Doomsday vs Thanos

Originally posted by carver9
Stop lying... someone brought up thanos using a shield and you said"no he didnt". That's ok though because the next time you troll I am reporting you.

If I see one more post where someone is accusing, name-calling, flaming, trolling or breaking any other rules then warnings/temp bans will be the result.

When a mod posts for people to settle down, stop trolling, stop flaming, or to stop breaking any rules, then that's the end of the discussion. Any further concerns can be taken up via PMs. The next person who argues with a mod or quotes a mod's post to accuse, argue, point fingers, etc. will get a warning/temp ban.

Originally posted by Nihilist
Stop lying you said he never used a shield in B&T, and as Bada said to ODG its on you to prove he used a gun(shield in ODG's case), when it clear in the comic he had no gun on him at all during the entire fight.

And stop reporting like you do in every single thread, if you cant debate using actual knowledge or proof, dont enter the thread and start debating.

Tell you what show me a scan of Thanos holding a gun during the Odin fight or i'll report you for trolling.

I report because you bash me and pretty much every other person I see you debate in every thread.

1: Its not trolling its debating.
2: It can't be said either way.But like I have said before it was shown for him to have used it against thor.

And even if he did use it without the gun it would be a one time feat and and wouldn't be incorporated into his powerset.

Originally posted by carver9
Stop lying... someone brought up thanos using a shield and you said"no he didnt". That's ok though because the next time you troll I am reporting you.

Originally posted by Ouallada
You're completely missing the point.

The point isn't whether or not it'd be basic equipment. The point is that it was shown on panel that what was originally shown on panel to be achieved with tech was later shown to be replicated without it, and that there is a pretty good reason why tech is used at times even when one has the innate ability to accomplish something. The basic equipment thing only comes into play IF you can show that it was a tech augmentation against Odin. Which you can't.

In short, Thanos' force block against Odin was shown to be without tech. If you are drawing a conclusion that one occurence (Odin) has to be tech due to the other, the burden of proof is on you.

This would be tech which he has not used enough to be basic equipment/power.And thanos has had enough showings for the 3# rule to apply.

Somebody please explain what feat is being ignored? If it has to do with Thanos' shields then let me drop a deuce and chug some Jager first. sneer

thanduros

Please PM me any scans and explain what's happening. I'll look at it and post later.

Originally posted by Badabing
Somebody please explain what feat is being ignored? If it has to do with Thanos' shields then let me drop a deuce and chug some Jager first. sneer

thanduros

Please PM me any scans and explain what's happening. I'll look at it and post later.

I'll accept that it would be a tech augmentation to his powerset but it still wouldn't be used enough to be considered a valid feat correct?

Originally posted by Black bolt z
It was the feat about thanos using/not using the gun on odin that he did to thor.

I'll accept that it would be a tech augmentation to his powerset but it still wouldn't be used enough to be considered a valid feat correct?

The topic is DD vs Thanos. People should debate that topic.

Originally posted by Badabing
I'd have tp see the scans or comic.

The topic is DD vs Thanos. People should debate that topic.

I still call HP DD for 7/10.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
I said I don't remember him using the gun.And you can't say he didn't use the gun. If it had shown him put odin in a block with him and odin in the same panel yes I would say he didn't need the gun but it didn't.And it can't be said either way as its speculation.

I report because you bash me and pretty much every other person I see you debate in every thread.

1: Its not trolling its debating.

2: It can't be said either way.But like I have said before it was shown for him to have used it against thor.

And even if he did use it without the gun it would be a one time feat and and wouldn't be incorporated into his powerset.

Originally posted by Nihilist
Stop lying again, you stated several times he didnt use a gun, it can be said one way he didnt use a gun against Odin so his earlier showing is void as he had advanced/incorperated it into his powerset.

You reported me because you like to bait and when i give it back you act all hurt, if you dont like debating with me then dont, espicially when you havent read what we are talking about.

Its trolling, more than one person has said its on you to prove he used a gun to back up your argument and yet you still keep saying the same thing over and over again.
And not against Odin, so it can be said he didnt use it against Odin fact.

How is it a one time feat, he used a force block twice, he just advanced/made a easier way of using it the second time 1. And why cat it be incorperated into his powerset? HP Doomsday only adapted on flye twice, so i suppose that doesnt count eh.

No I reported you because of the bashing.

because what I keep saying doesn't seem to sink in for you guys...

What?This makes no sense.

Hes only proven to use it once and thats with the gun.Even if he did incorporate it its still only a 1-2 time feat.

As for HP DD he has limited showings.Obviously if someone(this was brought up in a morlun thread)doesn't have a certain amount of showings that rule doesn't apply.If someone has only 10-15 showings then that rule wouldn't apply as then they would have practically have no valid feats.HP DD only has close to that amount of showings.

Thanos has what?Upwards of 100?

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Seriously, what is H/P Doomsday's greatest claim to fame here? Having to be BFRed by a hero who couldn't take him on straight up? Savage Hulk did that way back in Hulk #300. Hell, Superman and Orion resorted to that against the General in JLA #39. And that maneuver was used again by a Guardian against SuperEmo Prime in Sinestro Corps War. H/P Doomsday was a shallow derivative of the Hulk, and not even a good one. This is but one of several reasons why he is overrated.

He left Darkseid for dead and adapted on the fly as well as from every previous fight. How is that overrated?

Since this is H/P DD, all previous feats of Doomsday apply, including the murder of hundreds of Green Lanterns.

Doomsday killed Superman - im pretty sure can handle Thanos

Originally posted by Firefly218
Doomsday killed Superman - im pretty sure can handle Thanos

Originally posted by Firefly218
Doomsday killed Superman - im pretty sure can handle Thanos

What is more impressive. He defeated an Avatar of Darkseid which is more powerful then Thanos.

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
What is more impressive. He defeated an Avatar of Darkseid which is more powerful then Thanos.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Not at all. Thanos is far more powerful than Darkseid.

I think he is as powerful as an average Avatar of Darkseid but far below the abstract Darkseid.

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
I think he is as powerful as an average Avatar of Darkseid but far below the abstract Darkseid.

wow to this thread haha...i love how an avatar of darkseid is more powerful than thanos

good joke

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
I think he is as powerful as an average Avatar of Darkseid but far below the abstract Darkseid.

Originally posted by Brockalizer
When Darksied starts some shit Superman or Orion can show up and handle him themselves. When Thanos starts some shit it usually takes either the combined efforts of some of the universe's most powerful heroes or Thanos himself to stop it.

Darkseid beats Superman more than vice versa. In fact, there are very few times, if any, where Superman has actually beaten Darkseid by himself.

Orion, by the same token, is a special circumstance.

Final Crisis.