"thanos fights and beats down thor with the power gem while u have raker a guy with a power ring just kicking his ass all over the place."
Thanos didn't beat Thor with power gem, he outsmarted him with tech. Without it, Thanos would've been assraped. Raker didn't beat Ds. Lmao dumbass, a win can't be DETERMINED by a brief scruffle. And when I say brief, I mean BRIEF.
"thanos fights odin and does pretty damn good with the fight not bing over. while thanos is held at bay with a shovel "
Lol, Odin was destroying Thanos. If that fight would've continued, then Thanos would have been dogshit. Btw Odin was probally holding back, Do you think he was going to use his full power, while in Asgard? And I didn't know Thanos was held at bay, with a shovel. 🙄 Ay, since you said it, it's fact.
"point1 thanos is more focused and has been more successful in the past at seeing his goals out and getting the cosmic cube,infinity gems, and the heart while darkseid hasnt gotten the ale yet or hasnt taken over new genesis yet"
Point 1, your an idiot, Thanos is good at taking advantage, of situation. You know, like striking when unexpected? Too bad that's not going to help him, in this situation. Unless of he's allowed to bring a plot device, then he's not over powering, Apokoliptian tech.
"point2 thanos is better with hand to hand. with fights such as thor with power gem,odin,and tyrant, and beating his doppleganger who was more powerful in infinity war prove this. while darkseid has lost to doomsday,superman 3 times, and was losing to raker."
Point 2, your retarded, Thanos LOST to everybody he faced. He was lossing to pg Thor, getting raped by Odin(hell he was just standing, he couldn't do shit), needed a power up to face Tyrant, and had help, when faced his "superior", as you may say. Must've not been that powerful if he did, and besides there's too big of a power gap, between Seid and Thanos. The Doomsday loss was an avatar, Superman SHOULDN'T be beating Ds(besides, those 3 storys are crap, and one of them doesn't count anyways 😆 ), he didn't lose to Raker, he DIDN'T WANT TO KILL HIM, because he wanted him to stay, on Apokolips.
"point 4 is that darkseid also relies heavily on his army or others to do his bidding for him. this to me weakens him as a character in the fact that he relies on them to much all the time. while thanos needs no planet of followeres backing him up and has accomplished much much more!"
Point 4, your a moron, how does Seid RELY, on his army? So Ds should doing everything for himself, despite having a MASSIVE army? I'm not going to bother with this one.
"point 5 the omega effect. how is thanos going to deal with darkseids ace card. well superman didnt have any trouble just using heat vision on it. the omega effect is nothing thanos couldnt just get out of on the fly but with prep its almost a given it wont touch thanos."
Point 5, you are braindeaded, the ONLY time Superman reflected the Oe, was in a bullshit story, that was plain embarrising(and not just to Ds, but comics in general). On Kmc, we use a characters MOST consistant portrayal, to determine their abilities. And guess what? The Oe has worked MORE times, on people STRONGER than Supes.
"point 6 thanos is better with prep than darkseid."
Point 6, your stupid, without a plot device, Thanos is NOT beating an entire Apokoliptian army, with just as much preparation.
Point 7, talking to yourself, is a sign of insanity 😐
Originally posted by starkingdo u realize the way u deal with losses of ds to supes and doomsday by saying they dont count. hahhaahhaha its canon like i always say deal. thanos was losing to odin then fight wasnt over. darkseid was losing to raker the fight wasnt over. raker sucks ass to odin. see the difference. quit counting all of ds feast and outright IGNORING HIS HUMILIATING CRUSHING LOSSES.
"thanos fights and beats down thor with the power gem while u have raker a guy with a power ring just kicking his ass all over the place."Thanos didn't beat Thor with power gem, he outsmarted him with tech. Without it, Thanos would've been assraped. Raker didn't beat Ds. Lmao dumbass, a win can't be DETERMINED by a brief scruffle. And when I say brief, I mean BRIEF.
"thanos fights odin and does pretty damn good with the fight not bing over. while thanos is held at bay with a shovel "
Lol, Odin was destroying Thanos. If that fight would've continued, then Thanos would have been dogshit. Btw Odin was probally holding back, Do you think he was going to use his full power, while in Asgard? And I didn't know Thanos was held at bay, with a shovel. 🙄 Ay, since you said it, it's fact.
"point1 thanos is more focused and has been more successful in the past at seeing his goals out and getting the cosmic cube,infinity gems, and the heart while darkseid hasnt gotten the ale yet or hasnt taken over new genesis yet"
Point 1, your an idiot, Thanos is good at taking advantage, of situation. You know, like striking when unexpected? Too bad that's not going to help him, in this situation. Unless of he's allowed to bring a plot device, then he's not over powering, Apokoliptian tech.
"point2 thanos is better with hand to hand. with fights such as thor with power gem,odin,and tyrant, and beating his doppleganger who was more powerful in infinity war prove this. while darkseid has lost to doomsday,superman 3 times, and was losing to raker."
Point 2, your retarded, Thanos LOST to everybody he faced. He was lossing to pg Thor, getting raped by Odin(hell he was just standing, he couldn't do shit), needed a power up to face Tyrant, and had help, when faced his "superior", as you may say. Must've not been that powerful if he did, and besides there's too big of a power gap, between Seid and Thanos. The Doomsday loss was an avatar, Superman SHOULDN'T be beating Ds(besides, those 3 storys are crap, and one of them doesn't count anyways 😆 ), he didn't lose to Raker, he DIDN'T WANT TO KILL HIM, because he wanted him to stay, on Apokolips.
"point 4 is that darkseid also relies heavily on his army or others to do his bidding for him. this to me weakens him as a character in the fact that he relies on them to much all the time. while thanos needs no planet of followeres backing him up and has accomplished much much more!"
Point 4, your a moron, how does Seid RELY, on his army? So Ds should doing everything for himself, despite having a MASSIVE army? I'm not going to bother with this one.
"point 5 the omega effect. how is thanos going to deal with darkseids ace card. well superman didnt have any trouble just using heat vision on it. the omega effect is nothing thanos couldnt just get out of on the fly but with prep its almost a given it wont touch thanos."
Point 5, you are braindeaded, the ONLY time Superman reflected the Oe, was in a bullshit story, that was plain embarrising(and not just to Ds, but comics in general). On Kmc, we use a characters MOST consistant portrayal, to determine their abilities. And guess what? The Oe has worked MORE times, on people STRONGER than Supes.
"point 6 thanos is better with prep than darkseid."
Point 6, your stupid, without a plot device, Thanos is NOT beating an entire Apokoliptian army, with just as much preparation.
Point 7, talking to yourself, is a sign of insanity 😐
Originally posted by quanchi112Do you relize, that you suck at debating? Ds's MOST consistant portrayal, puts ABOVE most skyfathers. So why do we have to use him, when he's Superman's peer? And Quantard, Ds DIDN'T want to kill Raker, meaning those cheapshots he put on Seid, are irrelevent to this discussion.
do u realize the way u deal with losses of ds to supes and doomsday by saying they dont count. hahhaahhaha its canon like i always say deal. thanos was losing to odin then fight wasnt over. darkseid was losing to raker the fight wasnt over. raker sucks ass to odin. see the difference. quit counting all of ds feast and outright IGNORING HIS HUMILIATING CRUSHING LOSSES.