings.

lol

Originally posted by Neo Darkhalen
he could have thrown it in the sea.

Yeah, because the sea was VERY near.

Peter was a position where he had stop the thing already.

Yeah but us here at defy the great Venom or be obliterated fan club, just have to make these lame excuses, and you just pop up here don't you. 😂

Also SM never killed in the classic comics, the good comics before they got pathetically poor.

Originally posted by Neo Darkhalen
Also SM never killed in the classic comics

He snapped Gwen Stacy's neck!

😛

Now we never know that for sure......although it is more then likely. 😛

You are going on my friend list.

Originally posted by JediSamuraiMRB
He could be writing a better script.

That's the only excuse that I'll accept.

A better script, and planning the movie, and locations.

Hopefully.