Originally posted by Charlotte DeBel
Pluto is smaller than the Earth. The object TWICE the size of Earth equals to 5 or sixt Plutos and according to laws of physic would fulfill rules 2 and 3 of being a planet.
In fact Earth or Moon have chances to become sattelites of said "asteroid".
Read it again. In order to officially be a planet it has to meet the following criteria:
* is in orbit around the Sun (fail)
* has sufficient mass so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape (fail)
* has "cleared the neighborhood" around its orbit (fail since it had no orbit).
The asteroid fails all 3 criteria in order to become classified as a planet.
Darling, according to the laws of physics asteroid huge enough to be twice the size of Earth would AUTHOMATICALLY fulfill laws 2&3 of that rule. That one wasn't portrayed to be able to do that- that leaves only one explanation- it was made of superlight material thus had VERY small gravity field- much smaller that the one of the object twice as small at it. In that case Hulk's big feat looks not that big since "TEH BIG AZZTROID" was sort of space gas balloon.
An ASTEROID bigger than Venus and Earth COMBINED? BS.
Originally posted by Charlotte DeBel
Darling, according to the laws of physics asteroid huge enough to be twice the size of Earth would AUTHOMATICALLY fulfill laws 2&3 of that rule. That one wasn't portrayed to be able to do that- that leaves only one explanation- it was made of superlight material thus had VERY small gravity field- much smaller that the one of the object twice as small at it. In that case Hulk's big feat looks not that big since "TEH BIG AZZTROID" was sort of space gas balloon.
An ASTEROID bigger than Venus and Earth COMBINED? BS.
First off, let me say that there are no laws in physics in terms of what is considered a planet versus what isn't considered a planet. Your logic fails there. When you keep saying laws of physics, it shows that you don't really study science enough to know what a law of physics even is.
Secondly I just stated directly how it fails all three scientific criteria, which you have yet to refute. I will restate it yet again - the asteroid had no orbit, it wasn't sufficiently round enough, and it didn't clear any orbit of other celestial bodies.
You could have an object that was as big as Jupiter, and if it failed those criteria, then it would not be considered a planet. If you want to debate that, feel free to take it up with the IAU, a credible authority of what is and isn't a planet.
Originally posted by Charlotte DeBelTo bad it's a comic that really doesn't matter what would scientifically apply since a green man that grows stronger with rage did the feat.
Darling, according to the laws of physics asteroid huge enough to be twice the size of Earth would AUTHOMATICALLY fulfill laws 2&3 of that rule. That one wasn't portrayed to be able to do that- that leaves only one explanation- it was made of superlight material thus had VERY small gravity field- much smaller that the one of the object twice as small at it. In that case Hulk's big feat looks not that big since "TEH BIG AZZTROID" was sort of space gas balloon.
An ASTEROID bigger than Venus and Earth COMBINED? BS.
Originally posted by TricksterPriestDoes anybody know when WWH took place and if BlackBolt is really a skrull in it?
and the Black Bolt feat is thrown out the window. Or did everyone forget about 'Skrull Bolt' ? 😛
Originally posted by Sirius77I'm not downplaying the feat but Emperor Joker's time was a warped reality to fit Joker's little warped mind. Has he ever shown anything like that in a reality not governed by Joker?
Not that I'm aware of, but if you're trying to downplay the feat, that still doesn't mean that superman isn't capable of it.He healed in three panels, thats hardly instantly... Hv doesn't last three panels.
Also, it could wiegh more. Metals wiegh more than silicates.
Any object has a gravity field. The gravity field is determined by object's mass. Logically speaking, an object TWICE the size of Earth shouild have gravity field strong enough to at least make Earth its sattelite, not FALLING on Earth. If Earth's gravity field attracted the object twice the size of the planet, that object should:
a)have no gravity at all *BS*
b)be very lightweight and have small density which makes Hulk's big feat BS- there's no big deal to rip apart the ball of cotton, even the biggest one.
Originally posted by Charlotte DeBel
Any object has a gravity field. The gravity field is determined by object's mass. Logically speaking, an object TWICE the size of Earth shouild have gravity field strong enough to at least make Earth its sattelite, not FALLING on Earth. If Earth's gravity field attracted the object twice the size of the planet, that object should:
a)have no gravity at all *BS*
b)be very lightweight and have small density which makes Hulk's big feat BS- there's no big deal to rip apart the ball of cotton, even the biggest one.
all objects with mass are attracted together. They don't automatically begin an orbital relationship often they collide. In all likelihood the earth was just in the asteroid's path. Objects only orbit if it has enough angular momentum to keep from being dragged into other objects centre of gravity.
blow
Whats considered a planet.. in lamens physics term..
IF IT IS A PLANET, WHEN YOU REMOVE IT FROM THE SOLAR SYSTEM, IT WILL F*** UP ALL THE OTHER PLANETS' ORBIT AND SPIN. IF YOU REMOVE THIS SO CALLED PLANET AND EVERYTHING IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM STILL STAYS THE SAME THEN NO, IT WAS NOT A PLANET TO BEGIN WITH.
Originally posted by Charlotte DeBel
Darling, according to the laws of physics asteroid huge enough to be twice the size of Earth would AUTHOMATICALLY fulfill laws 2&3 of that rule. That one wasn't portrayed to be able to do that- that leaves only one explanation- it was made of superlight material thus had VERY small gravity field- much smaller that the one of the object twice as small at it. In that case Hulk's big feat looks not that big since "TEH BIG AZZTROID" was sort of space gas balloon.
An ASTEROID bigger than Venus and Earth COMBINED? BS.
Comic. Book. Physics.
😐
Originally posted by GalvaclawThat would be extremely dumb..though a few years in comic time would probably be in the 70's. Though I guess now it begs the question did Hulk's losses to BB come before or after the Kree-Skrull War which BB may have became a Skrull in?
Yeah. The Kree-Skrull war was a storyline from the 70's so that invalidates a large number of comics if true. I imagine it will only of been the last few years.Then again seeing what Marvel have done with Spider-man I wouldn't put it past them.