Anthropic Principle (or Anthropic Coincidences) What do you know about them?

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Anthropic Principle (or Anthropic Coincidences) What do you know about them?

This is the thread topic not riddles.

Do you really want me to make a tread just for this? Why not and try to answer it?

The answer to the riddle requires lateral thinking. Something I'm sure JIA is wholly incapable of.

Well it is pointless now because you either have dismissed this simple request or looked it up because you think that I'm trying to trick you which just goes to show your mistrust of man.

Originally posted by PITT_HAPPENS
It is a simple question and one was the last time that any thread has stayed on topic? 😉

Do you really want me to make a tread just for this? Why not and try to answer it?

I got a better idea: why not stick to the thread topic?

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I got a better idea: why not stick to the thread topic?

I got a better idea: why don't you answer criticism?

..and quit opening stupid redundant threads.

Originally posted by Alliance
I got a better idea: why don't you answer criticism?

..and quit opening stupid redundant threads.

Which criticism?

*sigh*

Originally posted by Alliance
*sigh*

Sigh^2

S I G H
I
G
H

Originally posted by Alliance
S I G H
I
G
H

Sight * 2

oh...

there are plenty of comments in this thread alone (of mine and from others) that you have not responded too, even just one page back. You systematically ignore criticism, which makes your points seem alarmingly invalid.

Originally posted by Alliance
oh...

there are plenty of comments in this thread alone (of mine and from others) that you have not responded too, even just one page back. You systematically ignore criticism, which makes your points seem alarmingly invalid.

All criticism is not created equally.

Yeah, you and inequality seem to get along pretty damn well.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I got a better idea: why not stick to the thread topic?

Nah, it really proves nothing. Just that he can't understand poor grammar.

Originally posted by Alliance
Nah, it really proves nothing. Just that he can't understand poor grammar.

Originally posted by PITT_HAPPENS
It's not really poor grammar, but the lack that he can't see different ways of reading the same thing.

hahaha

thats what I thought it was, but it seemed really lame

*slaps forehead*

Originally posted by PITT_HAPPENS
JIA, I have a riddle for you. I have to coins totaling 55 cents and one of them is not a 50 cent piece, what are they?

This is not just a simple riddle but a test in the way you think, I would like you to try and answer this without trying to look it up.

A 50 cent piece and a nickel? You just said that one of them is not a 50 cent piece.

😕

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
A 50 cent piece and a nickel? You just said that [b]one of them is not a 50 cent piece.

😕 [/B]

It was a stupid question, wasn't it? He was twisting the meaning of the words in such a way to trick you into making the wrong choice. Kind of like what some Christians do with the bible; twist the words to mean what they want and then claim that god gave them the interpretation through faith.

Originally posted by Alliance
Nah, it really proves nothing. Just that he can't understand poor grammar.

It is not poor grammar. It says exactly what it is supposed to say.