Scientific theory and scientific method: Are they applicable to God?

JIA, give up on ID. It's not Christian.

Originally posted by AngryManatee
Now are they scientists? lolz no.

No, but all of them have manipulated people or situations to suit their needs.

😄

Signing off now.

yawn

sleepy

The analyzation/experimental/observation part is assumed to be true at #2 for the sake of your argument . . . . but your conclusion still fails.

Your newly reworded hypothesis has no relation to the conclusion you want to draw.

Recognizing design from complexity is different from assigning design to a designer to prove his existence which what is your earlier goal. Complexity is not necessarily design and design does not necessarily require a designer.

Originally posted by Templares
The analyzation/experimental/observation part is assumed to be true at #2 for the sake of your argument . . . . but your conclusion still fails.

Your newly reworded hypothesis has no relation to the conclusion you want to draw.

Recognizing design from complexity is different from assigning design to a designer to prove his existence which what is your earlier goal. Complexity is not necessarily design and design does not necessarily require a designer.

Experiment or Observation: Analyze the universe, planets, stars, earth, fundamental forces, cells, life, etc.

But what have I assumed? I simply state my intention in the experiment or observation phase of the method.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
[B]Experiment or Observation: Analyze the universe, planets, stars, earth, fundamental forces, cells, life, etc. [/B]

Sitting back and watching isn't experimentation.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
They had video cameras 3000 years ago? 😕

Surely even you know that the Buddha was reincarnated!

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I cannot determine that the universe had a starting point, that fundamental forces can be harnessed and studied using the scientific method, that the earth is the only habitable planet in our solar system, that one cell has more information than a 1,000 volume encyclopedia (by the way information requires an intelligent mind), and that the human brain, heart, mind, and body are so complicated that there is no way that it could have just came into being on its own from inorganic matter?

Well, you are wrong.

God is absolute and I believe that He created matter and life with the capability for study so that it could point us straight to Him (God and His omniscience does it again).

Originally posted by Alliance
Congratulations on changing the point, totally failing to address all my points, then telling me I'm wrong.

Your a biologist aren't you?

I'm a physician.

Originally posted by The Grey Fox
I'm a physician.

Cue Ush's Law.

(Good I love that)

Liar.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Your a biologist aren't you?

Bardock would say no.

Do I conduct biological research every weekday? Yes (for 2 years now). Though I haven't personally been published yet, I obviously work with people who have.

Take it how you will.

Ah, I thought you were.

it happens. I don't like to talk about it, but sometimes some people need a credibility check.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Sitting back and watching isn't experimentation.

I never said a thing about sitting or watching (that was all you). I said analyze (that word is very proactive).

Originally posted by Alliance
Congratulations on changing the point, totally failing to address all my points, then telling me I'm wrong.

I addressed your post (what have I changed?).

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I never said a thing about sitting or watching (that was all you). I said [B]analyze (that word is very proactive).
[/B]

Originally posted by PITT_HAPPENS
You can not test creationism.

But you can conduct extensive analysis of matter and life, and record their complexity and complicaton respectively. Thus, you can prove that matter and life did not arise by accident, or random chance, but is the product of an extremely wise, knowledgable, intelligent, and exceedingly powerful Designer.

Originally posted by PITT_HAPPENS
You can not test creationism.

Well, I personally don't take the Story of Genesis as a literal interpretation of events. I see it as poetical.