An atheist speech.

Oh, KK...

...YOU READ HITLER'S WORK!?

Most historians try and pull themselves through it.

But you aren't a historian, you're a Christorian.

Originally posted by The Grey Fox
But you aren't a historian, you're a Christorian.

I suppose that I am more of a Christorian than a Christian...

Cool, that's pretty good.

OK I'll let you off

I studied Christianity, well, more biblical studies.

I'm studying that soon too, me being a Religious Studies student (as you know)

What Uni you going too?

London College of Economics, they do everything there not just Economics, although Econ is their primary one.

Hence the name I guess.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Hence the name I guess.

Nah, silly, London doesn't mean economics ...

I'm not really so offensive to Christianity, I'm just being Devils' Advocate, to see your responses.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Nah, silly, London doesn't mean economics ...

You really do go out your way dont you...

lol

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
You really do go out your way dont you...

Nope, not really...my actions are linear...

ééé

...well, i think what we have all agreed here is the following:

>Richard Dawkins is an intellegent man.
>However, he has a vendetta against religion which leads to his flawed one sided assaults on religious people and ideals.
>He is not very valuble when discussing religious matters as he is biased.

Im still not too sure about the last two but obvoulsy I will have to read more about him.

As it stand I am verging towards Pro-Dawkins eventhough I am very religous.

Well, Dawkins would not have a very high opinion of you.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
...well, i think what we have all agreed here is the following:

>Richard Dawkins is an intellegent man.
>However, he has a vendetta against religion which leads to his flawed one sided assaults on religious people and ideals.
>He is not very valuble when discussing religious matters as he is biased.

...how did we agree on that?

I certainly don't agree with 2 and 3.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Well, Dawkins would not have a very high opinion of you.

That's it buddy, show me that "Official spokesman of Dawkins" card immediately.