Doomsday vs Thanos

Originally posted by carver9
I know how you feel. Blackbolt is the most irritating debator I have played against since debating on kmc. He erks my nerve... drives me INSANE with his "no he didn't" or "yes he did" comments.

Originally posted by Nihilist
This convinces me that you havent read the arc at all and are just trolling.

Originally posted by carver9
Yep because thanos "did" use his shields but thor hammered straight through it. That is why I was like WOW when I read his post and its pretty obvious thanos didn't have a gun on him. First thing, that gun was big as hell that thanos shot thor with and we seen thanos numerous of time in that fight against odin and there wasnt a big ass gun visible. So he either shitted the gun out and then shot it at odin or he never came to the battle with a gun.

I don't even know why people is arguing with him about this since the proof is on him. He need to prove that thanos walked around with that weapon because its pretty much safe to say that he added it to his power since he has done similar things in the past.

You can't say either way.Either way its just speculation as it didn't show him.But it did show him with the gun.Me:1 you:0

Originally posted by Ouallada
Is there seriously an assumption that Thanos can't/didn't produce the force block against Odin just because he used tech previously against Thor? I might be able to lift 60kg under my own power. Would using a pully system mean that I can't lift said weight? Nope. It just means that I can lift that weight easier. Regardless of whether it is within his own abilities or a tech-based augmentation, it's part of his basic equipment from the get-go.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Ok carver explain how that helps his case? IN B&T thanos did not use a sheild against thor. It didn't show him when he used it.On panel it didn't show him.But it did show him on panel using it with the gun.

You can't say either way.Either way its just speculation as it didn't show him.But it did show him with the gun.Me:1 you:0

Yes it did show him use the shield and it showed it SHATTERING against thors hammer. Nhihilst... post this for him... educate him please.

Prove that thanos had a big a** gun on him or get off the topic. They showed him standing face to face with odin and they also showed his entirebody numerous of times in that fight... show us the gun please.

Originally posted by carver9
Yes it did show him use the shield and it showed it SHATTERING against thors hammer. Nhihilst... post this for him... educate him please.

Prove that thanos had a big a** gun on him or get off the topic. They showed him standing face to face with odin and they also showed his entirebody numerous of times in that fight... show us the gun please.

It didn't show thanos when he sued the gun.How many times do I have to say this?To say he did or didn't use it either way would be speculation.But he was shown to have used it against thor.Me still:1 You still:0

Originally posted by Black bolt z
I remember no gun.What comic was this?Cuz my B&T comics are spread throughout my comic boxes and I'm not going to go digging through them til I remember the exact one.

It didn't show thanos when he sued the gun.How many times do I have to say this?To say he did or didn't use it either way would be speculation.But he was shown to have used it against thor.Me still:1 You still:0

Where did thanos keep the gun at during the odin fight because it wasn't visible when they showed his entire body and the gun is huge... so where was it?

Blackbolt you are seriously becoming annoying. Listen... There was NO GUN when Thanos used it on Odin.... You see no gun but you DO SEE a twinkle in Thanos eye and then bam a FB around Odin. Do you think that was a mere coincidence? I mean really are you joking. Thanos doesn't just twinkle his eyes for no reason.. where the hell do you get that stupid theory from.. Your theory is.. he twinkled is eye right when he pulled out a guy THAT WAS NEVER SHOWN? I mean really.. It's clear as day.. either he made that about of his own powerset or incorporated that tech with his other stuff.

Lastly, it supports mine for this reason and please pay attention. YOU THOUGH.. YOU THOUGHT.. that each fight they come back with knowledge of their previous fight and any adaptations they might have picked up from dying or just learning from the previous encounter. THAT IS TOTALLY WRONG. My view point is that they don't do that at all and come back with no knowledge or no adaptation... GET IT NOW.. You were wrong and you should admit when you are wrong.. at least sometimes.. MY GOD.

Originally posted by carver9
Where did thanos keep the gun at during the odin fight because it wasn't visible when they showed his entire body and the gun is huge... so where was it?

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Blackbolt you are seriously becoming annoying. Listen... There was NO GUN when Thanos used it on Odin.... You see no gun but you DO SEE a twinkle in Thanos eye and then bam a FB around Odin. Do you think that was a mere coincidence? I mean really are you joking. Thanos doesn't just twinkle his eyes for no reason.. where the hell do you get that stupid theory from.. Your theory is.. he twinkled is eye right when he pulled out a guy THAT WAS NEVER SHOWN? I mean really.. It's clear as day.. either he made that about of his own powerset or incorporated that tech with his other stuff.

Lastly, it supports mine for this reason and please pay attention. YOU THOUGH.. YOU THOUGHT.. that each fight they come back with knowledge of their previous fight and any adaptations they might have picked up from dying or just learning from the previous encounter. THAT IS TOTALLY WRONG. My view point is that they don't do that at all and come back with no knowledge or no adaptation... GET IT NOW.. You were wrong and you should admit when you are wrong.. at least sometimes.. MY GOD.

Ooooooooooooooooooooh....I was misinterpreting this point.Ok yeah your right here.But HP DD can still adapt in the middle of the battle and was tearing through people that were beating high heralds.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
[B]IN B&T thanos did not use a sheild against thor. It didn't show him when he used it.

BBZ OWNED,now go troll in another thread.

Originally posted by Nihilist

BBZ OWNED,now go troll in another thread.

Lol... he is the master of getting owned and yes, he is the true definition of a troll.

Guys, no more personal stuff.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Guys, no more personal stuff.

Originally posted by Nihilist

BBZ OWNED,now go troll in another thread.

And quit bashing like you do in every single thread you ever post.

Originally posted by carver9
Lol... he is the master of getting owned and yes, he is the true definition of a troll.

Originally posted by Nihilist
BBZ is clearly trolling 2 crystal clear on panel showings, and he has the nerve to say "no didnt happen" and "yes used a gun" when it shows he did use a shield and didnt use a gun.

And he it can't be said either way about using the gun on odin.It didn't show him.But it did show him using it on thor.I still have 1 point and you still have none.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
I said I didn't remember a sheild.I never said he didn't use one.

And he it can't be said either way about using the gun on odin.It didn't show him.But it did show him using it on thor.I still have 1 point and you still have none.

And stop reporting like you do in every single thread, if you cant debate using actual knowledge or proof, dont enter the thread and start debating.

Tell you what show me a scan of Thanos holding a gun during the Odin fight or i'll report you for trolling.

Originally posted by Nihilist
BBZ is clearly trolling 2 crystal clear on panel showings, and he has the nerve to say "no didnt happen" and "yes used a gun" when it shows he did use a shield and didnt use a gun.

that doesn't matter. if you think someone is trolling, you report them. calling them trolls in a thread isn't allowed, and can actually result in the accuser getting warned rather than the accused.

Originally posted by -Pr-
that doesn't matter. if you think someone is trolling, you report them. calling them trolls in a thread isn't allowed, and can actually result in the accuser getting warned rather than the accused.

Originally posted by Nihilist
So i was reported for posting on panel proof that shows he is trolling?

if you were reported, then you were reported. we look over reports and form our own decisions. if you didn't do anything wrong then you have nothing to worry about.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
I said I didn't remember a sheild.I never said he didn't use one.

And he it can't be said either way about using the gun on odin.It didn't show him.But it did show him using it on thor.I still have 1 point and you still have none.

Stop lying... someone brought up thanos using a shield and you said"no he didnt". That's ok though because the next time you troll I am reporting you.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Ok carver explain how that helps his case? IN B&T thanos did not use a sheild against thor. It didn't show him when he used it.On panel it didn't show him.But it did show him on panel using it with the gun.

You can't say either way.Either way its just speculation as it didn't show him.But it did show him with the gun.Me:1 you:0

Here is your post where you stated that he didn't use the shield.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Thats the main thing.Its not even part of his basic equipment.Hes used it in two comics in one arc and never again.So its not even basic equipment for him.

You're completely missing the point.

The point isn't whether or not it'd be basic equipment. The point is that it was shown on panel that what was originally shown on panel to be achieved with tech was later shown to be replicated without it, and that there is a pretty good reason why tech is used at times even when one has the innate ability to accomplish something. The basic equipment thing only comes into play IF you can show that it was a tech augmentation against Odin. Which you can't.

In short, Thanos' force block against Odin was shown to be without tech. If you are drawing a conclusion that one occurence (Odin) has to be tech due to the other, the burden of proof is on you.