Originally posted by Yoshi Paradise
I still liked Spiderman 3, though.In fact, I have the DVD.
so wat if u have the dvd i watched it for free on the internet haha an yh it is crap absolutly rubbish u only see venom for like 10 mins or somat an he was rubbish he was named the top villen so they cuda made him a lot better
Originally posted by Neo Darkhalen
Because Venom not only deserves one anyway, it is also compensation for the way he was treated in SM3.
Spider Man-type movies are expensive, with all the necessary VFX to make it work. Who wants to spend $150 million on a Spidey villain (who barely qualifies as an antihero?)
My problem with Venom, has always been that Eddie Brock has never been a character I can sympathize or empathize with, unlike other antiheroes - Magneto, Punisher, Black Adam come to mind. He only looks good compared to someone like Carnage.
Originally posted by roughrider
Spider Man-type movies are expensive, with all the necessary VFX to make it work. Who wants to spend $150 million on a Spidey villain (who barely qualifies as an antihero?)
My problem with Venom, has always been that Eddie Brock has never been a character I can sympathize or empathize with, unlike other antiheroes - Magneto, Punisher, Black Adam come to mind. He only looks good compared to someone like Carnage.
The fact that he is deadly and funny in the comics, topped with a cool design and being insane makes him an interesting character IMO.
Originally posted by Neo Darkhalen
The fact that he is deadly and funny in the comics, topped with a cool design and being insane makes him an interesting character IMO.
That description perfectly describes Deadpool, who I enjoy. He's insane in a funny way, while Brock is just...insane. With that freaky tongue & those teeth he likes to show off, I don't get why he has a heroic image to some.